Page 164 - IJB-8-1
P. 164

Design Criteria for Patient-Specific Mandibular Implant
           implant  structure  optimization [8,9] .  These  studies  also
           advocated the importance of “custom-made” personalized
           implants that can be fabricated using the AM technique.
           In addition to reducing the reconstruction implant weight,
           performing  implant  structure  optimization  analysis
           also  reduces  the  stress  shielding  that  might  cause  bone
           resorption  and  eventual  failure .  The  current  analysis
                                     [23]
           results showed that the reconstructed implant weights in
           different segments can be reduced by at least 50% through
           the lightweight optimization structural design. This result   Figure  5.  Finite  element  displacement  comparison  between  B
           was consistent with the study by Cheng et al. who produced   segmental  mandible  defect  restored  with  reconstructed  implants
           a  titanium  canine  mandibular  implant  that  possessed  a   and bone plate.
           personalized external shape for appearance recovery and
           structural optimization and a weight reduction of 37.2% .   trials. The number of mandible CT images in the database
                                                         [8]
           However, the maximum stress values of the reconstructed   can be gradually expanded to include patients outside of
           implant  and  the  remaining  bone  were  not  obviously   Taiwan after the clinical application of our reconstructed
           reduced in this study. The stress values were, however, far   implant  is  successful.  Following  up  with  the  developed
           lower due to the materials’ ultimate strength. This is still   technique in this study, remote design, and manufacture
           within the acceptable range. The stress concentrations of   of the reconstructed implant can be performed through the
           the reconstructed implants were also noted the same as on   medical network for clinical treatment.
           the connected fixation wing and fixation screws with other
           studies. This inferred that implant failure can occur due to   5. Conclusions
           high stress concentration on the screws in the fixation unit   This  study  developed  a  design  criterion  for  patient-
           and implied that the fixation wing can be improved for   specific  reconstructed  implants  with  lightweight
           further design .                                    structural   optimization   for   various   mandibular
                      [8]
               The biomechanical fatigue test results indicated that   continuity defects. The sizes and positions of the internal
           all mandibular continuity defects using AM reconstructed   support beams for the reconstructed implant are defined
           implants based on our design criteria can pass the 250,000   parametrically  through  corresponding  segmental  bone
           cyclic  load  test,  that  is,  survival  in  actual  occlusal   length, width, and height. Biomechanical fatigue testing
           situations  for  about  6  months  after  clinical  surgery.   validated  that  all  mandibular  continuity  defects  using
           However,  failure  tests  with  mandibular  condyle  head   the AM reconstructed implant can pass cyclic dynamic
           fracture,  bone  plate  fracture,  or  bone  screw  loosening   loads.  Condyle  head,  bone  plate  fractures,  and  bone
           were  found  corresponding  with  mandibular  continuity   screw  loosening  can  be  found  in  restored  mandibular
           defects  using  traditional  bone  plate.  This  phenomenon   defects using bone plates.
           was  because  the  traditional  bone  plate  cannot  provide
           enough  stiffness  to  maintain  stability  for  the  restored   Acknowledgments
           mandible, causing it to become strongly distorted when
           receiving repeated occlusal force. Taking the B segment as   Authors would like to appreciate Anji Technology Co.,
           an example for FE analysis, the simulated result found that   Ltd., for assistant in metal 3DP manufacture.
           the twist displacement of the mandibular defect used with   Funding
           traditional bone plate was much larger than that used in
           the AM reconstructed implant (Figure 5). In addition, an   This  study  is  supported  in  part  by  MOST  project
           axial force state induced the bending moment effect on the   108-2622-E-010-001-CC2  and  108-2622-B-010-005,
           reconstructed implant only when applied on the mandible   Taiwan.
           of  the  current  biomechanical  test.  Standard  4-point
           bending fatigue tests based on ASTM F382 testing method   Conflict of interest
           need to be performed in the future to compare the implant
           mechanical strength between different AM reconstructed   The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
           implants  and  traditional  bone  plate  to  comply  with  the   Authors contributions
           FDA’s SE functional test comparison for marketing .
                                                     [23]
               The  mandibular  bone  CT  image  database  was   All  authors  have  made  substantial  contributions  to
           constructed using images of only 105 patients in this study.   conception  and  design  of  the  study.  Y.T.  Wang,  C.M.
           The current most important task is to apply our reconstructed   Chang,  and  W.H.  Tsai  have  been  involved  in  data
           implant for restored severe mandibular defect in clinical   collection  and  data  analysis.  C.L.  Lin, Y.T. Wang,  and

           150                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169