Page 165 - IJB-8-1

Lin, et al.
C.H. Wu were involved in data interpretation, drafting https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.10.004
the manuscript and revising it critically, and given final 10. Moiduddin K, Hammad Mian S, Alkhalefah H, et al., 2019,
approval of the version to be published. All authors read Digital Design, Analysis and 3D Printing of Prosthesis
the published manuscript version and agreed. Scaffolds for Mandibular Reconstruction. Metals, 9:569.

References https://doi.org/10.3390/met9050569
11. Li CH, Wu CH, Lin CL, 2020, Design of a Patient-Specific
1. Patel A, Harrison P, Cheng A, et al., 2019, Fibular Mandible Reconstruction Implant with Dental Prosthesis
Reconstruction of the Maxilla and Mandible with Immediate for Metal 3D Printing Using Integrated Weighted Topology
Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation: Jaw in a Day. Optimization and Finite Element Analysis. J Mech Behav
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am, 31:369–86. Biomed Mater, 105:103700.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coms.2019.03.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103700
2. Toure G, Gouet E, 2019, Use of a 3-Dimensional Custom- 12. Kumar BP, Venkatesh V, Kumar KA, et al., 2016,
Made Porous Titanium Prosthesis for Mandibular Body Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview. J Maxillofac Oral
Reconstruction with Prosthetic Dental Rehabilitation and Surg, 15:425–41.
Lipofilling. J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 77:1305–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-015-0766-5
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.12.026 13. Hara D, 2016, Bone Bonding Strength of Diamond-
3. Qin M, Liu Y, Wang L, et al., 2015, Design and Optimization Structured Porous Titanium-Alloy Implants Manufactured
of the Fixing Plate for Customized Mandible Implants. Using the Electron Beam Melting Technique. Mater Sci Eng
J Craniomaxillofac, 43:1296–302. C, 59:1047–52.
4. Stoor P, Suomalainen A, Mesimaki K, et al., 2017, Rapid https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.11.025
Prototyped Patient Specific Guiding Implants in Critical 14. Taniguchi N, 2016, Effect of Pore Size on Bone Ingrowth
Mandibular Reconstruction. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 45:63– into Porous Titanium Implants Fabricated by Additive
70. Manufacturing: An In Vivo Experiment. Mater Sci Eng C,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.10.021 59:690–701.
5. Lee S, Kim HG, Ham MJ, et al., 2018, Custom Implant for https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069
Reconstruction of Mandibular Continuity Defect. J Oral 15. Premarket Notification, 2018, No. K173039, 510(K)
Maxillofac Surg, 76:1370–6. Premarket Notification, FDA, U.S., p1–11.
6. Yusa K, Yamanouchi H, Yoshida Y, et al., 2017, Evaluation of 16. Beer FP, Johnston ER Jr., DeWolf JT, et al., 2017, Mechanics
Quality of Life and Masticatory Function in Patients Treated of Materials. 7 ed., Ch. 4. New York, United States:
th
with Mandibular Reconstruction Followed by Occlusal McGraw-Hill.
Rehabilitation with Dental Implants: A Preliminary Report. 17. Lin CL, Wang JC, Chang WJ, 2008, Biomechanical
J Oral Maxillofac Surg Med Pathol, 29:499–503. Interactions in Tooth-Implant‐Supported Fixed Partial
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoms.2017.06.004 Dentures with Variations in the Number of Splinted Teeth
7. Liu YF, Fan YY, Jiang XF, et al., 2017, A Customized and Connector Type: A Finite Element Analysis. Clin Oral
Fixation Plate with Novel Structure Designed by Topological Implants Res, 19:107–17.
Optimization for Mandibular Angle Fracture Based on Finite https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2007.01363.x
Element Analysis. Biomed Eng Online, 16:131–47. 18. Narra N, Valášek J, Hannula M, et al., 2014, Finite Element
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-017-0422-z Analysis of Customized Reconstruction Plates for Mandibular
8. Cheng K, Liu Y, Yao C, et al., 2019, A Personalized Continuity Defect Therapy. J Biomech, 47:264–8.
Mandibular Implant with Supporting and Porous Structures https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.11.016
Designed with Topology Optimization-a Case Study of 19. Warreth A, 2015, Fundamentals of Occlusion and Restorative
Canine. Rapid Prototyp J, 25:417–26. Dentistry. Part I: Basic Principles. J Ir Dent Assoc, 61:201–8.
https://doi.org/10.1108/rpj-11-2017-0231 20. Al Qassar SS, Mavragani M, Psarras V, et al., 2916, The
9. Pinheiro M, Alves JL, 2015, The Feasibility of a Custom- Anterior Component of Occlusal Force Revisited: Direct
Made Endoprosthesis in Mandibular Reconstruction: Implant Measurement and Theoretical Considerations. Eur J Orthod,
Design and Finite Element Analysis. J Craniomaxillofac 38:190–6.
Surg, 43:2116–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjv028

International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1 151