Page 224 - IJB-8-1

Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10735-020-09941-1 57. Díaz-Arca A, Ros-Tárraga P, Tomé MJ, et al., 2021, Micro-/
50. Lyu J, Hashimoto Y, Honda Y, et al., 2021, Comparison Nano-Structured Ceramic Scaffolds That Mimic Natural
of Osteogenic Potentials of Dental Pulp and Bone Marrow Cancellous Bone. Materials, 14:1439.
Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using the New Cell Transplantation https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14061439
Platform, CellSaic, in a Rat Congenital Cleft-Jaw Model. Int 58. Liao B, Xia RF, Li W, et al., 2021, 3D-Printed Ti6Al4V
J Mol Sci, 22:9478. Scaffolds with Graded Triply Periodic Minimal Surface
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179478 Structure for Bone Tissue Engineering. J Mater Eng Perform,
51. Li W, Liu Y, Wang B, et al., 2016, Protective Effect of 30:4993–5004.
Berberine Against Oxidative Stress-Induced Apoptosis in Rat https://doi.org/10.1007/s11665-021-05580-z
Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells. Exp Ther 59. Perez RA, Mestres G, 2016, Role of Pore Size and Morphology
Med, 12:4041–8. in Musculo-Skeletal Tissue Regeneration. Mater Sci Eng C,
https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2016.3866 61:922–39.
52. Sousa B, Pereira J, Paredes J, 2019, The Crosstalk Between https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2015.12.087
Cell Adhesion and Cancer Metabolism. Int J Mol Sci, 60. Lee SJ, Yang S, 2017, Substrate Curvature Restricts Spreading
20:1933. and Induces Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20081933 Cells. Biotechnol J, 12:1700360.
53. Hamidi H, Ivaska J, 2021, Food for Thought: How Cell https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201700360
Adhesion Coordinates Nutrient Sensing. J Cell Biol, 61. Ji L, LaPointe VL, Evans ND, et al., 2012, Changes in
220:e202103128. Embryonic Stem Cell Colony Morphology and Early
https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202103128 Differentiation Markers Driven by Colloidal Crystal
54. Ng IC, Pawijit P, Tan J, et al., 2019, Anatomy and Physiology Topographical Cues. Eur Cell Mater, 23:135–46.
for Biomaterials Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.22203/eCM.v023a10
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.99876-3 62. Chen W, Shao Y, Li X, et al., 2014, Nanotopographical
55. Fritz V, Fajas L, 2010, Metabolism and Proliferation Share Surfaces for Stem Cell Fate Control: Engineering
Common Regulatory Pathways in Cancer Cells. Oncogene, Mechanobiology from the Bottom. Nano Today, 9:759–84.
29:4369–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2014.12.002
https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2010.182 63. Xia J, Yuan Y, Wu H, et al., 2020, Decoupling the Effects
56. Chen QZ, Thouas GA, 2011, Fabrication and Characterization of Nanopore Size and Surface Roughness on the Attachment,
of Sol-Gel Derived 45S5 Bioglass®-Ceramic Scaffolds. Acta Spreading and Differentiation of Bone Marrow-Derived Stem
Biomater, 7:3616–26. Cells. Biomaterials, 248:120014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2011.06.005 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120014

Publisher’s note
Whioce Publishing remains neutral with regard to
jurisdictional claims in published maps and
institutional affiliations.

210 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1