Page 223 - IJB-8-1

Liang, et al.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.8b00052 39. Huri PY, Ozilgen BA, Hutton DL, et al., 2014, Scaffold Pore
28. Cross MM, 1965, Rheology of non-Newtonian Fluids: Size Modulates In Vitro Osteogenesis of Human Adipose-
A New Flow Equation for Pseudoplastic Systems. J Coll Sci, Derived Stem/Stromal Cells. Biomed Mater, 9:045003.
20:417–37. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-6041/9/4/045003
https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-8522(65)90022-X 40. Velioglu ZB, Pulat D, Demirbakan B, et al., 2019, 3D-Printed
29. Barnes HA, Hutton JF, Walters K, 1989, An Introduction to Poly (Lactic Acid) Scaffolds for Trabecular Bone Repair and
Rheology. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. Regeneration: Scaffold and Native Bone Characterization.
30. Griffith ML, Halloran JW, 1996, Freeform Fabrication of Connect Tissue Res, 60:274–82.
Ceramics Via Stereolithography. J Am Ceram Soc, 79:2601–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/03008207.2018.1499732
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09022.x 41. Edwards K, 2005, Selecting Materials for Optimum Use in
31. Conti L, Bienenstein D, Borlaf M, et al., 2020, Effects of the Engineering Components. Mater Des, 26:469–73.
Layer Height and Exposure Energy on the Lateral Resolution https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2004.07.004
of Zirconia Parts Printed by Lithography-Based Additive 42. van Lenthe GH, de Waal Malefijt MC, Huiskes R, 1997,
Manufacturing. Materials, 13:1317. Stress Shielding after Total Knee Replacement May Cause
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13061317 Bone Resorption in the Distal Femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br,
32. Wang K, Qiu M, Jiao C, et al., 2020, Study on Defect- 79:117–22.
Free Debinding Green Body of Ceramic Formed by DLP https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.79B1.0790117
Technology. Ceram Int, 46:2438–46. 43. Lindahl O, 1976, Mechanical Properties of Dried Defatted
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.09.237 Spongy Bone. Acta Orthop Scand, 47:11–9.
33. Feng C, Zhang K, He R, et al., 2020, Additive Manufacturing https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677608998966
of Hydroxyapatite Bioceramic Scaffolds: Dispersion, Digital 44. Røhl L, Larsen E, Linde F, et al., 1991, Tensile and
Light Processing, Sintering, Mechanical Properties, and Compressive Properties of Cancellous Bone. J Biomech,
Biocompatibility. J Adv Ceram, 9:360–73. 24:1143–9.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40145-020-0375-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(91)90006-9
34. Zeng Y, Yan Y, Yan H, et al., 2018, 3D Printing of 45. Giesen E, Ding M, Dalstra M, et al., 2001, Mechanical
Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds with Good Mechanical and Properties of Cancellous Bone in the Human Mandibular
Biocompatible Properties by Digital Light Processing. Condyle are Anisotropic. J Biomech, 34:799–803.
J Mater Sci, 53:6291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00030-6
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-018-1992-2 46. Xie J, Zorman J, Indrawati L, et al., 2013, Development
35. Shan J, Yang Z, Chen G, et al., 2020, Design and Synthesis and Optimization of a Novel Assay to Measure Neutralizing
of Free-Radical/Cationic Photosensitive Resin Applied for Antibodies Against Clostridium Difficile Toxins. Clin Vaccine
3D Printer with Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) Irradiation. Immunol, 20:517–25.
Polymers, 12:1346. https://doi/10.1128/CVI.00549-12
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym12061346 47. Lan Y, Jin Q, Xie H, et al., 2020, Exosomes Enhance Adhesion
36. Guo B, Ji X, Wang W, et al., 2021, Highly Flexible, Thermally and Osteogenic Differentiation of Initial Bone Marrow Stem
Stable, and Static Dissipative Nanocomposite with Reduced Cells on Titanium Surfaces. Front Cell Dev Biol, 8:583234.
Functionalized Graphene Oxide Processed Through 3D https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2020.583234
Printing. Compos B Eng, 208:108598. 48. Zheng HZ, Fu XK, Shang JL, et al., 2018, Ginsenoside Rg1
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108598 Protects Rat Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells Against
37. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D, 2005, Porosity of 3D Biomaterial Ischemia Induced Apoptosis Through miR-494-3p and
Scaffolds and Osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26:5474–91. ROCK-1. Eur J Pharmacol, 822:154–67.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2018.01.001
38. Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, et al., 2016, 49. Sun Z, Yan K, Liu S, et al., 2021, Semaphorin 3A Promotes
Scaffolds and Cells for Tissue Regeneration: Different the Osteogenic Differentiation of Rat Bone Marrow-Derived
Scaffold Pore Sizes-Different Cell Effects. Cytotechnology, Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Inflammatory Environments by
68:355–69. Suppressing the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling Pathway. J Mol
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4 Histol, 52:1245–125.

International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1 209