Page 75 - IJB-8-1
P. 75

Seiti, et al.
           (2) Cell adhesion and viability on PEDOT: PSS samples  be  also  a  major  (co-)cause  of  these  results. At  48  h,  a

           As shown in Figure 6I and J, the immunofluorescence   detectable presence of cellular agglomerates was visible
           assays of NSCs  cultured on Matrigel-coated  AJ P   near the well edges (Figure 7B). Figure 7C shows the
                                                         ®
           PEDOT:  PSS printed  samples  show limited  cellular   findings of the cell viability rATP assay (time points 24 h,
           adhesion  and no detectable  proliferation  subsequently.   48  h,  and  96  h)  of  NSCs  cultured  on  Matrigel-coated
                                                                 ®
           This is in contrast with the data on NSCs  seeded on   AJ P printed PEDOT: PSS samples. At time point 24 h,
           Matrigel-coated  plastic  control  samples,  which  exhibit   NSCs showed a healthier state on the plastic control than
           a healthy state condition of cellular  adhesion and   on the sample. At 48 h, the metabolic activity of the NSCs
           proliferation  along  with neural networks formation.   on the substrates further reduced. Eventually, at 96 h, the
           This can be caused by a detected hydrophobic behavior   cytotoxicity of the PEDOT: PSS samples was ×10 higher
           of the samples when in contact with the NSCs/medium   than the plastic controls.  This could be related  to the
           culture dispersion.  When poured on the samples, the   residual presence of the co-solvent DEG in the printed
           NSC  dispersion  remained  confined  into  a  drop-like   pattern, which does not fully evaporate after sintering. To
           shape, limiting cell spreading on the surface (Figure 7A).   validate this hypothesis, an indirect cell viability assay
           A potential cytotoxicity of the used PEDOT: PSS ink can   was performed on printed PEDOT: PSS samples sintered


           A                         C                                   D





           B













           E                                                      F






















           Figure 7. Cell viability assay of NSCs on plastic control and PEDOT: PSS samples. (A) Representative image of the ink’s hydrophobicity.
           (B) Optical image with focus on the presence of NSCs agglomerates near the well edges detected after 48 h. (C) NSCs rATP direct viability
           assay at 3 time points (24 h, 48 h and 96 h) on printed PEDOT: PSS samples, revealing an increasing cytotoxic behavior of the PEDOT: PSS
           ink. (D) NSCs rATP undirect viability assay at 3 time points (24 h, 48 h and 120 h) on printed PEDOT: PSS samples, confirming a high
           cytotoxic behavior of the PEDOT: PSS ink already after 24 h. (E) NSCs rATP undirect viability assay at 2 time points (24 h and 48 h) on
           spin-coated PEDOT: PSS samples, cured at six different conditions (150°C for 8, 60, and 120 min, and 200°C for 8, 60, and 120 min),
           showing good biocompatibility. (F) NSCs rATP undirect viability assay at 3 time points (24 h, 72 h, and 120 h) on spin-coated PEDOT: PSS
           samples, cured at 150°C for 120 min, confirming a dose-dependent behavior of the PEDOT: PSS ink.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 1        61
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80