Page 116 - IJB-8-2
P. 116

3D-Printing-Assisted EADs for Preventing VUR through DJ Stents
               Deposition Modeling 3D Printing for (Bio)analytical Device   Aptamer-targeted  Ecoflex®  Nanoparticles  for  Docetaxel
               Fabrication:  Procedures,  Materials,  and Applications.  Anal   Delivery in Ovarian Cancer. Int J Nanomed, 13:493–504.
               Chem, 89:7053–61.                                   https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S152474
               https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b00828    46.  Chen CC, Chueh JY, Tseng H, et al., 2003, Preparation and
           37.  Skowyra  J,  Pietrzak  K, Alhnan  MA,  2015,  Fabrication  of   Characterization  of  Biodegradable  PLA  Polymeric  Blends.
               Extended-release  Patient-Tailored  Prednisolone Tablets Via   Biomaterials, 24:1167–73.
               Fused  Deposition  Modelling  (FDM)  3D  Printing.  Eur J      https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00466-0
               Pharm Sci, 68:11–7.                             47.  Chuensangjun  C,  Pechyen  C,  Sirisansaneeyakul  S,  2013,
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejps.2014.11.009          Degradation Behaviors of Different Blends of Polylactic Acid
           38.  He Y, Wu Y, Fu JZ, et al., 2016, Developments of 3D Printing   Buried in Soil. Energy Proc, 34:73–82.
               Microfluidics  and Applications  in  Chemistry  and  Biology:      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.735
               A Review. Electroanalysis, 28:1658–78.          48.  Erokhin  KS,  Gordeev  EG, Ananikov  VP,  2019,  Revealing
               https://doi.org/10.1002/elan.201600043              Interactions of Layered Polymeric Materials at Solid-liquid
           39.  Lalehpour A, Janeteas C, Barari A, et al., 2018, Surface Roughness   Interface for Building Solvent Compatibility Charts for 3D
               of FDM Parts After Post-processing with Acetone Vapor Bath   Printing Applications. Sci Rep, 9:20177.
               Smoothing Process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 95:1505–20.     https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56350-w
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1165-5       49.  Yashima S, Takase N, Kurokawa T, et al., 2014, Friction of
           40.  Kang B, Sung J, So H, 2021, Realization of Superhydrophobic   Hydrogels with Controlled Surface Roughness on Solid Flat
               Surfaces Based on Three-Dimensional Printing Technology.   Substrates. Soft Matter, 10:3192–9.
               Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol, 8:47–55.      https://doi.org/10.1039/c3sm52883a
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00163-9      50.  Kaler KS, Lama DJ, Safiullah S, et al., 2019, Ureteral Access
           41.  Park  S,  Ko  B,  Lee  H,  et al.,  2021,  Rapid  Manufacturing   Sheath Deployment: How Much Force is Too Much? Initial
               of  Micro-drilling  Devices  using  FFF-Type  3D  Printing   Studies with a Novel Ureteral Access Sheath Force Sensor in
               Technology. Sci Rep, 11.1-9.                        the Porcine Ureter. J Endourol, 33:712–8.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91149-8          https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0211
           42.  He Y, Qiu J, Fu J, et al., 2015, Printing 3D Microfluidic Chips   51.  Lancastre JJ, Fernandes, N, Margaça FM, et al., 2012, Study of
               with a 3D Sugar Printer, Microfluid Nanofluidics, 19:447–56.  PDMS Conformation in PDMS-based Hybrid Materials Prepared
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-015-1571-7           by Gamma Irradiation. Radiat Phys Chem, 81:1336–40.
           43.  Sung  J,  So  H,  2021,  3D  Printing-assisted  Fabrication  of      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2012.02.016
               Microgrid  Patterns  for  Flexible  Antiadhesive  Polymer   52.  Lee J, Kim J, Kim H, et al., 2013, Effect of Thermal Treatment
               Surfaces. Surf Interfaces. 23:100935.               on  the  Chemical  Resistance  of  Polydimethylsiloxane  for
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2021.100935        Microfluidic Devices. J Micromech Microeng, 23:035007.
           44.  Amjadi M, Yoon YJ, Park I, 2015, Ultra-stretchable and Skin-     https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/23/3/035007
               mountable  Strain  Sensors  using  Carbon  Nanotubes-ecoflex   53.  Zhao  Y,  Zhu  B,  Wang  Y,  et al.,  2019,  Effect  of  Different
               Nanocomposites. Nanotechnology, 26:375501.          Sterilization  Methods  on  the  Properties  of  Commercial
               https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/26/37/375501      Biodegradable Polyesters for Single-use, Disposable Medical
           45.  Ghassami E, Varshosaz J, Jahanian-Najafabadi A, et al., 2018,   Devices. Mater Sci Eng C, 105:110041.
               Pharmacokinetics and in vitro/In Vivo Antitumor Efficacy of      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.110041









                                                               Publisher’s note
                                                               Whioce  Publishing  remains  neutral  with  regard  to
                                                               jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
                                                               affiliations.

           108                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121