Page 77 - IJB-8-2
P. 77

Zhang, et al.
               9(15):2000156.                                      https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3089.2004.00170.x
               https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156          21.  Copaescu  C,  Dragomirescu  C,  2009,  The  Pig  Model  for
           12.  Pietrabissa  A,  Marconi  S,  Negrello  E, et  al.,  2020, An   the  Laparoscopic  Antireflux  Surgery  Training.  Chirurgia
               Overview  on  3D  Printing  for  Abdominal  Surgery.  Surg   (Bucur), 104:309–15.
               Endosc Other Intervent Tech, 34(1): 1-13.       22.  He  J,  Fang  Y,  Chen  X,  2015,  Surgical  Models  of
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07155-5          Gastroesophageal Reflux with Mice. J Vis Exp, 102:e53012.
           13.  Kwon J, Choi J, Lee S, et al., 2020, Modelling and Manufacturing      https://doi.org/10.3791/53012
               of  3D-printed,  Patient-specific,  and  anthropomorphic  gastric   23.  Filho EV, Goldenberg A, Costa HO, 2005, Experimental Model
               phantoms: A pilot study. Sci Rep, 10:18976.         of Gastroesophageal Reflux in Rats. Acta Cir Bras, 20:437–44.
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-74110-z          https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-86502005000600008
           14.  Ratinam  R,  Quayle  M,  Crock  J, et al., 2019, Challenges   24.  Wei F, Xu M, Lai X, et al., 2019, Three-dimensional Printed
               in Creating Dissectible Anatomical 3D  Prints for Surgical   dry Lab  Training  Models to  Simulate  Robotic-assisted
               Teaching. J Anat, 234:419–37.                       Pancreaticojejunostomy. ANZ J Surg, 89:1631–5.
               https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.12934                   https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.15544
           15.  Yadlapati R, Hungness ES, Pandolfino JE, 2018, Complications   25.  Horgan S, Pohl D, Bogetti D, et al., 1999, Failed Antireflux
               of Antireflux Surgery. Am J Gastroenterol, 113:1137–47.  Surgery what have we Learned  from Reoperations?  Arch
               https://doi.org/10.1038/s41395-018-0115-7           Surg, 134:809–15.
           16.  Wu  JM,  Chen  D,  2020, The Evolution and  Expectation of      https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.134.8.809
               Surgical  Options  for  Gastroesophageal  Reflux  Disease.   26.  Lundell  L,  2004,  Complications  after  Anti-reflux  Surgery.
               Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi, 58:677–82.                  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 18:935–45.
               https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200229-00162     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2004.08.004
           17.  Xiao YL, Zhou LY, Hou XH, et al., 2021, Chinese Expert   27.  Maret-Ouda  J,  Wahlin  K,  El-Serag  HB, et  al., 2017,
               Consensus  on  Gastroesophageal  Reflux  Disease  in  2020.   Association  Between  Laparoscopic Antireflux  Surgery  and
               J Dig Dis, 22:376–89.                               Recurrence of Gastroesophageal Reflux. JAMA, 318:939–46.
               https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-2980.13028             https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.10981
           18.  La Torre M, Caruso C, 2013, The Animal Model in Advanced   28.  Lin HH, Lonic D, Lo LJ, 2018, 3D Printing in Orthognathic
               Laparoscopy  Resident  Training.  Surg Laparosc Endosc   Surgery a literature review. J Formos Med Assoc, 117:547–58.
               Percutan Tech, 23:271–5.                            https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2018.01.008
               https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828b895b    29.  Weidert  S,  Andress  S,  Suero  E, et al., 2019, 3D Printing in
           19.  Daly SC, Wilson NA, Rinewalt DE, et al., 2014, A Subjective   Orthopedic  and  Trauma  Surgery  Education  and  Training:
               Assessment of Medical  Student  Perceptions  on  Animal   Possibilities and Fields of Application. Unfallchirurg, 122:444–51.
               Models in Medical Education. J Surg Educ, 71:61–4.     https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-019-0650-8
               https://doi.org/v10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.06.017    30.  Hatala R, Cook DA, Brydges R, et al., 2015, Constructing a
           20.  Tanaka H, Yoshino H, Kobayashi E, et al., 2004, Molecular   Validity Argument for the Objective Structured Assessment of
               Investigation  of  Hepatitis  E  Virus  Infection  in  Domestic   Technical Skills (OSATS): A Systematic Review of Validity
               and  Miniature  Pigs  Used  for  Medical  Experiments.   Evidence. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract, 20:1149–75.
               Xenotransplantation, 11:503–10.                     https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-015-9593-1










                                                               Publisher’s note
                                                               Whioce  Publishing  remains  neutral  with  regard  to
                                                               jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional
                                                               affiliations.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2        69
   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82