Page 79 - IJB-8-2
P. 79

Mieloch, et al.
           the literature [11-13] . For the purpose of this study, two types   2.3. Material preparation
           of  CNT  were  selected:  “bamboo-like”  CNT  (BNCT)
           and multiwalled CNT (MWCNT). “Bamboo-like” CNT      The PCL and CNT powders were mixed in 15 ml Falcon
           (BCNT) resemble the cup-in-cup structure characteristic   tubes by shaking until a visually homogeneous powder
                                                               was  obtained.  Subsequently,  the  powder  was  placed
           of the bamboo stem, with a high presence  of surface   on a glass Petri dish and heated on a magnetic stirrer
           defects. This type of CNT is comparatively inexpensive
           as its imperfect morphology does not require stringent   until  melting  occurred.  The  melt  was  cooled  down
           synthesis conditions. MWCNT are composed of multiple   and folded several times to improve the homogeneity
           single-walled CNT with diminishing diameters, arranged   of  the  material.  Finally,  the  melt  was  cut  into  pellet-
           concentrically. Due to the diminished quantity of structural   like pieces, which were suitable for the thermoplastic
           defects in comparison to BCNT, MWNCT can be used    printhead.
           for tissue engineering applications requiring electrical   2.4. 3D printing
           conductivity .  In  recent  years,  a  lot  of  research  has
                     [14]
           been devoted to electrospun PCL/CNT nanocomposites   3D printing was performed with the Cellink BioX
           for tissue engineering purposes, indicating a growing   printer.  In  the  process,  the  thermoplastic  printhead
           interest in biopolymers with CNT additives [15-19] .  In   was utilized. The 3D model of the grid was prepared
           regard to PCL/CNT composites, a staggering amount   by  manual  writing  of  a.gcode  file.  The  printing  was
           of variables, such as CNT aspect ratios, purity, defects,   performed with the following parameters: printhead
           functionalizations, entanglement within a polymer   nozzle  diameter,  0.4  mm;  printhead  temperature,
           matrix, and interfacial interactions reduce any predictive   180°C; printing speed, 4 mm/s; and extrusion pressure,
           attempts of resulting properties to an educated guess. In   510 kPa.
           addition, the potential cytotoxicity of a nanocomposite
           material depends  on  the  biodegradation  rate  and   2.5. Nanoindentation
           subsequent gradual release of the nanofiller into the tissue   The nanoindentation  study was performed on a G200
           environment. Therefore,  despite  a  plethora  of  relevant   (Agilent) nanoindenter equipped with a DCM head. Each
           research,  a  specific  application-driven  design  of  CNT-  sample was subjected to 12 indentations of 2000 nm in-
           reinforced  polymers still requires  extensive laboratory   depth, with a Berkovich-type probe, at room temperature.
           work.  This  work  aimed  to  evaluate  mechanical  and   Analyses were performed at 500 – 1800 nm depth. Due
           biological properties of PCL reinforced with BCNT and   to the uneven topography of the surface, extreme results
           MWCNT from a 3D bioprinting and tissue engineering   were excluded from further analysis.
           point of view.
                                                               2.6. Parallel plate rheometry
           2. Materials and methods
                                                               The rheology study was performed with the Discovery
           2.1. Materials                                      Hybrid  HR20  Rheometer  (TA  instruments).  A  20  mm

           CNT  were  purchased  from  NanoLab  Inc.  (USA,  MA).   aluminum parallel plate was used for the measurements.
           MWCNT have a purity >85%, diameter 10 – 30 nm, and   A  temperature  sweep analysis was performed  in two
           length 5 – 20 µm. BCNT have a purity >85%, diameter 10   ranges:  120  –  40°C  and  50  –  80°C.  For  both  ranges,
           – 30 nm, and length 5 – 20 µm. PCL used in this work was   the  temp.  step  was  set  to  2°C,  1%  strain,  and  angular
           in powder (~50 000 MW, Polysciences Europe GmbH).   frequency at 10 rad/s. The soak time was set to 30 s. A flow
           LIVE/DEAD Viability/Cytotoxicity Kit for mammalian   sweep analysis was performed at three temperatures:
           cells (Invitrogen) was also used in this study.     180°C, 120°C, and 60°C. The range of shear rate was set
                                                               from 1 × 10 1/s to 500.0 1/s, at logarithmic step. Data
                                                                         −3
           2.2. Cell culture                                   were  analyzed  using  TA  Instruments  TRIOS  Software
           Human knee articular chondrocytes (NHAC-kn, Cat No:   version 5.1.1.46572.
           CC-2550,  LONZA)  were  cultured  in  DMEM/F12  with   2.7. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC)
           L-glutamine  (Corning) supplemented  with 10% fetal
           bovine  serum  (FBS),  50  µg/mL 2-phospho-L-ascorbic   DSC analysis was performed on a DSC 8500 apparatus
           acid, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 µg/ml streptomycin at   (Perkin Elmer) in the temperature range of −90 – 180°C,
           standard  culture  conditions.  The  medium  was  changed   with  nitrogen  flow  (20  ml/min).  The  temperature
           every  3  days.  Cells  were  subcultured  at  80  –  90%   change rate was set at 10°C/min. The thermal history
           confluence  with  the  TrypLE  Express  Enzyme  (Gibco).   of  the  raw  material  was  erased  before  measurement.
           Chondrocytes up to the ninth passage and with cell   3D-printed grids were not subjected to thermal history
           viability above 95% were used for cell experiments.  erasure.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 2        71
   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84