Page 146 - IJB-8-3

Dual-Response Composite Hydrogels
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8602 30. Fan Y, Yue Z, Lucarelli E, et al., 2020, Hybrid Printing
20. Guo J, Li Q, Zhang R, et al., 2022, Loose Pre-cross-linking Using Cellulose Nanocrystals Reinforced GelMA/HAMA
Mediating Cellulose Self-assembly for 3D Printing Strong and Hydrogels for Improved Structural Integration. Adv Healthc
Tough Biomimetic Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules, 23:877-88. Mater, 9:2001410.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01330.s002 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202001410
21. Ye D, Yang P, Lei X, et al., 2018, Robust Anisotropic 31. Zhao H, Zhang Y, Liu Y, et al., 2021, In Situ Forming Cellulose
Cellulose Hydrogels Fabricated via Strong Self-aggregation Nanofibril-Reinforced Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for
Forces for Cardiomyocytes Unidirectional Growth. Chem Cartilage Regeneration. Biomacromolecules, 22:5097–107.
Mater, 30:5175–83. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.1c01063
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01799 32. Sun W, Starly B, Daly AC, et al., 2020, The Bioprinting
22. Zou J, Wu S, Chen J, et al., 2019, Highly Efficient Roadmap. Biofabrication, 12:022002.
and Environmentally Friendly Fabrication of Robust, https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158
Programmable, and Biocompatible Anisotropic, All- 33. Arab W, Kahin K, Khan Z, et al., 2019, Exploring
Cellulose, Wrinkle-Patterned Hydrogels for Cell Alignment. Nanofibrous Self-assembling Peptide Hydrogels using Mouse
Adv Mater, 31:1904762. Myoblast Cells for Three-dimensional Bioprinting and Tissue
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904762 Engineering Applications. Int J Bioprinting, 5:74–82.
23. Kong W, Wang C, Jia C, et al., 2021, Muscle-inspired Highly https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v5i2.198
Anisotropic, Strong, Ion-Conductive Hydrogels. Adv Mater, 34. Lin C, Wang Y, Huang Z, et al., 2021, Advances in Filament
33:1801934–41. Structure of 3D Bioprinted Biodegradable Bone Repair
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201801934 Scaffolds. Int J Bioprinting, 7:43–64.
24. Ma T, Lv L, Ouyang C, et al., 2021, Rheological Behavior https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i4.426
and Particle Alignment of Cellulose Nanocrystal and its 35. Zhang X, Liu Y, Zuo Q, et al., 2021, 3D Bioprinting of
Composite Hydrogels During 3D Printing. Carbohyd Polym, Biomimetic Bilayered Scaffold Consisting of Decellularized
253:117217. Extracellular Matrix and Silk Fibroin for Osteochondral
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.117217 Repair. Int J Bioprinting, 7:85–98.
25. Fourmann O, Hausmann MK, Neels A, et al., 2021, 3D 36. Zheng C, Attarilar S, Li K, et al., 2021, 3D-printed HA15-
Printing of Shape-morphing and Antibacterial Anisotropic loaded Beta-Tricalcium Phosphate/Poly (Lactic-co-glycolic
Nanocellulose Hydrogels. Carbohydr Polym, 259:117716–27. acid) Bone Tissue Scaffold Promotes Bone Regeneration in
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.117716 Rabbit Radial Defects. Int J Bioprinting, 7:100–11.
26. Collins MN, Birkinshaw C, 2013, Hyaluronic Acid Based https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i1.317
scaffolds for Tissue Engineering a Review. Carbohyd Polym, 37. Guo Z, Mi S, Sun W, 2019, A Facile Strategy for Preparing
92:1262–79. Tough, Self-Healing Double-Network Hyaluronic Acid
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028 Hydrogels Inspired by Mussel Cuticles. Macromol Mater
27. Gwak MA, Hong BM, Seok JM, et al., 2021, Effect of Tannic Eng, 304(4):1800715–22.
Acid on the Mechanical and Adhesive Properties of Catechol- https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.201800715
modified Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels. Int J Biol Macromol, 38. Li Y, Yu P, Wen J, et al., 2022, Nanozyme-based Stretchable
191:699–705. Hydrogel of Low Hysteresis with Antibacterial and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.09.123 Antioxidant Dual Functions for Closely Fitting and Wound
28. Shin J, Lee JS, Lee C, et al., 2015, Tissue Adhesive Catechol- Healing in Movable Parts. Adv Funct Mater, 32:2110720–33.
Modified Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Effective, Minimally https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202110720
Invasive Cell Therapy. Adv Funct Mater, 25:3814–24. 39. Zhang J, Wu J, Yu J, et al., 2017, Application of Ionic Liquids
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201500006 for Dissolving Cellulose and Fabricating Cellulose-based
29. Xavier Acasigua GA, de Olyveira GM, Manzine Costa LM, Materials: State of the Art and Future Trends. Mater Chem
et al., 2014, Novel Chemically Modified Bacterial Cellulose Front, 1:1273–90.
Nanocomposite as Potential Biomaterial for Stem Cell https://doi.org/10.1039/c6qm00348f
Therapy Applications. Curr Stem Cell Res T, 9:117–23. 40. Mouser VH, Abbadessa A, Levato R, et al., 2017,
https://doi.org/10.2174/1574888x08666131124135654 Development of a Thermosensitive HAMA-containing

138 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3