Page 145 - IJB-8-3
P. 145

Dong, et al.
           The injectable, oriented, and dual-responsive hydrogels   8.   De France KJ, Hoare Tand Cranston E D, 2017, Review of
           were composed  of natural  and bioextractive  materials   Hydrogels and  Aerogels Containing  Nanocellulose.  Chem
           and exhibited good biocompatibility, which is essential   Mater, 29:4609–31.
           for biofabrication.  In summary, our work provides a      https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.7b00531
           new printable ink with characteristics such as structure   9.   Ravanbakhsh H, Bao G, Luo Z, et al., 2021, Composite
           orientation,  dual-responsiveness  (temperature  and  UV),
           and biocompatibility, which will promote the exploration   Inks for Extrusion Printing of Biological and Biomedical
           of highly-oriented biological tissue repair.            Constructs. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 7:4009–26.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c01158
           Acknowledgment                                      10.  Tashiro K, Kobayashi  M, 1991,  Theoretical  Evaluation  of
           The authors acknowledge financial support from the Tsin-  3-Dimensional Elastic-constants of Native and Regenerated
           ghua Berkeley Shenzhen Institute and the Project of Basic   Celluloses-role of Hydrogen-bonds. Polymer, 32:1516–30.
           Research of Shenzhen, China (JCYJ20170412101508433      https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(91)90435-l
           and JCYJ20180507183655307).
                                                               11.  Mueller M, Ozturk E, Arlov O, et al., 2017, Alginate Sulfate-
           Funding                                                 Nanocellulose Bioinks for Cartilage Bioprinting Applications.
                                                                   Ann Biomed Eng, 45:210–23.
           The research reported in this publication  was          https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-016-1704-5
           supported by funding from the  Tsinghua Berkeley
           Shenzhen Institute  and the Project  of Basic Research   12.  Chinga-Carrasco G, 2018, Potential  and Limitations  of
           of  Shenzhen,  China  (JCYJ20170412101508433  and       Nanocelluloses as Components in Biocomposite  Inks for
           JCYJ20180507183655307).                                 Three-Dimensional Bioprinting and for Biomedical Devices.
           Conflict of interest                                    Biomacromolecules, 19:701–11.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.8b00053
           The authors declare no competing financial interest.  13.  Yadav S, Majumder A, 2021, Biomimicked Hierarchical 2D

           References                                              and 3D Structures from Natural Templates: Applications in
                                                                   Cell Biology. Biomed Mater, 16:7.
           1.   Powers DB, Breeze J, 2019, Avulsive Soft Tissue Injuries.      https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-605x/ac21a7
               Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin, 27:135–42.     14.  Hua M, Wu S, Ma Y, et al., 2021, Strong Tough Hydrogels
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cxom.2019.05.005          Via the Synergy of Freeze-casting and Salting Out. Nature,
           2.   Brown BN, Badylak SF, 2014, Extracellular  Matrix as an   590:594–9.
               Inductive  Scaffold  for  Functional  Tissue  Reconstruction.      https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03212-z
               Transl Res, 163:268–85.                         15.  Zhang H, Cooper AI, 2007, Aligned  Porous Structures  by
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trsl.2013.11.003          Directional Freezing. Adv Mater, 19:1529–33.
           3.   Lee KY, Mooney DJ, 2001, Hydrogels for Tissue Engineering.      https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200700154
               Chem Rev, 101:1869–79.                          16.  Liu  M,  Ishida  Y,  Ebina  Y, et al.,  2015, An Anisotropic
           4.   Zhang  YS,  Khademhosseini  A,  2017,  Advances  in   Hydrogel with Electrostatic  Repulsion between Cofacially
               Engineering Hydrogels. Science, 356:eaaf3627.       Aligned Nanosheets. Nature, 517:68–72.
           5.   Hoffman AS, 2012, Hydrogels for Biomedical Applications.      https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14060
               Adv Drug Deliver Rev, 64:18–23.                 17.  Kuo JC, Huang HW, Tung SW, et al., 2014, A Hydrogel-based
           6.   Tavakolian M, Jafari SM, van de Ven TG, 2020, A Review   Intravascular  Microgripper Manipulated  using Magnetic
               on  Surface-Functionalized  Cellulosic  Nanostructures  Fields. Sensor Actuat Phys, 211:121–30.
               as Biocompatible  Antibacterial  Materials.  Nano-Micro      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2014.02.028
               Lett, 12:73.                                    18.  Shikinaka  K,  Koizumi  Y,  Kaneda  K,  et  al.,  2013,  Strain-
               https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-0408-4           induced Reversible Isotropic-anisotropic Structural Transition
           7.   Hai Van H, Makkar P, Padalhin AR, et al., 2020, Preliminary   of Imogolite Hydrogels. Polymer, 54:2489–92.
               Studies on the  in Vivo  Performance  of  Various  Kinds  of      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2013.03.028
               Nanocellulose for Biomedical Applications. J Biomater Appl,   19.  Shao JJ,  Raidongia K,  Koltonow  AR, et al., 2015, Self-
               34:942–51.                                          assembled  Two-dimensional  Nanofluidic  Proton  Channels
               https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328219883478            with High Thermal Stability. Nat Commun, 6:7602–2.

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3       137
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150