Page 152 - IJB-8-3
P. 152

3D-bioprinted HERS-DPCs for Alveolar Bone Regeneration
           culturing for 1, 4, and 7 days. According to the statistical   arrow) and proliferated since day 3.  To evaluate the
           results (Figure  2C), the  cells encapsulated  in  GelMA   cells  proliferation,  cell  number  and  cell  confluence
           showed high viability (all over 80% on days 1, 4, and 7)   were calculated (Figure 4D and E). The number and
           and GelMA was proved biocompatible in 3D bioprinting.  confluence  of  cells  increased  significantly,  indicating
                                                               rapid cell proliferation at this stage.
           3.3. HERS-DPCs interaction
           To observe the interaction of HERS cells and DPCs in   3.5. Alveolar socket transplantation in SD rats
           the 3D-printed GelMA scaffold in vitro, HERS cells were   In the process of alveolar socket transplantation in SD rats,
           marked red and DPCs were marked green (Figure 3A).   we first exposed the right posterior area of maxillary bone
           Next, we recorded the confocal images on day 0, day 3,   clearly (Figure 4F, a) and took a digital X-ray film before
           and day 8.  The results indicate  that HERS cells and   tooth extraction (Figure 4G, a). Then the first and second
           DPCs migrated to each other along the scaffold on day 8   molars were extracted completely (Figure 4F, b and c)
           (Figure 3B and Figure S3). The corresponding 3D videos   before mechanical preparation of the alveolar bone defect
           of printed constructs were shown in Figures S4-S6 and   (Figure  4F, d).  After transplanting  the constructs, the
           the graph schema showed the migration of the two kinds   oral mucosa and skin were tightened with layered sutures
           of cells (Figure 3C).                               (Figure 4F, e and f). At last, a digital X-ray film was
                                                               taken after operation (Figure 4G, b).
           3.4. Microscopic observation of printed
           construct                                           3.6. Histological and immunohistochemical
           The staggered grid structure of GelMA hydrogel      analysis of transplantation in vivo
           scaffold  was  observed  under  optical  and  scanning   The  HE  and  Masson  staining  marked  plenty  of  newly
           electron microscopy (Figure  4A-C). Besides, cells   formed  collagen  fiber  in  the  operation  area  of  all  groups
           crawled  out  from  the  scaffold  (Figure  4C, red   (Figure  5).  The blank group, compared to other groups,
                        A                                                C










                        B


























           Figure 2. Isolation, culture, identification, and viability of HERS cells. (A) The isolation, culture, and identification of primary HERS cells.
           HERS cells expressed both epithelial marker CK14 and mesenchymal marker vimentin. (B) Live/dead images of HERS cells encapsulated
           in GelMA hydrogel on days 1, 4, and 7. BF: Bright field; Merge 1, merge of Live and Dead images; Merge 2, merge of live, dead, and BF
           images. (C) Quantitative analysis of cell viability,  P < 0.001. HERS: Hertwig’s epithelial root sheath, GelMA: Gelatin methacrylate.
                                               ∗∗∗
           144                         International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157