Page 185 - IJB-8-3
P. 185

He, et al.
           and assembled into complex heterogeneous architectures ,   co-printing  with  human  umbilical  vein  endothelial
                                                         [2]
           and abundant  cell-cell  and cell-extracellular  matrix   cells and adipose-derived stem cells, the phenotype and
           (ECM) interactions have been established in bioprinted   biofunction of hiPSC-HPCs were found to be enhanced in
           cell-laden  structures.  These characteristics  could meet   long-term culture. In addition, spheroid-based bioprinting
           the demands of liver tissue engineering. Hepatocytes, as   has been shown to possess unique advantages in terms
           parenchymal cells of the liver, are attachment-dependent   of biological characteristics of the spheroids . Higher
                                                                                                     [16]
           and require close interactions with other liver cells and   cell viability and better maintenance of hepatic function
           within  specific  hepatic  microenvironments . The  rapid   have  been  shown  in  bioprinted  hepatoblast  spheroids
                                               [3]
           loss of the  normal  phenotype and biological  function   compared  to bioprinted  hepatoblasts  using single-cell
           of hepatocytes occurs in conventional two-dimensional   dispersion. However, most current studies use midterm-
           (2D)  cultures;  however,  hepatic  tissue  models  created   differentiated hepatoblasts or HPCs in bioprinting, which
           by  3D  bioprinting  have  been  shown  to  better  facilitate   are  involved  in  long-term,  post-printing  differentiation.
           the phenotype restoration  and function preservation  of   Methods  for  in  vitro  differentiation  into  hepatocytes
           hepatocytes, showing great superiority over 2D cultures .  through bioprinting remain  relatively  underdeveloped.
                                                         [4]
               To date, bioprinted hepatic tissue models have been   The  bioprinting  process  and  bioink  components  could
           widely  used  for  disease  modeling [5,6] , drug screening ,   potentially  affect  the  differentiation  efficiency  of  the
                                                         [7]
           hepatotoxicity evaluation [8-10] , and tissue regeneration [11,12] .   cells, which needs to be optimized and standardized for
           Hepatocytes used in bioprinting mainly include      successful bioprinting, and fully matured hepatocytes
           hepatocarcinoma cell lines, primary human hepatocytes   are required to construct hepatic tissue models for drug
           (PHHs) [11,13] , and hepatocytes derived  from human-  screening  and  toxicological  studies .  In  our  previous
                                                                                             [25]
           induced  pluripotent  stem cells (hiPSCs) [14-16] . Among   study, we developed an effective differentiation system
           hepatocarcinoma  cell  lines, HepG2 [8,17-19] , Huh-7 ,   to generate large quantities of mature hepatocytes from
                                                        [20]
           and HepaRG [5,9,12]  are commonly used in hepatic tissue   hiPSCs . Therefore, we considered maturating hiPSC-
                                                                     [26]
           models; however, these hepatoma cells cannot adequately   HPCs  based  on  our  well-developed  differentiation
           represent typical hepatocytes because of a deficiency in   protocol  and then applied  functional  hepatocytes  in
           liver-specific  functions . PHHs  isolated  from native   the bioprinting  of hepatic  tissue models. hiPSC-Heps
                               [21]
           liver tissue express excellent biofunctions but are   obtained using our optimized protocol showed excellent
           difficult to culture and expand in vitro. hiPSC lines are   expression  of  liver-specific  functions  similar  to  PHHs,
           capable of self-renewal. They can be expanded in vitro   and they were successfully applied in bioartificial liver
           on a large scale and converted into hepatocyte-like cells   systems for acute liver failure treatment [26,27] .
           through certain differentiation processes [22,23] . At present,   In  this  study,  we  bioprinted  hiPSC-Heps  using
           most  of  the  hepatocyte-like  cells  derived  from  hiPSCs   an  alginate-gelatin  bioink  to  construct  a  hepatic  tissue
           retain a relatively immature phenotype and express   model.  We  evaluated  the  success  of  cell  growth,  liver-
           limited  metabolic  functions compared to PHHs .    specific function, and drug-induced hepatotoxicity of the
                                                        [24]
           Nonetheless,  hiPSCs  could  be  a  promising  renewable   3D-printed (3DP) model compared with the conventional
           and easily accessible cell  source for the generation  of   2D-cultured (2D) and the non-printed sandwich-cultured
           functional  hepatocytes  which  may  obtain  full  maturity   (SW) models. The results of this study demonstrated the
           with  the  application  of  future  biotechnologies.  When   feasibility of hiPSC-Heps bioprinting using an alginate-
           applied in the bioprinting of hepatic tissue models using   gelatin bioink and confirmed that using the 3DP model
           proper  printing  techniques  and  bioinks,  hiPSC-derived   showed biofunctional superiority, thus providing potential
           hepatocytes  (hiPSC-Heps)  have  demonstrated  well-  applications in the prediction of drug-induced liver injury.
           maintained  cellular  phenotypes and biofunctions .
                                                        [25]
           Bioprinting of hiPSCs and human embryonic stem cells   2. Materials and methods
           was first reported in 2015 by Faulkner-Jones et al.  The   2.1. Cell culture and bioink preparation
                                                     [14]
           cells were bioprinted using RGD-coupled alginate bioink
           and then were further differentiated into hepatocyte-like   The cell differentiation timeline from hiPSCs to hiPSC-
           cells.  During  the  differentiation  process  after  printing,   Heps is shown in Figure 1A. hiPSC-Heps were obtained
           the cells retained pluripotency with positive hepatocyte   according  to the manufacturer’s protocol ,  in  which,
                                                                                                   [27]
           nuclear  factor  4 alpha  expressions, and they  displayed   hiPSCs  were  cultured  in  RPMI1640  medium  with  a
           biological functions and cellular morphology similar to   combination  of  Activin  A,  BMP4,  bFGF, B27, and
           functional hepatocytes. In another study by Ma et al. ,   Wnt3a  for  1  day  (24  h),  and  transferred  to  RPMI1640
                                                        [15]
           hiPSC-derived  hepatic  progenitor  cells  (hiPSC-HPCs)   medium  with  a  combination  of Activin A,  BMP4,  and
           were bioprinted into biomimetic hepatic lobule patterns   bFGF for 3 days to induce differentiation into definitive
           using digital  light processing-based 3D printing.  In   endoderm cells. Subsequently, the endoderm cells were

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3       177
   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190