Page 80 - IJB-8-3
P. 80

Protein Nanoparticles Promote Cell Growth in 3D Bioprinted Constructs
           was then placed on top of a heat-bed set to 40°C to create   2.10. Cytoskeletal staining and imaging
           a suitable temperature environment for the cells.   Immunostaining  was performed at each  culture  time
               Three syringe pumps were set up to dispense
           homogenous  gel  and  extrude  peptide  bioink  through   point.  In  brief,  the  cells  were  fixed  with  4%  (v/v)
                                                               paraformaldehyde solution for 30 min and incubated in a
           the  nozzle.  The  first  syringe  pump  was  loaded  with   cold cytoskeleton buffer (3 mM MgCl , 300 mM sucrose,
           peptide solution and set to a flow rate of 55 μL/min.   and 0.5% [v/v] Triton X-100 in PBS solution) for 5 min
                                                                                              2
           The second pump was loaded with ×7 PBS and set to   to permeabilize the cell membranes. The permeabilized
           a flow rate of 20 μL/min. The third pump was loaded   cells were then incubated in blocking buffer solution (5%
           with  the  cells  and  set  to  a  flow  rate  of  20  μL/min.   FBS, 0.1% (v/v)  Tween-20, and 0.02% [w/v] sodium
           Three samples of the 4-layer rectangular prism were   azide in PBS) for 30 min at 37°C. For F-Actin, anti-mouse
           printed for each condition with a height of 1.5 mm per   IgG  (whole molecule)-FITC and rhodamine-phalloidin
           sample to facilitate imaging. The same procedure was   (1:300) were added to the cells for 1 h. Further, the cells
           conducted for samples without gas vesicles to serve as   were incubated  in DAPI for 5  min to counterstain  the
           controls.                                           nucleus. The fluorescent dye-treated cells were observed

           2.8. 3D cell proliferation assay                    and imaged using a laser scanning confocal microscope
                                                               (Zeiss LSM 710 Inverted Confocal).
           The CellTiter-Glo® luminescent 3D cell viability assay
           was used to assess cell proliferation in 3D hydrogels by   2.11. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
           measuring ATP production. At each time  point, the kit   The  printed  samples were characterized  using SEM to
           was equilibrated at room temperature for approximately   visualize the morphology of the peptide bioink and gas
           30 min. CellTiter-Glo® Reagent equal to the volume of   vesicles in printed samples . Samples were printed on
                                                                                      [50]
           cell culture medium present in each well was added. The   18 × 18 mm glass coverslips and given time to solidify
           contents were mixed for 5 min to digest the hydrogels   before dehydration by gradual immersion in increasing
           and then incubated  for 30  min.  After incubation,   concentrations of 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% (v/v)
           the  luminescence  was recorded  using a plate  reader   ethanol  solutions for 5  min in each solution. Further
           (PHERAstar FS, Germany).                            dehydration  in 100% ethanol  solution  was done by
           2.9. Live/dead staining                             changing the absolute ethanol solution with a fresh ethanol
                                                               solution twice for 5 min each, followed by a third time
           HEK293 cells were seeded into peptide according to the   for 2 h. Dehydrated samples were subsequently placed
           protocol described above. After one, three, and 7 days   into the critical point dryer (Sorvall Critical Point Drying
           of incubation, the media was removed and replaced   System) for evaporation before being mounted onto SEM
           with PBS containing approximately 2 mM calcein AM   aluminum pin stubs with double-stick conductive carbon
           and 4 mM ethidium homodimer-1 before incubation     tape  and  a  final  sputter  coating  of  10  nm  of  iridium.
           for 40  min. Before imaging, the staining solution was   Images were taken with FEI Magellan XHR SEM. This
           removed, and fresh PBS was added. Stained cells were   was done with a TLD detector, and imaging parameters
           imaged under an inverted confocal microscope (Zeiss   included a current of 50 pA, a high voltage of 3.00 kV, and
           LSM 710 Inverted Confocal Microscope, Germany). The   a working distance of 4.0 m. Biological peptide hydrogel
           percentage of living cells was obtained through analysis   coating cells were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde
           with ImageJ.                                        (diluted from 25%) in water overnight at 4°C, the post-


                        A                               B               C














           Figure 1. (A and B) Image of the 3D bioprinter setup used for experiments conducted in this study and (C) a preview of the gcode file of
           the printed structure with dimensions measuring 10 mm × 10 mm × 1.5 mm.

           72                          International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 3
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85