Page 149 - IJB-8-4
P. 149

Cardoza, et al.
           award.  The  content  is  solely  the  responsibility  of  the   9.   Han B, Dong Y, Zhang L, et al., 2017, Dopamine Signaling
           authors  and  does  not  necessarily  represent  the  official   Tunes Spatial  Pattern  Selectivity  in  C. elegans.  Elife,
           views of the National Institutes of Health.             6:e22896.
           Conflict of interest                                    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22896
                                                               10.  Bilbao A, Patel AK, Rahman M, et al., 2018, Roll Maneuvers
           The authors declare no conflicts of interest.           are Essential  for  Active Reorientation  of  Caenorhabditis
           Author contributions                                    elegans in 3D Media. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 115:E3616–25
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.170675411
           Conceptualization: Eleni Gourgou                    11.  Shaw M, Zhan H, Elmi M, et al., 2018, Three-dimensional
           Investigation: Steel Cardoza, Eleni Gourgou             Behavioural  Phenotyping  of  Freely  Moving  C. elegans
           Methodology:  Steel  Cardoza,  Lai  Yu  Leo  Tse,  Kira
              Barton, Eleni Gourgou                                using  Quantitative  Light  Field  Microscopy.  PLoS One,
           Formal analysis: Steel Cardoza, Eleni Gourgou           13:e0200108.
           Visualization: Steel Cardoza, Eleni Gourgou             https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200108
           Funding acquisition: Eleni Gourgou                  12.  Kwon N, Hwang AB, You YJ, et al., 2015, Dissection of C.
           Writing-review and editing: Lai Yu Leo Tse, Kira Barton,   elegans Behavioral Genetics in 3-D Environments. Sci Rep,
              Eleni Gourgou                                        5:9564.
           Writing-first draft: Steel Cardoza, Eleni Gourgou
                                                               13.  Kwon N, Pyo J, Lee SJ, et al., 2013, 3-D Worm Tracker for
           References                                              Freely Moving C. elegans. PloS One, 8:e57484.
                                                                   https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0057484
           1.   Tissenbaum HA, 2015, Using C. elegans for Aging Research.   14.  Li H, Tan C, Li L, 2018, Review of 3D Printable Hydrogels
               Invertebr Reprod Dev, 59:59–63.                     and Constructs. Mater Des, 159:20–38.
               https://doi.org/10.1080/07924259.2014.940470        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2018.08.023
           2.   Corsi  AK,  Wightman  B,  Chalfie  M,  2015,  A  Transparent   15.  Li J, Wu C, Chu PK, et al., 2020, 3D Printing of Hydrogels:
               Window into Biology: A Primer on Caenorhabditis elegans.   Rational  Design  Strategies  and  Emerging  Biomedical
               Genetics, 200:387–407.                              Applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep, 140:100543.
               https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.176099         https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2020.100543
           3.   Kaletta T, Hengartner MO, 2006, Finding Function in Novel   16.  Spicer CD, 2020, Hydrogel Scaffolds for Tissue Engineering:
               Targets:  C. elegans  as  a  Model  Organism.  Nat Rev Drug   The Importance of Polymer Choice. Polym Chem, 11:184–219.
               Discov, 5:387–99.                                   https://doi.org/10.1039/C9PY01021A
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2031                 17.  Unagolla  JM,  Jayasuriya  AC,  2020,  Hydrogel-based  3D
           4.   Rankin  CH,  Beck  CD,  Chiba  CM,  1990,  Caenorhabditis   Bioprinting:  A  Comprehensive  Review  on  Cell-Laden
               elegans: A New Model System for the Study of Learning and   Hydrogels,  Bioink  Formulations,  and  Future  Perspectives.
               Memory. Behav Brain Res, 37:89–92.                  Appl Mater Today, 18:100479.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4328(90)90074-o        https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.100479
           5.   Frézal L, Félix MA, 2015, C. elegans Outside the Petri Dish.   18.  Stein  GM,  Murphy  CT,  2012,  The  Intersection  of  Aging,
               Elife, 4:e05849.                                    Longevity  Pathways,  and  Learning  and  Memory  in  C.
               https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05849                 elegans. Front Genet, 3:259.
           6.   Stiernagle  T,  2006,  Maintenance  of  C. elegans.  Pasadena,      https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00259
               CA: WormBook In: WormBook.                      19.  Glenn  CF,  Chow  DK,  David  L, et al., 2004, Behavioral
           7.   Gourgou  E,  Adiga  K,  Goettemoeller  A,  et  al.,  2021,   Deficits  During  Early  Stages  of  Aging  in  Caenorhabditis
               Caenorhabditis elegans Learning in a Structured Maze is a   elegans Result From Locomotory Deficits Possibly Linked to
               Multisensory Behavior. iScience, 24:102284.         Muscle Frailty. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci, 59:1251–60.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102284          https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/59.12.1251
           8.   Gourgou  E,  Hsu  AL,  2021,  A  Maze  Platform  for  the   20.  Golden  TR,  Hubbard  A,  Dando  C, et al.,  2008, Age-
               Assessment  of  Caenorhabditis elegans Behavior and   related  Behaviors  have  Distinct  Transcriptional  Profiles  in
               Learning. STAR Protoc, 2:100829.                    Caenorhabditis elegans. Aging Cell, 7:850–65.
               https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100829          https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00433.x

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4       141
   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154