Page 150 - IJB-8-4

3D Arenas for C. elegans Behavior
21. Tahernia M, Mohammadifar M, Choi S, 2020, Paper-supported J Bioact Compat Polym, 20:259–69.
High-throughput 3D Culturing, Trapping, and Monitoring of https://doi.org/10.1177/0883911505053658
Caenorhabditis elegans. Micromachines (Basel), 11:99. 33. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current Advances and Future
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11010099 Perspectives in Extrusion-based Bioprinting. Biomaterials,
22. Lockery SR, Lawton KJ, Doll JC, et al., 2008, Artificial Dirt: 76:321–43.
Microfluidic Substrates for Nematode Neurobiology and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
Behavior. J Neurophysiol, 99:3136–43. 34. Kessel B, Lee M, Bonato A, et al., 2020, 3D Bioprinting
https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.91327.2007 of Macroporous Materials Based on Entangled Hydrogel
23. Lee TY, Yoon KH, Lee JI, 2016, Cultivation of Caenorhabditis Microstrands. Adv Sci, 7:2001419.
elegans in Three Dimensions in the Laboratory. J Vis Exp, 35. Stanton MM, Samitier J, Sánchez S, 2015, Bioprinting of 3D
118:55048. Hydrogels. Lab Chip, 15:3111–5.
https://doi.org/10.3791/55048 https://doi.org/10.1039/c5lc90069g
24. Jiang T, Munguia-Lopez JG, Flores-Torres S, et al., 2019, 36. Fan R, Piou M, Darling E, et al., 2016, Bio-printing Cell-laden
Extrusion Bioprinting of Soft Materials: An Emerging Technique Matrigel–agarose Constructs. J Biomater Appl, 31:684–92.
for Biological Model Fabrication. Appl Phys Rev, 6:011310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328216669238
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5059393 37. Fan D, Staufer U, Accardo A, 2019, Engineered 3D
25. Ng WL, Huang X, Shkolnikov V, et al., 2021, Controlling Polymer and Hydrogel Microenvironments for Cell Culture
Droplet Impact Velocity and Droplet Volume: Key Factors to Applications. Bioengineering (Basel), 6:113.
Achieving High Cell Viability in Sub-nanoliter Droplet-based https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering6040113
Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint, 8:424. 38. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, et al., 2014, Evaluation
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.424 of 3D Printing and its Potential Impact on Biotechnology and
26. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet Bioprinting of the Chemical Sciences. Anal Chem, 86:3240–53.
Biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120:10793–833. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac403397r
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008 39. Landers R, Hübner U, Schmelzeisen R, et al., 2002, Rapid
27. Zhuang P, Ng WL, An J, et al., 2019, Layer-by-layer Prototyping of Scaffolds Derived from Thermoreversible
Ultraviolet Assisted Extrusion-based (UAE) Bioprinting of Hydrogels and Tailored for Applications in Tissue
Hydrogel Constructs with High Aspect Ratio for Soft Tissue Engineering. Biomaterials, 23:4437–47.
Engineering Applications. PLoS One, 14:e0216776. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00139-4
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216776 40. White JG, Southgate E, Thomson JN, et al., 1986,
28. Li W, Mille LS, Robledo JA, et al., 2020, Recent Advances The Structure of the Nervous System of the Nematode
in Formulating and Processing Biomaterial Inks for Vat Caenorhabditis elegans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci,
Polymerization-based 3D Printing. Adv Healthc Mater, 314:1–340.
9:2000156. 41. Schulenburg H, Félix MA, 2017, The Natural Biotic
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202000156 Environment of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics, 206:55-86.
29. Tavana H, Mosadegh B, Takayama S, 2010, Polymeric https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.195511
Aqueous Biphasic Systems for Non-contact Cell Printing 42. Kauffman AL, Ashraf JM, Corces-Zimmerman MR, et al.,
on Cells: Engineering Heterocellular Embryonic Stem Cell 2010, Insulin Signaling and Dietary Restriction Differentially
Niches. Adv Mater, 22:2628–31. Influence the Decline of Learning and Memory with Age.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200904271 PLoS Biol, 8:e1000372.
30. Chung JHY, Naficy S, Yue Z, et al., 2013, Bio-ink Properties https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000372
and Printability for Extrusion Printing Living Cells. Biomater 43. Hsu AL, Feng Z, Hsieh MY, et al., 2009, Identification by
Sci, 1:763–73. Machine Vision of the Rate of Motor Activity Decline as a
https://doi.org/10.1039/C3BM00012E Lifespan Predictor in C. elegans. Neurobiol Aging, 30:1498–503.
31. He Y, Yang F, Zhao H, et al., 2016, Research on the Printability https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.12.007
of Hydrogels in 3D Bioprinting. Sci Rep, 6:29977. 44. Newell Stamper BL, Cypser JR, Kechris K, et al., 2018,
32. Yan Y, Wang X, Xiong Z, et al., 2005, Direct Construction Movement Decline Across Lifespan of Caenorhabditis
of a Three-dimensional Structure with Cells and Hydrogel. elegans Mutants in the Insulin/Insulin-like Signaling

142 International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4