Page 45 - IJB-8-4
P. 45

Lu, et al.
            A                                 B                                C










           D                                  E                                F










           G                                  H
                                                                               I












           Figure 2. Compressive mechanical properties of PVA/dECM hydrogels. (A) Uniaxial stress-strain curves under compression until 80% of
           height. (B) Uniaxial compression-relaxation curves of PVA/dECM hydrogel group and control group. The compression-relaxation cycles of
           the same gel for 20 consecutive cycles without any time interval between two cycles, including control (C), 20-20 (D), 40-20 (E), and 120-
           20 (F) PVA/dECM hydrogel groups. (G) The normalized maximum compressive stress of the hydrogels in the 20 cycles. (H) The dissipation
           energy of the hydrogels in the 20 cycles. (I) The stress-relaxation of the hydrogels. The strain of each loading step increased by 10% in the
           range of 0 – 50%.
           recover the original shape after folding (Figure 3C)   3.5. Evaluation of meniscus regeneration
           and stretching (Figure 3D).                         After 12  weeks of implantation, the meniscus defects

           3.4. Biocompatibility test                          were  repaired  eminently  by  PVA/dECM  hydrogels.
                                                               Immunological rejection or synovial proliferation was
           HUVECs  were cultured on the surface of various     not observed in any of these groups.  The defective
           hydrogels at the same initial concentration  to assess   region of the PVA/dECM hydrogel group was covered
           the  biocompatibility  of the  materials.  The  results of   by glossy and smooth meniscus, which was close to the
           the Calcein/PI  staining  and phalloidine/DAPI  staining   natural meniscus. In the control and blank groups, the
           showed an  obvious  adhesion  morphology  and  a  large   defects were filled with regenerated tissues, which were
           number of living cells in the PVA/dECM hydrogel group   irregular, depressive, and clearly distinguishable from
           and control group (Figure 4 and Figure S15-S16).    the surrounding meniscus (Figure  5A). The  ImageJ
           As shown in Figure S17, although the cell viability of   software showed that the regeneration area of the PVA/
           hydrogel  groups decreased  after  48  h  of  culture,  there   dECM  meniscus  was  significantly  larger  than  that  in
           are still a large number of living cells on the hydrogel   the  control  and  blank  groups  (Table  1).  Meanwhile,
                                                               the contact surface between femur and tibial plateau in
           surface. Alkali treatment and freeze-thaw cycle had little   the PVA/dECM hydrogel group was smooth without
           effect on cell compatibility. Overall, the above-mentioned   roughness. Obvious cartilage defects were observed in
           results revealed that PVA/dECM hydrogel group had a   the contact surface between femur and tibial plateau in
           promising biocompatibility, and it would be appropriate   the control and blank groups. The macroscopic scores
           for cell adhesion and proliferation, which could be used as   are presented in  Table  1.  The PVA/dECM hydrogel
           tissue engineering material for constructing and repairing   group  demonstrated  a  significant  increase  in  all  the
           meniscus.                                           assessments. In the ICRS scoring system, the cartilage in

                                       International Journal of Bioprinting (2022)–Volume 8, Issue 4        37
   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50