Page 125 - IJB-9-1
P. 125

International Journal of Bioprinting                     Fabrication of 3D breast tumor model for drug screening







































            Figure 2. Rheology characterization of Gel/SA/dECM bioinks. (A) Thermosensitivity. (B) Viscoelasticity. (C) Viscosity. Thixotropy of 4G2S1d (D), 4G3S1d
            (E), 5G3S1d (F), 6G3S1d (G), and 7G2S1d (H) were evaluated. (I) After gelatin and sodium alginate were added, the Gel/SA/dECM bioink turned more
            viscous as well as a little yellow compared to the dECM solution (inset), a white viscous liquid.

               The steady viscosity of several bioinks was  shown   alginate has a greater effect on improving the viscosity of
            in  Figure 2C. Generally speaking, the viscosity of each   the material than gelatin. Therefore, 5G3S1d, 6G3S1d, and
            material decreased with the increase of shear frequency,   7G2S1d were selected as bioinks for printing scaffolds with
            indicating that they were pseudoplastic fluids and shear   consideration of both rheological properties test results
            thinning fluids . The higher the material concentration,   and pre-printing results.
                        [53]
            the higher the fluid viscosity. In the test range shown in   Han  et al.  prepared porcine liver dECM solution
                                                                          [54]
            the figure, the maximum viscosity of 7G2S1d was 182.93   and collagen solution with concentrations of 1.5% and 3%,
            Pa, and the maximum viscosity of 4G2S1d was 15.91 Pa.   respectively, for 3D-printed tissue-engineered scaffolds.
            It was  found that the  higher the concentration was, the   In  the  shear  frequency  range  from  1  to  100  rad·s ,  the
                                                                                                        −1
            more stable the decrease rate of viscosity with the increase   maximum storage modulus of the two bioinks were no
            of shear frequency, indicating that scaffold constructed by   more than 1000 Pa. Compared with their bioinks, the
            the material with high concentration had a lower risk of   viscoelasticity  of  bioinks  in  our  study  exhibited  higher
            deformation or collapse after 3D printing.         viscoelasticity. In addition, during the shear rate range
               Thixotropy is a reversible sol rheological phenomenon   from 0 to 1000 s , the steady viscosity of the bioink with
                                                                            −1
            in which the viscosity and shear stress of the gel change   sodium alginate in our study was also higher than that of
            with time as a result of external forces such as oscillation,   pure collagen solution. It is suggested that the addition of
            agitation, and compression, reflecting the time dependence   gelatin and sodium alginate, two high-viscosity materials,
            of fluid viscosity. The area enclosed by the two curves formed   can  improve  the  stability  and  printability  of  bioink.
            by the change of fluid shear stress as a result of the increase   Compared with the dECM bioinks derived from porcine
            and decrease of shear rate is called thixotropic ring. The   fat, cartilage, and heart prepared by Pati et al. , the groups
                                                                                                  [33]
            larger the area of the thixotropic ring is, the stronger the   of bioinks prepared in our study had higher viscoelasticity
            time stability of the fluid is. As shown in Figure 2D–H,   and steady viscosity. After gelatin and sodium alginate
            the higher the bioink concentration was, the stronger the   were added, Gel/SA/dECM bioink turned more viscous as
            thixotropy was in general. The thixotropy of 6G3S1d was   well as a little yellow (Figure 2I) compared to the dECM
            stronger than that of 7G2S1d, possibly because sodium   solution (Figure 2I inset), a white viscous liquid.


            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                        117                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.630
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130