Page 137 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Fabrication of 3D breast tumor model for drug screening

49. Li W, Hu X, Yang S, et al., 2018, A novel tissue-engineered 3D C3A hepatocyte culture. J Biomater Sci, Polym Ed, 31(8):
tumor model for anti-cancer drug discovery. Biofabrication, 1041–1056.
11(1): 015004.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09205063.2020.1738690
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aae270
60. Lu S, Cuzzucoli F, Jiang J, et al., 2018, Development of
50. Mao S, He J, Zhao Y, et al., 2020, Bioprinting of patient- a biomimetic liver tumor-on-a-chip model based on
derived in vitro intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma tumor decellularized liver matrix for toxicity testing. Lab Chip,
model: Establishment, evaluation and anti-cancer drug 18(22): 3379–3392.
testing. Biofabrication, 12(4): 045014.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8lc00852c
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba0c3 61. Wang JZ, Zhu YX, Ma HC, et al., 2016, Developing multi-
51. Song K, Li L, Yan X, et al., 2017, Characterization of human cellular tumor spheroid model (MCTS) in the chitosan/
adipose tissue-derived stem cells in vitro culture and in vivo collagen/alginate (CCA) fibrous scaffold for anticancer drug
differentiation in a temperature-sensitive chitosan/beta- screening. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 62: 215–225.
glycerophosphate/collagen hybrid hydrogel. Mater Sci Eng C https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.01.045
Mater Biol Appl, 70(Pt 1): 231–240.
62. Sachlos E, Reis N, Ainsley C, et al., 2003, Novel collagen
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2016.08.085 scaffolds with predefined internal morphology made by
52. Ijima H, Nakamura S, Bual R, et al., 2018, Physical properties solid freeform fabrication. Biomaterials, 24(8): 1487–1497.
of the extracellular matrix of decellularized porcine liver. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00528-8
Gels, 4(2): 39.
63. Xu W, Qian J, Zhang Y, et al., 2016, A double-network
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels4020039 poly(Nvarepsilon-acryloyl L-lysine)/hyaluronic acid
53. Polley C, Mau R, Lieberwirth C, et al., 2017, Bioprinting of hydrogel as a mimic of the breast tumor microenvironment.
three dimensional tumor models: a preliminary study using Acta Biomater, 33: 131–141.
a low cost 3D printer. Curr Dir Biomed Eng, 3(2): 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2016.01.027
https://doi.org/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0028 64. Li X, Deng Q, Zhuang T, et al., 2020, 3D bioprinted breast
54. Lee H, Han W, Kim H, et al., 2017, Development of liver tumor model for structure–activity relationship study. Bio-
decellularized extracellular matrix bioink for three- Des Manuf, 3(4): 361–372.
dimensional cell printing-based liver tissue engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42242-020-00085-5
Biomacromolecules, 18(4): 1229–1237.
65. Peela N, Sam FS, Christenson W, et al., 2016, A three
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.6b01908 dimensional micropatterned tumor model for breast cancer
55. Chaji S, Al-Saleh J, Gomillion CT, 2020, Bioprinted three- cell migration studies. Biomaterials, 81: 72–83.
dimensional cell-laden hydrogels to evaluate adipocyte- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.11.039
breast cancer cell interactions. Gels, 6(1): 10.
66. Antunes J, Gaspar VM, Ferreira L, et al., 2019, In-air
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels6010010 production of 3D co-culture tumor spheroid hydrogels for
56. Lv K, Zhu J, Zheng S, et al., 2021, Evaluation of inhibitory expedited drug screening. Acta Biomater, 94: 392–409.
effects of geniposide on a tumor model of human breast https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.06.012
cancer based on 3D printed Cs/Gel hybrid scaffold. Mater
Sci Eng C, 119: 111509. 67. Li L, Qin S, Peng J, et al., 2020, Engineering gelatin-based
alginate/carbon nanotubes blend bioink for direct 3D
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111509 printing of vessel constructs. Int J Biol Macromol, 145:
57. Jeong W, Kim MK, Kang HW, 2021, Effect of detergent type 262–271.
on the performance of liver decellularized extracellular https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2019.12.174
matrix-based bio-inks. J Tissue Eng, 12: 1–14.
68. Xu K, Ganapathy K, Andl T, et al., 2019, 3D porous chitosan-
https://doi.org/10.1177/2041731421997091 alginate scaffold stiffness promotes differential responses in
prostate cancer cell lines. Biomaterials, 217: 119311.
58. Bordoni M, Karabulut E, Kuzmenko V, et al., 2020,
3D printed conductive nanocellulose scaffolds for the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119311
differentiation of human neuroblastoma cells. Cells, 9(3): 69. Mahmoudzadeh A, Mohammadpour H, 2016, Tumor cell
682.
culture on collagen-chitosan scaffolds as three-dimensional
https://doi.org/10.3390/cells9030682 tumor model: A suitable model for tumor studies. J Food
Drug Anal, 24(3): 620–626.
59. Zhao C, Li Y, Peng G, et al., 2020, Decellularized liver
matrix-modified chitosan fibrous scaffold as a substrate for https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfda.2016.02.008

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 129 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.630