Page 260 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of smart constructs for precise medicine

amniotic mesenchymal stem cells for intrauterine adhesion Biomater, 98: 160–170.
prevention. ACS Omega, 6: 23067–23075.
60. Khalil S, Sun W, 2007, Biopolymer deposition for freeform
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c02117 fabrication of hydrogel tissue constructs. Mater Sci Eng C,
49. Petta D, Armiento AR, Grijpma D, et al., 2018, 3D 27: 469–478.
bioprinting of a hyaluronan bioink through enzymatic-and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2006.05.023
visible light-crosslinking. Biofabrication, 10: 044104.
61. Kolesky DB, Truby RL, Gladman S, et al., 2014, 3D
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aadf58 bioprinting of vascularized, heterogeneous cell-laden tissue
50. Kim H, Kang B, Cui X, et al., 2021, Light-activated constructs. Adv Mater, 26: 2966–2966.
decellularized extracellular matrix-based bioinks for 62. Visser J, Peters B, J Burger T, et al., 2013, Biofabrication
volumetric tissue analogs at the centimeter scale. Adv Funct of multi-material anatomically shaped tissue constructs.
Mater, 31: 2011252. Biofabrication, 5: 035007.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202011252 https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5082/5/3/035007
51. Wang Y, Zhang S, Wang J, 2021, Photo-crosslinkable 63. Nerger BA, Brun PT, Nelson CM, 2019, Microextrusion
hydrogel and its biological applications. Chinese Chem Lett, printing cell-laden networks of type I collagen with
32: 1603–1614. patterned fiber alignment and geometry. Soft Matter, 15:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.11.073 5728–5738.
52. Pahoff S, Meinert C, Bas O, et al., 2019, Effect of gelatin source https://doi.org/10.1039/C8SM02605J
and photoinitiator type on chondrocyte redifferentiation 64. Gong J, Schuurmans CC, Genderen AM, et al., 2020,
in gelatin methacryloyl-based tissue-engineered cartilage Complexation-induced resolution enhancement of
constructs. J Mater Chem B, 7: 1761–1772. 3D-printed hydrogel constructs. Nat Commun, 11: 1267.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c8tb02607f https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14997-4

53. Lim KS, Schon BS, Mekhileri NV, et al., 2016, New visible- 65. Schwab A, Hélary C, Richards RG, et al., 2020, Tissue
light photoinitiating system for improved print fidelity in mimetic hyaluronan bioink containing collagen fibers
gelatin-based bioinks. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 2: 1752–1762. with controlled orientation modulating cell migration and
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00149 alignment. Mater Today Bio, 7: 100058.
54. Wang Z, Kumar H, Tian Z, et al., 2018, Visible light https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2020.100058
photoinitiation of cell-adhesive gelatin methacryloyl 66. Sakiyama-Elbert S, Hubbell J, 2001, Functional biomaterials:
hydrogels for stereolithography 3D bioprinting. ACS Appl Design of novel biomaterials. Ann Rev Mater Res, 31: 183–201.
Mater Interfaces, 10: 26859–26869.
67. He Y, Guo S, Liu Z, et al., 2015, Pattern transformation of
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b06607 thermo-responsive shape memory polymer periodic cellular
55. Bernal P N, Delrot P, Loterie D, et al., 2019, volumetric structures. Int J Solids Struct, 71: 194–205.
bioprinting of complex living-tissue constructs within 68. Chen Q, Chen H, Zhu L, et al., 2015, Fundamentals of
seconds. Adv Mater, 31: 1904209. double network hydrogels. J Mater Chem B, 3: 3654–3676.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904209 69. Haque MA, Kurokawa T, Gong JP, 2012, Super tough double
56. Guillotin B, Souquet A, Catros S, et al., 2010, Laser assisted network hydrogels and their application as biomaterials.
bioprinting of engineered tissue with high cell density and Polymer, 53: 1805–1822.
microscale organization. Biomaterials, 31: 7250–7256. 70. Li G, Zhang H, Fortin D, et al., 2015, Poly (vinyl alcohol)–
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.05.055 poly (ethylene glycol) double-network hydrogel: A general
approach to shape memory and self-healing functionalities.
57. Murphy SV, Skardal A, Atala A, 2013, Evaluation of Langmuir, 31: 11709–11716.
hydrogels for bio-printing applications. J Biomed Mater Res
A, 101: 272–284. 71. Wang D, Guo J, Zhang H, et al., 2015, Intelligent rubber with
tailored properties for self-healing and shape memory. J
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.34326
Mater Chem A, 3: 12864–12872.
58. Khalil S, Wei SJ, 2007, Biopolymer deposition for freeform https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ta01915j
fabrication of hydrogel tissue constructs. Mater Sci Eng C,
27: 469–478. 72. Liu J, Huang Y, Kumar A, et al., 2014, pH-sensitive nano-
systems for drug delivery in cancer therapy. Biotechnol Adv,
59. Chang CC, Boland ED, Williams SK, et al., 2011, Direct-
write bioprinting three-dimensional biohybrid systems for 32: 693–710.
future regenerative therapies. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl 73. Zhuo S, Zhang F, Yu J, et al., 2020, pH-sensitive biomaterials

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 252 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.638