Page 262 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of smart constructs for precise medicine

biology. Cell Stem Cell. 29: 678–691. hyaluronate, and iron oxide nanoparticles. Carbohydr
Polym, 245: 116496.
100. Zheng Y, Chen Z, Jiang Q, et al., 2020, Near-infrared-light
regulated angiogenesis in a 4D hydrogel. Nanoscale, 12: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116496
13654–13661.
114. Guo Z, Dong L, Xia J, et al., 2021, 3D printing unique
101. Gandavarapu NR, Azagarsamy MA, Anseth KS, 2014, nanoclay‐incorporated double‐network hydrogels for
Photo‐click living strategy for controlled, reversible construction of complex tissue engineering scaffolds. Adv
exchange of biochemical ligands. Adv Mater, 26: 2521–2526. Healthc Mater, 10: e2100036.
102. Wylie RG, Ahsan S, Aizawa Y, et al., 2011, Spatially controlled https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202100036
simultaneous patterning of multiple growth factors in three- 115. Distler T, Polley C, Shi F, et al., 2021, Electrically conductive
dimensional hydrogels. Nat Mater, 10: 799–806.
and 3D‐printable oxidized alginate‐gelatin polypyrrole: PSS
https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat3101 hydrogels for tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 10:
2001876.
103. Hammer JA, West JL, 2018, Dynamic ligand presentation in
biomaterials. Bioconjug Chem, 29: 2140–2149. 116. Siebert L, Luna‐Cerón E, García‐Rivera LE, et al., 2021,
Light‐controlled growth factors release on tetrapodal ZnO‐
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.8b00288
incorporated 3D‐printed hydrogels for developing smart
104. Chiriaco F, Conversano F, Soloperto G, et al., 2013, Epithelial wound scaffold. Adv Funct Mater, 31: 2007555.
cell biocompatibility of silica nanospheres for contrast-
enhanced ultrasound molecular imaging. J Nanoparticle Res, https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202007555
15: 1–13. 117. Maan Z, Masri NZ, Willerth SM, 2022, Smart bioinks for the
printing of human tissue models. Biomolecules, 12: 141.
105. Vo TN, Kasper FK, Mikos AG, 2012, Strategies for controlled
delivery of growth factors and cells for bone regeneration. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12010141
Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 64: 1292–1309.
118. Tiwari G, Tiwari R, Sriwastawa B, et al., 2012, Drug delivery
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2012.01.016 systems: An updated review. Int J Pharm Investig, 2: 2–11.
106. Huebsch N, Kearney CJ, Zhao X, et al., 2014, Ultrasound- https://doi.org/10.4103/2230-973X.96920
triggered disruption and self-healing of reversibly 119. Wang M, Li W, Tang G, et al., 2021, Engineering (bio)
cross-linked hydrogels for drug delivery and enhanced materials through shrinkage and expansion. Adv Healthc
chemotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 111: 9762–9767.
Mater, 10: 2100380.
107. Koetting MC, Peters JT, Steichen SD, et al., 2015, Stimulus- 120. Pawar AA, Saada G, Cooperstein I, et al., 2016, High-
responsive hydrogels: Theory, modern advances, and performance 3D printing of hydrogels by water-dispersible
applications. Mater Sci Eng R Rep, 93: 1–49.
photoinitiator nanoparticles. Sci Adv, 2: e1501381.
108. Habibi M, Foroughi S, Karamzadeh V, et al., 2022, Direct https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1501381
sound printing. Nat Commun, 13: 1800.
121. Melocchi A, Uboldi M, Maroni A, et al., 2020, 3D printing
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-29395-1
by fused deposition modeling of single-and multi-
109. Liu Z, Liu J, Cui X, et al., 2020, Recent advances on magnetic compartment hollow systems for oral delivery-a review. Int J
sensitive hydrogels in tissue engineering. Front Chem, 8: 124. Pharm, 579: 119155.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2020.00124 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119155
110. Manjua AC, Alves VD, Crespo JO, et al., 2019, Magnetic 122. Ceylan H, Yasa IC, Yasa O, et al., 2019, 3D-printed
responsive PVA hydrogels for remote modulation of protein biodegradable microswimmer for theranostic cargo delivery
sorption. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 11: 21239–21249. and release. ACS Nano, 13: 3353-3362.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b03146 https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b09233
111. Chen X, Fan M, Tan H, et al., 2019, Magnetic and self- 123. Trampe E, Koren K, Akkineni AR, et al., 2018,
healing chitosan-alginate hydrogel encapsulated gelatin Functionalized bioink with optical sensor nanoparticles
microspheres via covalent cross-linking for drug delivery. for O imaging in 3D‐bioprinted constructs. Adv Funct
2
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 101: 619–629. Mater, 28: 1804411.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.012 124. Iversen M, Monisha M, Agarwala S, 2022, Flexible, wearable
and fully-printed smart patch for pH and hydration sensing
112. Farzaneh S, Hosseinzadeh S, Samanipour R, et al., 2021,
MNP. J Drug Deliv Sci Technol, 64: 102525. in wounds. Int J Bioprint, 8: 447.
https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i1.447
113. Ko ES, Kim C, Choi Y, et al., 2020, 3D printing of self-
healing ferrogel prepared from glycol chitosan, oxidized 125. Dargaville TR, Farrugia BL, Broadbent JA, et al., 2013,

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 254 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.638