Page 265 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of smart constructs for precise medicine

170. Banche-Niclot F, Montalbano G, Fiorilli S, et al., 2021, PEG- 176. Wei H, Zhang Q, Yao Y, et al., 2017, Direct-write fabrication
coated large mesoporous silicas as smart platform for protein of 4D active shape-changing structures based on a shape
delivery and their use in a collagen-based formulation for memory polymer and its nanocomposite. ACS Appl Mater
3D printing. Int J Mol Sci, 22: 1718. Interfaces, 9: 876–883.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22041718 https://doi.org10.1021/acsami.6b12824
171. Okwuosa TC, Pereira BC, Arafat B, et al., 2017, Fabricating a 177. Zhang J, Zhao S, Zhu M, et al., 2014, 3D-printed
shell-core delayed release tablet using dual FDM 3D printing magnetic Fe3O4/MBG/PCL composite scaffolds with
for patient-centred therapy. Pharm Res, 34: 427–437. multifunctionality of bone regeneration, local anticancer
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-016-2073-3 drug delivery and hyperthermia. J Mater Chem B, 2: 7583–
7595.
172. Mirani B, Pagan E, Currie B, et al., 2017, An advanced
multifunctional hydrogel-based dressing for wound https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TB01063A
monitoring and drug delivery. Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 178. D’Amora U, Russo T, Gloria A, et al., 2017, 3D additive-
1700718.
manufactured nanocomposite magnetic scaffolds: Effect of
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201700718 the application mode of a time-dependent magnetic field on
173. Sayyar S, Bjorninen M, Haimi S, et al., 2016, UV cross-linkable hMSCs behavior. Bioactive Mater, 2: 138–145.
graphene/poly(trimethylene Carbonate) composites for 3D https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.04.003
printing of electrically conductive scaffolds. ACS Appl Mater
Interfaces, 8: 31916–31925. 179. Betsch M, Cristian C, Lin YY, et al., 2018, Incorporating 4D
into bioprinting: Real-time magnetically directed collagen
https://doi.org10.1021/acsami.6b09962 fiber alignment for generating complex multilayered tissues.
174. Yang H, Leow WR, Wang T, et al., 2017, 3D printed Advanced Healthcare Materials, 7(21): 1800894.
photoresponsive devices based on shape memory https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201800894
composites. Adv Mater, 29: 1701627.
180. Zhou X, Castro NJ, Zhu W, et al., 2016, Improved human
https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701627 bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell osteogenesis in
175. Gupta MK, Meng F, Johnson BN, et al., 2015, 3D printed 3D bioprinted tissue scaffolds with low intensity pulsed
programmable release capsules. Nano Lett, 15: 5321–5329. ultrasound stimulation. Sci Rep, 6: 32876.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b01688 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32876

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 257 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.638