Page 261 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of smart constructs for precise medicine

for drug delivery. Molecules, 25: 5649. 10786–10791.
https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25235649 87. Kaewchingduang R, Paradee N, Sirivat A, et al., 2019,
Effects of conductive polyazulene and plasticizer embedded
74. Shim JK, Lee YB, Lee YM, 1999, pH‐dependent permeation in deproteinized natural rubber transdermal patch on
through polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes prepared electrically controlled naproxen release-permeation. Int J
by ultraviolet polymerization technique. J Appl Polym Sci, Pharm, 561: 296–304.
74: 75–82.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.02.046
75. Mukhopadhyay P, Sarkar K, Bhattacharya S, et al., 2014, pH
sensitive N-succinyl chitosan grafted polyacrylamide hydrogel 88. Meng S, Rouabhia M, Zhang Z, 2013, Electrical stimulation
for oral insulin delivery. Carbohydr Polym, 112: 627–637. modulates osteoblast proliferation and bone protein
production through heparin‐bioactivated conductive
76. Xu Q, Huang W, Jiang L, et al., 2013, KGM and PMAA based scaffolds. Bioelectromagnetics, 34: 189–199.
pH-sensitive interpenetrating polymer network hydrogel for
controlled drug release. Carbohydr Polym, 97: 565–570. 89. Kim DH, Richardson‐Burns SM, Hendricks JL, et al., 2007,
Effect of immobilized nerve growth factor on conductive
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2013.05.007 polymers: Electrical properties and cellular response. Adv
77. Gupta P, Vermani K, Garg S, 2002, Hydrogels: from Func Mater, 17: 79–86.
controlled release to pH-responsive drug delivery. Drug 90. Wadhwa R, Lagenaur CF, Cui XT, 2006, Electrochemically
Discov Today, 7: 569–579. controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer
78. Ullah F, Othman MB, Javed F, et al., 2015, Classification, polypyrrole coated electrode. J Control Rel, 110: 531–541.
processing and application of hydrogels: A review. Mater Sci 91. Bao Z, Liu X, Liu Y, et al., 2016, Near-infrared light-
Eng C, 57: 414–433. responsive inorganic nanomaterials for photothermal
79. Akhlaghi SP, Zaman M, Mohammed N, et al., 2015, Synthesis therapy. Asian J Pharm Sci, 11: 349–364.
of amine functionalized cellulose nanocrystals: Optimization 92. Algorri J F, Ochoa M, Roldán-Varona P, et al., 2021, Light
and characterization. Carbohydr Res, 409: 48–55. technology for efficient and effective photodynamic therapy:
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carres.2015.03.009 . A critical review. Cancers (Basel), 13: 3484.
80. Bao G, Jiang T, Ravanbakhsh H, et al., 2020, Triggered https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13143484
micropore-forming bioprinting of porous viscoelastic 93. Alvarez‐Lorenzo C, Bromberg L, Concheiro A, 2009, Light‐
hydrogels. Mater Horizons, 7: 2336–2347. sensitive intelligent drug delivery systems. Photochem
https://doi.org/10.1039/D0MH00813C Photobiol, 85: 848–860.
81. Yi S, Liu Q, Luo Z, et al., 2022, Micropore-forming gelatin 94. Mantha S, Pillai S, Khayambashi P, et al., 2019, Smart
methacryloyl (GelMA) bioink toolbox 2.0: Designable hydrogels in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.
tunability and adaptability for 3D bioprinting applications. Materials (Basel), 12: 3323.
Small, 18: 2106357. 95. Rapp TL, DeForest CA, 2020, Visible light‐responsive
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202106357 dynamic biomaterials: Going deeper and triggering more.
Adv Healthc Mater, 9: 1901553.
82. Gelmi A, Schutt CE, 2021, Stimuli‐responsive biomaterials:
Scaffolds for stem cell control. Adv Healthc Mater, 10: https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201901553
2001125. 96. Lee TT, García JR, Paez JI, et al., 2015, Light-triggered in

83. Higgins MJ, Wallace GG, Molino PJ, et al., 2015, Conducting vivo activation of adhesive peptides regulates cell adhesion,
Polymers: Their Route to Nanobionics Applications inflammation and vascularization of biomaterials. Nat
via Atomic Force Microscopy. New York: Nova Science Mater, 14: 352–360.
Publishers, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4157
84. Du L, Li T, Jin F, et al., 2020, Design of high conductive and 97. Aleksandrzak M, Kukulka W, Mijowska E, 2017, Graphitic
piezoelectric poly (3, 4-ethylenedioxythiophene)/chitosan carbon nitride/graphene oxide/reduced graphene oxide
nanofibers for enhancing cellular electrical stimulation. J nanocomposites for photoluminescence and photocatalysis.
Coll Interface Sci 559: 65–75. Appl Surface Sci, 398: 56–62.
85. Yi YT, Sun JY, Lu YW, et al., 2015, Programmable and 98. Du W, Jin Y, Lai S, et al., 2020, Multifunctional light-
on-demand drug release using electrical stimulation. responsive graphene-based polyurethane composites
Biomicrofluidics, 9: 022401. with shape memory, self-healing, and flame retardancy
properties. Composites Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 128: 105686.
86. Feng T, Ji W, Tang Q, et al., 2019, Low-fouling nanoporous
conductive polymer-coated microelectrode for in vivo 99. Qazi TH, Blatchley MR, Davidson MD, et al., 2022,
monitoring of dopamine in the rat brain. Anal Chem, 91: Programming hydrogels to probe spatiotemporal cell

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 253 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.638