Page 382 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Micro/nano-3D hemostats for rapid wound healing

15. Mao AS, Özkalea B, Shah NJ, et al., 2019, Programmable 31. Hsu C, Hutt E, Bloomfield DM, et al., 2021, Factor XI
microencapsulation for enhanced mesenchymal stem cell inhibition to uncouple thrombosis from hemostasis: JACC
persistence and immunomodulation. PNAS, 116: 15392–15397. review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol, 78: 625–631.
16. Jia X, Minami K, Uto K, et al., 2020, Adaptive liquid 32. Liu J, Solanki A, White MJ, et al., 2022, Therapeutic use of
interfacially assembled protein nanosheets for guiding α2-antiplasmin as an antifibrinolytic and hemostatic agent in
mesenchymal stem cell fate. Adv Mater, 32: e1905942. surgery and regenerative medicine. NPJ Regen Med, 7: 1–11.
17. Ma Y, Jiang L, Hu J, et al., 2020, Multifunctional 3D micro- 33. Neubauer K, Zieger B, 2021, Endothelial cells and
nanostructures fabricated through temporally shaped coagulation. Cell Tissue Res, 7: 1–8.
femtosecond laser processing for preventing thrombosis 34. Law LA, Graham DK, Di Paola J, 2018, GAS6/TAM pathway
and bacterial infection. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 12: signaling in hemostasis and thrombosis. Front Med, 5: 137.
17155–17166.
35. Weisel J, Litvinov R, 2019, Red blood cells: The forgotten
18. Mariano A, Lubrano C, Bruno U, et al., 2021, Advances in player in hemostasis and thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost, 17:
cell-conductive polymer biointerfaces and role of the plasma 271–282.
membrane. Chem Rev, 122: 4552–4580.
36. Rodrigues M, Kosaric N, Bonham CA, et al., 2019, Wound
19. Guo B, Dong R, Liang Y, et al., 2021, Haemostatic materials healing: A cellular perspective. Physiol Rev, 99: 665–706.
for wound healing applications. Nat Rev Chem, 5: 773–791.
37. Abdi MM, Razalli RL, Tahir PM, et al., 2019, Optimized
20. Sakurai Y, Hardy ET, Ahn B, et al., 2018, A microengineered fabrication of newly cholesterol biosensor based on
vascularized bleeding model that integrates the principal nanocellulose. Int J Biol Macromol, 126: 1213–1222.
components of hemostasis. Nat Commun, 9: 509.
38. Freedman BR, Uzun O, Luna NMM, et al., 2021, Degradable and
21. Wilgus TA, Roy S, McDaniel JC, 2013, Neutrophils and removable tough adhesive hydrogels. Adv Mater, 33: e2008553.
wound repair: Positive actions and negative reactions. Adv
Wound Care, 2: 379–388. 39. Feng Y, Luo X, Wu F, et al., 2022, Systematic studies on blood
coagulation mechanisms of halloysite nanotubes-coated
22. Davies LC, Jenkins SJ, Allen JE, et al., 2013, Tissue-resident
macrophages. Nat Immun, 14: 986–995. PET dressing as superior topical hemostatic agent. J Chem
Eng, 428: 132049.
23. Ansell DM, Izeta A, 2015, Pericytes in wound healing: 40. Long M, Zhang Y, Huang P, et al., 2018, Emerging nanoclay
Friend or foe? Exp Dermatol, 24: 833–834.
composite for effective hemostasis. Adv Funct Mater, 28:
24. Armulik A, Genové G, Betsholtz C, 2011, Pericytes: 1704452.
Developmental, physiological, and pathological perspectives, 41. Cui Y, Huang Z, Lei L, et al., 2021, Robust hemostatic
problems, and promises. Dev Cell, 21: 193–215.
bandages based on nanoclay electrospun membranes. Nat
25. Crisan M, Yap S, Casteilla L, et al., 2008, A perivascular Commun, 12: 5922.
origin for mesenchymal stem cells in multiple human 42. Zhang Y, Li C, Zhang W, et al., 2021, 3D-printed NIR-
organs. Cell Stem Cell, 3: 301–313.
responsive shape memory polyurethane/magnesium
26. Asahara T, Murohara T, Sullivan A, et al., 1997, Isolation scaffolds with tight-contact for robust bone regeneration.
of putative progenitor endothelial cells for angiogenesis. Bioact Mater, 16–218–231.
Science, 275: 964–966.
43. Liang Y, He J, Guo B, 2021, Functional hydrogels as wound
27. Ceradini DJ, Kulkarni AR, Callaghan MJ, et al., 2004, dressing to enhance wound healing. ACS Nano, 15: 12687–
Progenitor cell trafficking is regulated by hypoxic gradients 12722.
through HIF-1 induction of SDF-1. Nat Med, 10: 858–864.
44. Bhusal A, Dogan E, Nguyen HA, et al., 2021, Multi-material
28. Kosaraju R, Rennert RC, Maan ZN, et al., 2016, Adipose- digital light processing bioprinting of hydrogel-based
derived stem cell-seeded hydrogels increase endogenous microfluidic chips. Biofabrication, 14: 1–14.
progenitor cell recruitment and neovascularization in 45. Lei C, Xie Z, Wu K, et al., 2021, Controlled vertically aligned
wounds. Tissue Eng Part A, 22: 295–305.
structures in polymer composites: Natural inspiration,
29. Tepper OM, Capla JM, Galiano RD, et al., 2005, Adult structural processing, and functional application.
vasculogenesis occurs through in situ recruitment, Adv Mater, 33: e2103495.
proliferation, and tubulization of circulating bone marrow– 46. Chaudhuri O, Cooper-White J, Janmey PA, et al., 2020,
derived cells. Blood, 105: 1068–1077.
Effects of extracellular matrix viscoelasticity on cellular
30. Donati G, Rognoni E, Hiratsuka T, et al., 2017, Wounding behaviour. Nature, 584: 535–546.
induces dedifferentiation of epidermal Gata6+ cells and 47. McHugh KJ, Nguyen TD, Linehan AR, et al., 2017,
acquisition of stem cell properties. Nat Cell Biol, 19: Fabrication of fillable microparticles and other complex 3D
603–613.
microstructures. Science, 357: 1138–1142.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 374 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.648
V