Page 384 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Micro/nano-3D hemostats for rapid wound healing

78. Nasajpour A, Mandla S, Shree S, et al., 2017, Nanostructured 94. Chen Y, Shafiq M, Liu M, et al., 2020, Advanced fabrication
fibrous membranes with rose spike-like architecture. Nano for electrospun three-dimensional nanofiber aerogels and
Lett, 17:6235–6240. scaffolds. Bioact Mater, 5: 963–979.
79. Liang Y, Li Z, Huang Y, et al., 2021, Dual-dynamic-bond 95. Tafreshi OA, Mosanenzadeh SG, Karamikamkar S, et al.,
cross-linked antibacterial adhesive hydrogel sealants with 2022, A review on multifunctional aerogel fibers: Processing,
on-demand removability for post-wound-closure and fabrication, functionalization, and applications. Mater Today
infected wound healing. ACS Nano, 15: 7078–7093. Chem, 23: 100736.
80. Hu Y, Cao S, Chen J, et al., 2020, Biomimetic fabrication of 96. Zhang X, Li Y, He D, et al., 2021, An effective strategy for
icariin loaded nano hydroxyapatite reinforced bioactive porous preparing macroporous and self-healing bioactive hydrogels
scaffolds for bone regeneration. J Chem Eng, 394: 124895. for cell delivery and wound healing. J Chem Eng, 425:
130677.
81. Liverani L, Liguori A, Zezza P, et al., 2021, Nanocomposite
electrospun fibers of poly(ε-caprolactone)/bioactive glass 97. Wan Y, Han J, Cheng F, et al., 2020, Green preparation of
with shape memory properties. Bioact Mater, 11: 230–239. hierarchically structured hemostatic epoxy-amine sponge.
J Chem Eng, 397: 125445.
82. Adu-Berchie K, Mooney DJ, 2020, Biomaterials as local niches
for immunomodulation. Acc Chem Res, 53: 1749–1760. 98. Zhang K, Bai X, Yuan Z, et al., 2019, Layered nanofiber
sponge with an improved capacity for promoting blood
83. Li Y, Niu F, Zhao X, et al., 2021, Nonwetting nanostructured
hemostatic material for bleeding control with minimal coagulation and wound healing. Biomater, 204: 70–79.
adhesion. Adv Mater Interfaces, 8: 2101412. 99. Jiang J, Oguzlu H, Jiang F, 2021, 3D printing of lightweight,
super-strong yet flexible all-cellulose structure. J Chem Eng,
84. Yan Y, Yan J, Gong X, et al., 2021, All-in-one asymmetric micro-
supercapacitor with negative Poisson’s ratio structure based on 405: 126668.
versatile electrospun nanofibers. J Chem Eng, 133580. 100. Hu Y, Wu B, Xiong Y, et al., 2021, Cryogenic 3D printed
hydrogel scaffolds loading exosomes accelerate diabetic
85. Guo Y, Huang J, Fang Y, et al., 2022, 1D, 2D, and 3D scaffolds
promoting angiogenesis for enhanced wound healing. wound healing. J Chem Eng, 426: 130634.
J Chem Eng, 437: 134690. 101. Zhang H, Cong Y, Osi AR, et al., 2020, Direct 3D printed
biomimetic scaffolds based on hydrogel microparticles
86. Yang G, Kong H, Chen Y, et al., 2022, Recent advances in
the hybridization of cellulose and carbon nanomaterials: for cell spheroid growth. Adv Funct Mater, 30:
Interactions, structural design, functional tailoring, and 1910573.
applications. Carbohydr Polym, 279: 118947. 102. Zou F, Wang Y, Zheng Y, et al., 2022, A novel bioactive
polyurethane with controlled degradation and L-Arg release
87. Wang L, Zhou M, Xu T, et al., 2022, Multifunctional hydrogel
as wound dressing for intelligent wound monitoring. used as strong adhesive tissue patch for hemostasis and
J Chem Eng, 433: 134625. promoting wound healing. Bioact Mater, 17: 471–487.
103. Biranje SS, Sun J, Cheng L, et al., 2022, Development of
88. Yang H, Liang Y, Wang J, et al., 2021, Multifunctional
wound dressing for rapid hemostasis, bacterial infection cellulose nanofibril/casein-based 3D composite hemostasis
scaffold
application.
wound-healing
for
potential
monitoring and photodynamic antibacterial therapy. Acta ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 14: 3792–3808.
Biomater, 135: 179–190.
104. Pourchet LJ, Thepot A, Albouy M, et al., 2017, Human
89. Khodaei A, Jahanmard F, Madaah Hosseini HR, et al.,
2021, Controlled temperature-mediated curcumin release skin 3D bioprinting using scaffold-free approach.
from magneto-thermal nanocarriers to kill bone tumors. Adv Healthc Mater, 6: 1–8.
Bioact Mater, 11: 107–117. 105. Taghizadeh M, Taghizadeh A, Yazdi MK, et al., 2022,
90. Zheng L, Wang Q, Zhang YS, et al., 2021, A hemostatic Chitosan-based inks for 3D printing and bioprinting. Green
sponge derived from skin secretion of Andrias davidianus Chem, 24: 62–101.
and nanocellulose. J Chem Eng, 416: 129136. 106. Lavrador P, Esteves MR, Gaspar VM, et al., 2020, Stimuli‐
responsive nanocomposite hydrogels for biomedical
91. Li Y, Zhu J, Cheng H, et al., 2021, Developments of advanced applications. Adv Funct Mater, 31: 2005941.
electrospinning techniques: A critical review. Adv Mater
Technol, 6: 2100410. 107. Yuan H, Chen L, Hong FF, 2020, A biodegradable
antibacterial nanocomposite based on oxidized bacterial
92. Zheng Y, Ma W, Yang Z, et al., 2022, An ultralong
hydroxyapatite nanowire aerogel for rapid hemostasis and nanocellulose for rapid hemostasis and wound healing. ACS
wound healing. J Chem Eng, 430: 132912. Appl Mater Interfaces, 12: 3382–3392.
108. Placone JK, Engler AJ, 2018, Recent advances in extrusion-
93. Zhang X, Lei Y, Li C, et al., 2021, Superhydrophobic and
multifunctional aerogel enabled by bioinspired salvinia leaf‐ based 3d printing for biomedical applications. Adv Healthc
like structure. Adv Funct Mater, 32: 2110830. Mater, 7: e1701161.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)olume 9 Issue 1 (2023)
V 376 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.648