Page 40 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion

Ethics approval and consent to participate devices. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 10: 17489–17507.

Not applicable. 12. Falahati M, Ahmadvand P, Safaee S, et al., 2020, Smart
polymers and nanocomposites for 3D and 4D printing.
Consent for publication Mater Today, 40: 215–245.
Not applicable. 13. Bekas D, Hou Y, Liu Y, et al., 2019, 3D printing to enable
multifunctionality in polymer-based composites: A review.
Availability of data Compos B Eng, 179:107540.
14. Sagias V, Giannakopoulos KI, Stergiou CI, 2018, Mechanical
All data are presented in the manuscript and the properties of 3D printed polymer specimens. Proc Struct
Supplementary File. Integr, 10: 85–90.

References 15. Ahangar P, Cooke ME, Weber MH, et al., 2019, Current
biomedical applications of 3D printing and additive
1. Shahrubudin N, Lee TC, Ramlan R, 2019, An overview manufacturing. Appl Sci, 9: 1713.
on 3D printing technology: Technological, materials, and
applications. Proc Manuf, 35: 1286–1296. 16. Fan D, Li Y, Wang X, et al., 2020, Progressive 3D printing
technology and its application in medical materials. Front
2. Buchanan C, Gardner L, 2019, Metal 3D printing in Pharmacol, 11: 122.
construction: A review of methods, research, applications,
opportunities and challenges. Eng Struct, 180: 332–348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00122
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.11.045 17. Ahmed S, Chauhan VM, Ghaemmaghami AM, et al., 2019,
New generation of bioreactors that advance extracellular
3. Chen Z, Li Z, Li J, et al., 2019, 3D printing of ceramics: matrix modelling and tissue engineering. Biotechnol Lett,
A review. J Eur Ceram Soc, 39: 661–687. 41: 1–25.
4. Sikder P, Ferreira JA, Fakhrabadi EA, et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-018-2611-7
Bhaduri, bioactive amorphous magnesium phosphate-
polyetheretherketone composite filaments for 3D printing. 18. Pantazis AK, Papadakis G, Parasyris K, et al., 2020,
Dent Mater, 36: 865–883. 3D-printed bioreactors for dna amplification: Application to
companion diagnostics. Sens Actuators B Chem, 319: 128161.
5. Daminabo SC, Goel S, Grammatikos SA, et al., 2020, thakur,
fused deposition modeling-based additive manufacturing https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2020.128161
(3D printing): Techniques for polymer material systems. 19. Ferraz MA, Henning HH, Da Costa PF, et al., 2018, Potential
Mater Today Chem, 16: 100248. health and environmental risks of three-dimensional
6. Singh B, Kumar R, Chohan JS, 2020, Polymer matrix engineered polymers. Environ Sci Technol Lett, 5: 80–85.
composites in 3D printing: A state of art review. Mater https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00495
Today, 33: 1562–1567.
20. Inoue Y, Ikuta K, 2013, Detoxification of the photocurable
7. Ligon SC, Liska R, Stampfl J, et al., 2017, Polymers for 3D polymer by heat treatment for microstereolithography. Proc
printing and customized additive manufacturing. Chem CIRP, 5: 115–118.
Rev, 117: 10212–10290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2013.01.023
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
21. Campanale C, Massarelli C, Savino I, et al., 2020, A detailed
8. Stansbury JW, Idacavage MJ, 2016, 3D printing with review study on potential effects of microplastics and
polymers: Challenges among expanding options and additives of concern on human health. Int J Environ Res
opportunities. Dent Mater, 32: 54–64. Public Health, 17: 1212.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.09.018 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041212
9. Wang X, Jiang M, Zhou Z, et al., 2017, 3D printing of 22. Ojeda T, 2013, Polymers and the environment. Polym Sci,
polymer matrix composites: A review and prospective. 23: 23.
Compos Part B Eng, 110: 442–458.
https://doi.org/10.5772/51057
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.034
23. Priyadarshini BM, Dikshit V, Zhang Y, 2020, 3D-printed
10. Ortiz-Acosta D, Moore T, 2018, Functional 3D printed bioreactors for in vitro modeling and analysis. Int J Bioprint,
polymeric materials. In: Functional materials. 9: 1-5. 6: 267.
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.80686 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v6i4.267
11. Nadgorny M, Ameli A, 2018, functional polymers and 24. Zhang Y, 2017, post-printing surface modification and
nanocomposites for 3D printing of smart structures and functionalization of 3D-printed biomedical device. Int J

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 32 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.623