Page 41 - IJB-9-1

International Journal of Bioprinting Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion

Bioprint, 3: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244161
https://doi.org/10.18063/IJB.2017.02.001 36. Calignano F, Galati M, Iuliano L, et al., 2019, design
of additively manufactured structures for biomedical
25. Popov VK, Evseev AV, Ivanov A, et al., 2004, Laser
stereolithography and supercritical fluid processing for applications: A review of the additive manufacturing processes
custom-designed implant fabrication. J Mater Sci Mater applied to the biomedical sector. J Healthc Eng, 2019: 9748212.
Med, 15: 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9748212
https://doi.org/10.1023/b: jmsm.0000011812.08185.2a 37. Rahim TN, Abdullah AM, Akil HM, et al., 2016, Comparison
of mechanical properties for polyamide 12 composite-based
26. D’Urso PS, Effeney DJ, Earwaker WJ, et al., 2000, Custom
cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast biomaterials fabricated by fused filament fabrication and
Surg, 53: 200–204. injection molding. AIP Conf Proc, 1791: 020007
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4968862
https://doi.org/10.1054/bjps.1999.3268
38. Feng L, Wang Y, Wei Q, 2019, PA12 powder recycled from
27. Putame G, Gabetti S, Carbonaro D, et al., 2020, Compact
and tunable stretch bioreactor advancing tissue engineering SLS for FDM. Polymers, 11: 727.
implementation. application to engineered cardiac https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11040727
constructs. Med Eng Phys, 84: 1–9.
39. Kinstlinger IS, Bastian A, Paulsen SJ, et al., 2016, Open-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2020.07.018 source selective laser sintering (OpenSLS) of nylon and
biocompatible polycaprolactone. PLoS One, 11: e0147399
28. Rimington RP, Capel AJ, Chaplin KF, et al., 2019,
Differentiation of bioengineered skeletal muscle within https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147399
a 3D printed perfusion bioreactor reduces atrophic and 40. Shi Y, Pan T, Zhu W, et al., 2020, Artificial bone scaffolds of
inflammatory gene expression. ACS Biomater Sci Eng, 5: coral imitation prepared by selective laser sintering. J Mech
5525–5538.
Behav Biomed Mater, 104: 103664.
29. Banik BL, Brown JL, 2020, 3D-printed bioreactor enhances https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103664
potential for tendon tissue engineering. Regen Eng Transl
Med, 6: 1–10. 41. Gan X, Wang J, Wang Z, et al., 2019, Simultaneous realization
of conductive segregation network microstructure and
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40883-019-00145-y
minimal surface porous macrostructure by SLS 3D printing.
30. Smith LJ, Li P, Holland MR, et al., 2018, FABRICA: Mater Des, 178: 107874.
A bioreactor platform for printing, perfusing, observing, 42. Hussain G, Khan WA, Ashraf HA, et al., 2019, Design
and stimulating 3D tissues. Sci Rep, 8: 1–10.
and development of a lightweight SLS 3D printer with a
31. Achinas S, Euverink GJ, 2019, Development Of An controlled heating mechanism: Part A. Int J Lightweight
Anaerobic Digestion Screening System Using 3D-Printed Mater Manuf, 2: 373–378.
Mini-Bioreactors. In: New Adv Ferment Processes. London: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlmm.2019.01.005
Intechopen.
43. Cai C, Tey WS, Chen J, et al., 2021, Comparative study on
32. Xia C, Fang NX, 2009, 3D microfabricated bioreactor with 3D printing of polyamide 12 by selective laser sintering and
capillaries. Biomed Microdev, 11: 1309–1315.
multi jet fusion. J Mater Process Technol, 288: 116882.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10544-009-9350-4
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2020.116882
33. Zhou LY, Fu J, He Y, 2020, A review of 3D printing 44. Chin SY, Dikshit V, Priyadarshini BM, et al., 2020, Powder-
technologies for soft polymer materials. Adv Funct Mater, based 3D printing for the fabrication of device with micro
30: 2000187.
and mesoscale features. Micromachines (Basel), 11: 658.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202000187
https://doi.org/10.3390/mi11070658
34. Tamay DG, Usal TD, Alagoz AS, et al., 2019, 3D and 4D 45. Dikshit V, Goh GD, Nagalingam AP, et al., 2020, Recent
printing of polymers for tissue engineering applications. progress in 3D printing of fiber-reinforced composite and
Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 7: 164–164.
nanocomposites. In: Han B, Sharma S, Nguyen TA, editors.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00164 Fiber-Reinforced Nanocomposites: Fundamentals and
Applications. Ch. 17. Amsterdam: Elsevier, p371-p394.
35. Tagliaferri V, Trovalusci F, Guarino S, et al., 2019,
Environmental and economic analysis of fdm, sls and mjf 46. Yuan S, Shen F, Chua CK, et al., 2019, Polymeric composites
additive manufacturing technologies. Materials (Basel), 12: for powder-based additive manufacturing: Materials and
4161. applications. Prog Polym Sci, 91: 141–168.

Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023) 33 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.623