Page 37 - IJB-9-1
P. 37

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Biocompatible materials and Multi Jet Fusion


            protein binding capability using BSA-FITC. Earlier studies   Both fibroblast and osteoblast cells show the ability to
            demonstrate the use of low-pressure O  plasma to activate   grow in the leachate medium (Figure 2A and Figure S2).
                                           2
            porous surfaces for significantly increasing the utility   Fibroblasts grow well regardless of whether it is cultivated
            value  of  3D-printed  products  by  improving  previously   in the leachate or the normal medium. However,
            inaccessible poor surface properties of the products .   osteoblasts grown in the leachate demonstrate a drop in the
                                                        [64]
            The  protein  adsorption  experiments  using  BSA-FITC   MTT values at day 4 compared to those grown in αMEM,
            indicated successful dose-dependent protein capture that   suggesting that they proliferate better in the normal
            plateaus, suggesting saturation, at around 1%, indicating   medium in comparison to the leachate (Figure 2B and 2C).
            a possibility that the surfaces of 3D-printed materials can   Although it is statistically different, the difference is small.
            simulate the  properties  of natural extracellular  matrix   As aforementioned, the leachate medium is prepared by
            aiming to regulate the behavior of cell adhesion (Table 1).   soaking PA-12 cell culture chambers in the respective cell
            This may also suggest that the spatial conformation of the   culture media. Small molecules that leach into the medium,
            adsorbed biomolecules plays a key factor in mediating   possibly from fusing and detailing agents, may have caused
            cell adhesion rather than the concentration or amount of   this effect, as indicated in Table 1. Therefore, the growth
            molecules affecting the adhesion process . However, there   of a certain cell type is slower in leachate compared to the
                                            [65]
            is no significant difference between O  plasma-treated and   control. Otherwise, no other potential material leaching
                                          2
            untreated cell culture chambers (Figure 1G and H). In this   issue is observed in our experiments as the typical test only
            case, however, O  plasma-treatment does not enhance   uses leachate medium exposed to MJF-printed PA-12 for
                          2
            the protein binding capability of MJF-printed PA12 .   5 days. Further, investigations are underway to unravel
                                                        [61]
            Based on this observation, 3D-printed PA-12 are directly   the effect of material leaching with regards to cell growth.
            functionalized  with  biopolymers  such  as  PDL  and  CLG   However, further studies are required to probe into cell
            (at 50 µg/mL), commonly used biomolecules that help in   line specific  in  vitro toxicity and cytocompatibility of
            initiating cell attachment and maintaining cell growth.  3D-printed PA-12.
              The primary focus of this work is to evaluate the   As shown in MTT studies from direct culture in
            biocompatibility of 3D-printed PA-12 cell culture chambers.   3D-printed PA-12 cell culture chambers, L929 fibroblasts
            The choice of assays plays a key role in assessing the material   adapt well and proliferate efficiently when cultured in the
            cytotoxicity, while other parameters, such as controls, cell   3D-printed PA-12 (Figure 3B and 7B) cell culture chambers,
            lines, period of culture, and other biochemical events are   whereas osteoblasts did grow and proliferate, but to a lesser
            crucial in testing a material’s compatibility . Here, we study   degree (Figure 3C and  7C). The observed reduction in
                                            [66]
            the biocompatibility of 3D-printed PA-12 by 2 methods: (i)   proliferation of osteoblasts could be related to the fact that
            by indirectly exposing the cells to the leachate medium that   MTT activity is directly proportional to the cell number .
                                                                                                           [67]
            is extracted by exposing the culture medium to 3D-printed   Moreover, osteoblasts appear larger in size compared to
            PA-12 parts and (ii) by directly seeding the cells on the   fibroblasts, as shown in  Figure 3A  and  Figures S3–S10.
            surface of the material (short- and long-term culture). This   Many osteoblast cells (Figure 4B) are suspended between
            study, which employs multiple cell lines, including L929   two particles, whereas fibroblasts fully attach on one
            fibroblasts and MC3T3e1 osteoblasts grown on surface-  particle. SEM images after 4 days of culture show that the
            coated 3D-printed PA-12, shows a significant difference in   L929 cells are more or less rounded in shape, orientate
            their sensitivity toward the cell culture chambers.  symmetrically with small cellular extensions aiding in
            Table 1. A summary of key MJF‑printed PA‑12 features of interest, their associated problems, and our results addressing them in
            this study
             Printed substrate’s features  Potential problems         Results
            PA-12’s binding affinity for protein   •  Ease of surface functionalization with   •  Printed PA‑12 can bind to BSA, indicating surface
            biomolecules                 extracellular matrix         modification with protein extracellular matrix is possible
            Surface topography/roughness  • Impaired cell adhesion   •  Cells can adhere to printed PA‑12 from passage to passage
                                        • Abnormal cell morphology   •  While fluorescence microscopy does not indicate an obvious
                                                                      change in cell morphology, SEM shows fibroblast displaying
                                                                      unusual morphology
            Fusing and detailing agents  • Cytotoxicity              • No cytotoxicity is detected
                                        • Growth inhibition          •  Cells can proliferate, though not as good as on polystyrene
                                        • Differentiation inhibition  surface
                                                                     • Osteoblast can differentiate



            Volume 9 Issue 1 (2023)                         29                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i1.623
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42