Page 400 - IJB-9-2
P. 400

International Journal of Bioprinting                               In situ 3D bioprinter for skin wound healing


            perspective variant of 3D bioprinting technology and the   roadmap. Biofabrication, 12: 022002.
            further development and successful clinical applications of      https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5158
            commercial in situ bioprinters are highly desirable .
                                                    [36]
                                                               3.   Murphy SV, De Coppi P, Atala A, 2020, Opportunities and
            Acknowledgments                                       challenges of translational 3D bioprinting. Nat Biomed Eng,
                                                                  4: 370–380.
            None.
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0471-7
            Funding                                            4.   Ozbolat IT, 2015, Bioprinting scale-up tissue and organ
                                                                  constructs  for  transplantation.  Trends  Biotechnol,
            This work  was funded by the Ministry of Science  and   33: 395–400.
            Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the
            strategic academic leadership program “Priority 2030.”     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.04.005
                                                               5.   Mironov V, Kasyanov V, Drake C,  et  al., 2008, Organ
            Conflict of interest                                  printing: Promises and challenges. Regen Med, 3: 93–103.
            The authors declare no conflicts of interest.         https://doi.org/10.2217/17460751.3.1.93

            Author contributions                               6.   He J, Mao M, Li X, et al., 2021, Bioprinting of 3D functional
                                                                  tissue constructs. Int J Bioprint, 7: 395.
            Conceptualization: Vladimir A. Mironov and Vadim L.      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v7i3.395
               Zorin
            Formal analysis: Sergey P. Domogatsky and Vladislav A.   7.   Mironov V, Boland T, Trusk T, et al., 2003, Organ printing:
               Parfenov                                           Computer-aided jet-based 3D tissue engineering.  Trends
            Funding acquisition: Yusef D. Khesuani                Biotechnol, 1: 157–161.
            Investigation: Pavel A. Karalkin, Elizaveta V. Koudan, and      https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7799(03)00033-7
               Egor O. Osidak                                  8.   Zhang J, Wehrle E, Rubert M, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting of
            Methodology: Alexey V. Kovalev and Vladimir A. Kasyanov  human tissues: Biofabrication, bioinks, and bioreactors. Int J
            Resources: Fedor S. Senatov                           Mol Sci, 22: 3971.
            Software: Aleksandr A. Levin                          https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22083971
            Visualization: Frederico D.A.S. Pereira
            Writing – original draft: Vladislav A. Lvov and Stanislav V.   9.   Yeong WY, Chua CK, Leong KF,  et  al., 2004, Rapid
               Petrov                                             prototyping in tissue engineering: Challenges and potential.
            Writing – review and editing: Natalya E. Manturova and   Trends Biotechnol, 22: 643–652.
               Natalia S. Sergeeva                                https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.10.004
                                                               10.  Ng WL, Chua CK, Shen YF, 2019, Print me an organ! Why
            Ethics approval and consent to participate            we are not there yet. Prog Polym Sci, 97: 101145.
            Experiments on animals have been approved Ethical      https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.101145
            Committee of The National Medical Research Radiological   11.  Weng T, Zhang W, Xia Y, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for skin
            Center, P. A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Center,   tissue engineering: Current status and perspectives. J Tissue
            Moscow, Russia, by the local ethics committee (protocol   Eng, 12: 20417314211028574.
            #0120/19 dated November 1, 2019).
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1177/20417314211028574
            Consent for publication                            12.  Gao C, Lu C, Jian Z,  et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting for
            Not applicable.                                       fabricating artificial skin tissue. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces,
                                                                  208: 112041.
            Availability of data                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112041

            Not applicable.                                    13.  Martin I, Wendt D, Heberer M, 2004, The role of bioreactors
                                                                  in tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 22: 80–6.
            References
                                                                  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2003.12.001
            1.   Murphy SV, Atala A, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and   14.  Hansmann J, Groeber F, Kahlig A, et al., 2013, Bioreactors in
               organs. Nat Biotechnol, 32: 773–785.
                                                                  tissue engineering-principles, applications and commercial
               https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2958                   constraints. Biotechnol J, 8: 298–307.
            2.   Sun W, Starly B, Daly AC,  et al., 2020, The bioprinting      https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201200162


            Volume 9 Issue 2 (2023)                        392                      https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v9i2.675
   395   396   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405