Page 180 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Flow performance of porous implants with different geometry

27. Ali D, Sen S, 2018, Permeability and fluid flow-induced wall stacks of commercial biomaterials usable for bone grafting.
shear stress of bone tissue scaffolds: Computational fluid Micron, 133:102861.
dynamic analysis using Newtonian and non-Newtonian
blood flow models. Comput Biol Med, 99:201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micron.2020.102861
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2018.06.017 36. Ouyang P, Dong H, He X, et al., 2019, Hydromechanical
mechanism behind the effect of pore size of porous titanium
28. Zhao F, Melke J, Ito K, et al., 2019, A multiscale scaffolds on osteoblast response and bone ingrowth. Mater
computational fluid dynamics approach to simulate the Design, 183:108151.
micro-fluidic environment within a tissue engineering
scaffold with highly irregular pore geometry. Biomech Model https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108151
Mechanobiol, 18:1965–1977. 37. Singh SP, Shukla M, Srivastava RK, 2018, Lattice modeling
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01188-4 and CFD simulation for prediction of permeability in porous
scaffolds. Mater Today Proc, 5:18879–18886.
29. Poon C, 2022, Measuring the density and viscosity of culture
media for optimized computational fluid dynamics analysis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2018.06.236
of in vitro devices. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 126:105024.
38. Du Y, Liang H, Xie D, et al., 2019, Finite element analysis
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105024 of mechanical behavior, permeability of irregular porous
30. Baroud G, Falk R, Crookshank M, et al., 2004, Experimental scaffolds and lattice-based porous scaffolds. Mater Res
and theoretical investigation of directional permeability of Express, 6:105407.
human vertebral cancellous bone for cement infiltration. J https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab3ac1
Biomech, 37:189–196.
39. Yu G, Li Z, Li S, et al., 2020, The select of internal architecture
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(03)00246-X for porous Ti alloy scaffold: A compromise between
31. Nauman EA, Fong KE, Keaveny TM, 1999, Dependence of mechanical properties and permeability. Mater Design,
intertrabecular permeability on flow direction and anatomic 192:108754.
site. Ann Biomed Eng, 27:517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2020.108754
https://doi.org/10.1114/1.195 40. Timercan A, Sheremetyev V, Brailovski V, 2021, Mechanical
32. Kohles SS, Roberts JB, Upton ML, et al., 2001, Direct properties and fluid permeability of gyroid and diamond
perfusion measurements of cancellous bone anisotropic lattice structures for intervertebral devices: Functional
permeability. J Biomech, 34:1197–1202. requirements and comparative analysis. Sci Technol Adv
Mater, 22:285–300.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00082-3
https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1907222
33. Sander EA, Shimko DA, Dee KC, et al., 2003, Examination
of continuum and micro-structural properties of human 41. Foroughi AH, Razavi MJ, 2022, Multi-objective shape
vertebral cancellous bone using combined cellular solid optimization of bone scaffolds: Enhancement of
models. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 2:97–107. mechanical properties and permeability. Acta Biomater,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-003-0031-6 146:317–340.
34. Syahrom A, Abdul Kadir MR, Abdullah J, et al., 2013, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2022.04.051
Permeability studies of artificial and natural cancellous bone 42. Foroughi AH, Razavi MJ, 2022, Shape optimization of
structures. Med Eng Phys, 35:792–799. orthopedic porous scaffolds to enhance mechanical
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.011 performance. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 128:105098.
35. Chappard D, Kün-Darbois J-D, Guillaume B, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105098
Computational fluid dynamics simulation from microCT

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 172 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.700