Page 179 - IJB-9-3

International Journal of Bioprinting Flow performance of porous implants with different geometry

6. Školáková A, Körberová J, Málek J, et al., 2020, 16. Castro APG, Lacroix D, 2018, Micromechanical study of the
Microstructural, mechanical, corrosion and cytotoxicity load transfer in a polycaprolactone–collagen hybrid scaffold
characterization of porous Ti-Si alloys with pore-forming when subjected to unconfined and confined compression.
agent. Materials, 13:5607. Biomech Model Mechanobiol, 17:531–541.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13245607 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-017-0976-5
7. Szklanny AA, Debbi L, Merdler U, et al., 2020, High‐ 17. Castro APG, Pires T, Santos JE, et al., 2019, Permeability
throughput scaffold system for studying the effect of local versus design in TPMS scaffolds. Materials, 12:1313.
geometry and topology on the development and orientation https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12081313
of sprouting blood vessels. Adv Funct Mater, 30:1901335.
18. Zhao S, Hou WT, Xu QS, et al., 2018, Ti-6Al-4V lattice
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201901335
structures fabricated by electron beam melting for
8. Rodríguez-Montaño ÓL, Cortés-Rodríguez CJ, Uva biomedical applications. In Titanium in Medical and Dental
AE, et al., 2018, Comparison of the mechanobiological Applications, Elsevier, 277–301.
performance of bone tissue scaffolds based on different unit https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-812456-7.00013-5
cell geometries. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 83:28–45.
19. Li J, Chen D, Luan H, et al., 2017, Mechanical performance
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.04.008
of porous implant with different unit cells. J Mech Med Biol,
9. Castro APG, Santos J, Pires T, et al., 2020, Micromechanical 17:1750101.
behavior of TPMS scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219519417501019
Macromol Mater Eng, 305:2000487.
20. Ma S, Song K, Lan J, et al., 2020, Biological and mechanical
https://doi.org/10.1002/mame.202000487
property analysis for designed heterogeneous porous
10. Bružauskaitė I, Bironaitė D, Bagdonas E, et al., 2016, scaffolds based on the refined TPMS. J Mech Behav Biomed
Scaffolds and cells for tissue regeneration: Different scaffold Mater, 107:103727.
pore sizes—Different cell effects. Cytotechnology, 68: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103727
355–369.
21. Shi J, Zhu L, Li L, et al., 2018, A TPMS-based method
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-015-9895-4
for modeling porous scaffolds for bionic bone tissue
11. Zhao F, Vaughan TJ, McNamara LM, 2016, Quantification engineering. Sci Rep, 8:7395.
of fluid shear stress in bone tissue engineering scaffolds with https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25750-9
spherical and cubical pore architectures. Biomech Model
Mechanobiol, 15:561–577. 22. Santos J, Pires T, Gouveia BP, et al., 2020, On the permeability
of TPMS scaffolds. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 110:103932.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-015-0710-0
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103932
12. Ali D, Ozalp M, Blanquer SBG, et al., 2020, Permeability and
fluid flow-induced wall shear stress in bone scaffolds with 23. Ahmadi SM, Hedayati R, Li Y, et al., 2018, Fatigue
TPMS and lattice architectures: A CFD analysis. Eur J Mech performance of additively manufactured meta-biomaterials:
B Fluids, 79:376–385. The effects of topology and material type. Acta Biomater,
65:292–304.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.09.015
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.014
13. Zhao F, Rietbergen B, Ito K, et al., 2020, Fluid flow‐induced
cell stimulation in bone tissue engineering changes due 24. Wu J, Sigmund O, Groen JP, 2021, Topology optimization
to interstitial tissue formation in vitro. Int J Numer Meth of multi-scale structures: A review. Struct Multidisc Optim,
Biomed Engng, 36:e3342. 63:1455–1480.
https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3342 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-021-02881-8
14. Zhao F, Lacroix D, Ito K, et al., 2020, Changes in scaffold 25. Ali D, Sen S, 2018, Computational fluid dynamics study of
porosity during bone tissue engineering in perfusion the effects of surface roughness on permeability and fluid
bioreactors considerably affect cellular mechanical flow-induced wall shear stress in scaffolds. Ann Biomed Eng,
stimulation for mineralization. Bone Rep, 12:100265. 46:2023–2035.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2020.100265 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-018-2101-z
15. Cartmell SH, Porter BD, García AJ, et al., 2003, Effects of 26. Pires T, Santos J, Ruben RB, et al., 2021, Numerical-
medium perfusion rate on cell-seeded three-dimensional experimental analysis of the permeability-porosity
bone constructs in vitro. Tissue Eng, 9:1197–1203. relationship in triply periodic minimal surfaces scaffolds. J
Biomech, 117:110263.
https://doi.org/10.1089/10763270360728107
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110263

Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023) 171 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.700