Page 270 - IJB-9-3
P. 270

International Journal of Bioprinting                            Performance of Bredigite-based bone scaffolds






































            Figure 5. Stress–strain curves for different scaffold models (50% porosity). The red curve represents the open-rod model support, and the black curve
            represents the TPMS model support.

            2.4.2. Cell adhesion experiment of scaffolds       in a new 48-well plate. The CCK-8 solution and complete
            MC3T3-E1 cells were co-cultured with two model scaffolds   medium were mixed at a ratio of 1:9; then, 250 μL of the
            having 60% porosity. Before co-culture, the scaffold was   mixed solution was added into each well and placed in
            sterilized at a high temperature and then baked at 60°C for   the incubator for culture. The absorbance at 450 nm was
            24 h. After baking was performed, the samples were placed   measured by using a multifunctional microplate reader.
            in a 48-well culture plate and soaked in PBS for 1 h. Then,   The optical density (OD) values of the samples to be tested
            500 μL of a cell suspension (2 × 10  cells/mL) was added   and of the blank control group at 450 nm were measured
                                         4
            to the material surface. The suspension was added five   by using an enzyme reader. The final OD value was
            times throughout the time the samples were cultured in an   determined  by  subtracting  the  measured  value  of  blank
            incubator. The culture medium was changed every other day.  control group from the measured value of the sample to
                                                               be tested. Three parallel measurements were obtained for
               After 48 h of scaffold and cell culture, one TPMS model
            scaffold and one open-rod model scaffold were removed.   each sample.
            The cells were washed three times with PBS, fixed with a   3. Results and discussion
            2.5 vol.% glutaraldehyde solution for more than 1 h, and
            then dehydrated in a gradient of alcohol (the gradient of   3.1. Pressure test
            alcohol used in this experiment: 30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 95, and   3.1.1. Analysis of the mechanical properties
            100%). After the sample was dried, the cells were observed   Figure 5 shows the stress–strain diagram of the two model
            by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the   scaffolds with 50% porosity. The stress–strain curve for
            pre-sample was observed for gold spraying.         compact scaffolds is long, smooth, and ascending, whereas
                                                               the curve for porous scaffolds begins with a “canine” line
            2.4.3. Cell proliferation assay of scaffolds       and then rises smoothly until it reaches its maximum.
            A CCK-8 cell proliferation detection kit was used to   When the pressure increases gradually, the compressive
            evaluate the effect of the bredigite bone tissue-engineered   strength of the porous ceramics decreases sharply. When
            scaffold on the proliferation of osteoblast cells.  the pressure reaches its maximum, the first layer of the
               The cells and scaffolds were cultured for 1, 4, and 7 days,   porous scaffold bends and collapses beyond its compressive
            and the samples in the well plate were removed and placed   limit. The crushed powder then fills the first layer of holes


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        262                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.708
   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275