Page 271 - IJB-9-3
P. 271

International Journal of Bioprinting                            Performance of Bredigite-based bone scaffolds























            Figure 6. Mechanical properties of two scaffolds at different porosities. Green represents the open-rod model support, and orange represents the TPMS
            model support. (a) Ultimate tensile strength. (b) Strain when the support collapses and breaks.

            and  becomes  progressively  denser  under  pressure. As   of the TPMS model with 70% porosity is approximately
            the strain increases, the stress gradually increases until it   10 Mpa higher than that of the open-rod model with 50%
            exceeds that of the first dense layer, causing the hole wall to   porosity, indicating that the strength of the TPMS model
            bend and collapse. The corresponding powder further fills   can be improved by optimizing the single-cell structure
            the holes in the second layer, and the process is repeated   and arrangement of the scaffold, and the TPMS model
            until the entire ceramic collapses.                bracket has a higher strength than the commonly used
                                                               open-rod model. The strain values of the 50, 60, and 70%
            3.1.2. Compressive strength                        open-rod models are 2.89 ± 0.39, 2.85 ± 0.41, and 2.79 ±
            Figure 6a shows the ultimate compressive strengths of   0.53, respectively. All of them are smaller than the TPMS
            the two  supports, and  Figure  6b shows the strain when   model scaffolds, indicating that the TPMS structure has
            collapse occurs. The ultimate compressive strengths of   good ductility. Taken together, the mechanical strength of
            the TPMS models with 50, 60, and 70% porosity were   the TPMS model is higher than that of the open-rod model
            65.45 ± 2.45 Mpa, 59.16 ± 5.15 Mpa, and 55.09 ± 3.9 Mpa,   and satisfied the requirements for clinical use in repairing
            respectively. With an increase in porosity, the ultimate   bone defects.
            compressive strength of the scaffold decreased significantly.
            Generally, the compressive strength of cancellous bone   3.2. Analysis of mechanical properties of scaffolds
            is 1–10 Mpa, and that of dense bone is 1–100 Mpa.   during degradation
            However, in the clinical treatment of bone defects, it is   Figure 7 shows the compressive strength and its variation
            not clear whether cancellous-like scaffolds will be filled at   with the degradation time. With the extension of the
            the site of cancellous bone, while the site of dense bone   degradation time, the compressive strength of the bredigite
            will be filled with scaffolds similar to dense bone. This   scaffold  gradually decreases;  however,  this overall  trend
            necessitates the bone tissue-engineered scaffolds with a   gradually slows down. The  TPMS scaffolds with  50%
            high  porosity  to  achieve  the  compressive  strength,  and   porosity show the slowest decline in mechanical strength.
            the TPMS model scaffolds with three different porosities   After 8 weeks of degradation, its ultimate compressive
            to meet this requirement. For TPMS models with 50, 60,   strength is still 47.89 ± 3.67 Mpa, equivalent to a decrease
            and 70% porosity, the strain during collapse and breakage   of only 28%. With an increase in porosity, the compressive
            is 5.4 ± 0.36, 5.62 ± 0.43, and 5.37 ± 0.41, respectively. The   strength decreases rapidly. With the increase in porosity,
            strain during collapse does not change significantly with   the  difference  in  the  compressive  strength  between  the
            an increase in scaffold porosity, indicating that the ductility   TPMS model scaffold and open-rod scaffold becomes
            of bone tissue-engineered scaffolds made of the same   increasingly obvious.
            material is unrelated to porosity. However, it is related to
            the structure of the support. The ultimate compressive   3.3. Analysis of pH change in degradation solution
            strength of the open-rod models with 50, 60, and 70%   during scaffold degradation
            porosity is 43 ± 3.97 Mpa, 38 ± 1.85 Mpa, and 32 ± 5.32 Mpa,   As shown in Figure 8, the initial sharp increase in pH over
            respectively. Compared with TPMS scaffolds with the same   time is due to the exchange of calcium silicate cations,
            porosity, the ultimate compressive strength is reduced by   especially Ca , with H  or H O  in the SBF. After 4 days of
                                                                         2+
                                                                                 +
                                                                                        +
                                                                                      3
            approximately 20 Mpa. The ultimate compressive strength   degradation, the pH level reaches a relatively stable level,
            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        263                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.708
   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276