Page 299 - IJB-9-3
P. 299

International Journal of Bioprinting                  3D bioprinting as a prospective therapeutic strategy for LSCD



            various cell populations, such as limbal fibroblasts and   operators, difficulty in high-throughput  manufacturing,
            melanocytes, which are also necessary for maintenance of   and low efficiency. 3D printing technology supports mass
            limbal stem cells and corneal epithelium regeneration. The   production of target structure with less time and cost, and
            local signals generated in the limbal cellular niche will affect   can directly modify the required model through computers
            the corresponding daughter cells generated by stem cell   according to specific needs, greatly reducing requirements
            division to follow different cell fates. In some studies, these   for operators since there are no manual operations involved.
            signals  are  simulated  by  adding  drugs,  small  molecules,   The problem of manual error in manufacturing process is
            cytokines, growth factors, etc., as the modulation strategies   avoided. With the development of 3D printing technology,
            to affect limbal stem cells in artificial graft. Some studies   it may achieve high-throughput manufacturing and
            have shown that limbal basement membrane may promote   customization of cornea limbal substitutes. In addition,
            the stability of limbal cellular niche and provide key   3D printing can create microstructure such as micropores
            factors for cell regeneration [58,59] . Simulating and high-  in complex structures, thus controlling the physical and
            precision positioning the components of limbal basement   chemical properties of printed scaffold at microlevel.
            membrane, including collagen (IV, XVI), laminin (α1,   3D printing supports the on-demand distribution of a
            γ3), tenascin C, and other components  is achievable   variety of materials. Many studies focus on 3D printing with
                                             [60]
            through 3D printing. At present, the complexity and   growth factors, drugs, and bioactive materials. For example,
            heterogeneousness of different components and activities   sustained drug release and other functions can be achieved
            in limbal cellular niche remains enigmatic. 3D printing   by  combining  bioink/structure  as  a  carrier  with  specific
            with multicomponent may enable further researches on   drugs at target location. On the one hand, it may promote
            the physiological activities of corneal limbus.    rapid recovery and reduce inflammation, eliminating the
            4.2. Target structure                              need to administer medications after surgery. On the other
            The artificial limbus has the characteristics of a high cell   hand, 3D-printed cornea-on-chip could change the type and
            density as well as a multiunit, multilayer, and curved   location of materials according to research needs, providing
            surface. Some studies have shown that the position of cells   a more realistic model for limbal medical research.
            affects proliferation ability. Limbal basal cells located at the   As a carrier attached to bioactive materials such as cells
            limbus perform better in culture [61,62] . The regeneration of   and factors, inks for 3D-printed structure shall meet the
            the limbus requires shape control and the restoration of   following conditions:
            corneal epithelial function. Compared with 2D structure,
            biomaterials in 3D structure can better simulate the     (i)  Meet the requirements of 3D printing principles and
            characteristics of cornea, so that researchers and clinicians   processes on physical properties
            can better recognize the proliferation, differentiation, and    (ii)  Stable forming units can be printed and quickly
            diffusion of corneal cells. 3D bioprinting can accurately   solidified
            locate the cell position, simulate the natural corneal limbus
            structure, distribute limbal stem cells and primary epithelial    (iii)  Rapid adhesion between forming units with high
            cells  according to  needs,  and  provide  carrier  tissue  for   fidelity
            limbal stem cells and epithelial cells. 3D printing has been    (iv)  Suitable swelling characteristics and shape stability
            used in corneal tissue regeneration engineering [63-66] , with   in osmotic pressure balance state
            these studies proving that 3D printing has extremely high
            potential in the printing of limbal stem cells. As shown    (v)  Maintain high transparency in recipient eye
            in  Figure 3, additive manufacturing has the ability to    (vi)  Support the basic physiological and chemical
            change the distribution of donor biopsy from single point   functions of cells and other bioactive substances
            to multipoint and from single layer to multilayer, so as to     (vii)  Physical and chemical changes during printing
            realize multiple epithelial cell sources and cover a wider   process and transplantation will not damage cells
            area on surface of recipient cornea. If the distribution   and other bioactive substances
            of limbal cells of cornea can be  simulated as  ring-like
            arrangement in natural cornea, the least amount of limbus     (viii)  Promote tissue regeneration after implantation, or it
            stem cells, which means the minimum volume of donor     can be stably retained in the body for a long time
            biopsy, is able to support a larger epithelial coverage.   Several important factors should be considered when
               Conventional tissue engineering largely depends on   selecting bioink for corneal limbal regeneration, including
            manual operation, which has many problems, such as   mechanical properties  (viscoelasticity, stiffness, strength,
            manual error, low repeatability, high requirements for   elasticity,  surface  quality,  and  integrity),  microstructure



            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        291                          https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.710
   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304