Page 441 - IJB-9-3
P. 441

International Journal of Bioprinting              Gelatin-PVA crosslinked genipin bioinks for skin tissue engineering


            hydrogels. Hydrogels with varying PVA concentration   according to Figure 7B, the cell viability decreased with the
            were initially examined for morphology using SEM   addition of PVA for GPVA3_GNP and GPVA5_GNP (93.5
            in  Figure 6A. The results demonstrated that both NC   ± 0.7% and 94.5 ± 0.7%, respectively). Moreover, as stated
            and  GNP  hydrogels  have  a  porous  structure  with   in Figure 7C, the printed bioinks have a cell attachment
            interconnected porosity  with  open  and closed  pores.   activity of 100%.
            Hydrogels with higher concentrations of PVA show
            smaller  pore  sizes. A  high  concentration  of  PVA in   3.9. Proliferation of fibroblasts
            the polymer solution appears to impede the hydrogel   The proliferation of fibroblasts encapsulated in the GE_
            from forming a homogeneous pore-like structure. The   GNP, GPVA3_GNP, and GPVA5_GNP was evaluated using
            average pore sizes, as shown in Figure 6D, for GE_NC,   MTT assay after 1, 5, and 7 days of incubation, as shown in
            GPVA3_NC, and  GPVA5_NC  are 123.69 ± 47.10  µm,   Figure 7C. A significantly higher level of cell proliferation
            67.44 ± 22.20 µm, and 98.48 ± 28.55 µm, respectively.   was observed in GPVA3_GNP formulation (108.95 ±
            However, GE_GNP, GPVA3_GNP, and GPVA5_GNP          2.75%), followed by GPVA5_GNP (105.5 ± 2.12%) on day
            (136.68 ± 63.31 µm, 121.62 ± 58.73 µm, and 119.59 ±   7. As clearly shown in Figure 7C, after addition of PVA,
            49.34 µm) have larger pore sizes with irregular structure   the cell viability of HDFs that grew was greater than the
            as compared to NC hydrogels.
                                                               cell viability in the GE_GNP. From day 1 until day 7, the
              Moreover, Figure 6C presents the percentage of porosity   HDFs were encapsulated in the bioinks never ceased to
            of hydrogels. All of the hydrogels showed porosities ranging   proliferate.
            from 70% to 85%. The porosity of GPVA5_GNP was the
            lowest (71 ± 1.73%), whereas the porosity of GPVA3_GNP   3.10. In vitro wound healing assay
            and GE_GNP was slightly increased (76 ± 1.73%, and 77   An  in vitro  scratch  wound experiment  using  human
            ± 2.30%). However, the porosity of GE_NC, GPVA3_NC,   dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) cells was used to evaluate
            and GPVA5_NC is (86 ± 1%, 79.3 ± 1.15%, and 76.6 ±   the effect of the gelatin-PVA biomaterial leachate
            2.89%), respectively.                              media on wound healing. Sub-confluent or confluent
            3.7. Atomic force microscopy                       HDFs  were  supplemented  with  biomaterial  leachate
                                                               media  (GE_GNP, GPVA3_GNP, and  GPVA5_GNP),
            Figure 6B shows 3D topography photographs of the surface   and  HDFs  supplemented  with  full  medium  served  as
            roughness of the hydrogels. Figure 6E presents a summary   the positive control (Figure 7E). Further evaluation on
            of the acquired results. The surface roughness of hydrogels   wound healing progression is shown in Figure 7F, which
            helps to maintain the cellular behavior and cell adhesion   presents a comparison of healing progress between the
            activity. The rough surface might cause the membranes to   group treated with leachate media and the control group.
            be highly hydrophobic. The surface roughness increased   A  faster healing progression was observed in the GE_
            with an increase in the concentration of PVA in GPVA3_  GNP, GPVA3_GNP, and GPV5_GNP (91.85 ± 1.76%,
            NC, GPVA3_GNP, GPVA5_NC, and GPVA5_GNP (14.79      98.67 ± 0.568%, and 99.67 ± 0.578%) after 72 h treatment
            ± 0.04 Ra, 67.57 ± 8.20 Ra, 94.26 ± 1.18 Ra, and 108.26 ±
            8.58 Ra, respectively).                            with biomaterial leachate media. This shows that the
                                                               rate of wound healing was significantly higher than the
            3.8. Cell viability                                rate of healing in the control group, demonstrating the

            Biocompatibility  of  the 3D  bioprinted  GPVA  hydrogels   effectiveness of the GE_GNP, GPVA3_NP, and GPVA5_
            is an important aspect of any ECM-mimicking matrix.   GNP in wound healing.
            Fibroblasts play an essential role in wound healing   3.11. Cell morphology
            primarily in the proliferative and remodeling stages.
            Figure 7A presents live/dead fluorescence staining images   The SEM images of cell culture within the bioink are
            of printed HDFs after 24 h post-printing. Live cells were   shown in  Figure 7D. The photomicrographs also reveal
            stained green, while dead cells were stained red. The HDFs   the growth, morphology, and spreading of HDFs within
            were  uniformly  distributed  over  the  3D  structure.  The   the  matrix.  The high-magnification images  show that
            fluorescent pictures revealed no obvious morphological   the HDFs seems attached to the base of the bioscaffold
            abnormalities, and there were no significant changes in   surface. The SEM images also show that the HDFs are in
            the red fluorescence (dead cells) ratio between the groups.   spherical cell shape rather than the normal morphology
            During the 1-day staining growth, the cells were all   that was more elongated. The circular form of the HDFs
            adherent, and morphologically, the cells maintained good   implies that their lamellipodia or filopodia do not spread
            growth, which was consistent for all hydrogels. However,   initially.


            Volume 9 Issue 3 (2023)                        433                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.677
   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446