Page 109 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D-Printed liver model

Ethics approval and consent to participate 10. Cooper JB, Taqueti VR, 2004, A brief history of the
development of mannequin simulators for clinical education
Not applicable. and training. Qual Saf Health Care, 13:563–570.

Consent for publication https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009886
11. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, et al., 2018, Additive
Not applicable. manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials,
methods, applications and challenges. Compos B Eng, 143:
Availability of data 172-196:172–196.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.02.012
12. Nikitichev DI, Patel P, Avery J, et al., 2018, Chapter 6: Patient-
References specific 3D printed models for education, research and
surgical simulation, in 3D Printing, IntechOpen Limited,
1. Preece D, Williams SB, Lam R, et al., 2013, Let’s get physical: London, United Kingdom.
Advantages of a physical model over 3D computer models
and textbooks in learning imaging anatomy. Anat Sci Educ, https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.79667
6(4):216–224. 13. Waran V, Narayanan V, Karuppiah R, et al., 2014, Injecting
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1345 realism in surgical training-initial simulation experience
with custom 3D models, J Surg Educ, 71(2):193–197.
2. Khot Z, Quinlan K, Norman GR, et al., 2013, The
relative effectiveness of computer-based and traditional https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2013.08.010
resources for education in anatomy. Anat Sci Educ, 6(4): 14. Wang K, Wu C, Qian Z, et al., 2016, Dual-material 3D printed
211–215. metamaterials with tunable mechanical properties for patient-
https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1355 specific tissue-mimicking phantoms. Addit Manuf, 12:31–37.
3. Wang K, Ho CC, Zhang C, et al., 2017, A review on the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2016.06.006
3D printing of functional structures for medical phantoms 15. Yeo J, Koh J, Wang F, et al., (eds.), 2020, Chapter 9: 3D
and regenerated tissue and organ applications. Engineering, printing silicone materials and devices, in Silicon Containing
3(5):653–662. Hybrid Copolymers, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENG.2017.05.013 https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527823499.ch9
4. Pugliese L, Marconi S, Negrello E, et al., 2018, The 16. Spectroplast AG,
clinical use of 3D printing in surgery. Updates Surg, 70(3):
381–388. https://spectroplast.com/, viewed 04.08.2022
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-018-0586-5 17. Stratasys Ltd,
5. Tack P, Victor J, Gemmel P, et al., 2016, 3D printing https://stratasys.com/medical/advanced-medical-models,
techniques in a medical setting: A systematic literature viewed 04.08.2022
review. Biomed Eng Online, 15(115). 18. Deltatower GmbH,
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-016-0236-4
https://deltatower.ch/en/home-2/, viewed 04.08.2022
6. Mohan P, Marzougui D, Kan CD, 2009, Development and 19. CR-3D,
validation of hybrid III crash test dummy. SAE Technical Paper.
www.cr3d.de/3d-drucker/liquid-serie/, viewed 02.11.2022
https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0473
20. Lynxter SAS,
7. Humphrey C, Kumaratilake J, 2016, Ballistics and anatomical
modelling—A review. Leg Med, 23(12):21–29. lynxter.fr/en/product/3d-printing-silicone-toolhead-liq21/,
viewed 02.11.2022
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2016.09.002
8. Trehan K, Kemp CD, Yang SC, 2014, Simulation in 21. Qiu K, Haghiashtiani G, McAlpine MC, 2018, 3D printed
cardiothoracic surgical training: Where do we stand? JTCS, organ models for surgical applications. Annu Rev Anal
147(1):18–24. Chem, 11(1):287–306.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.007 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anchem-061417-125935
9. Kurt E, Yurdakul SE, Atac A, 2013, An overview of the 22. Estermann SJ, Pahr DH, Reisinger A, 2020, Quantifying
technologies used for anatomy education in terms of medical tactile properties of liver tissue, silicone elastomers, and
history. Proc Soc, 103:109–115. a 3D printed polymer for manufacturing realistic organ
models. Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 104:103630.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.314
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103630

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 101 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.721