Page 294 - IJB-9-4

International Journal of Bioprinting 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced PLA/PGA composites

for the manufacture of biodegradable load-bearing bone 5. Kaur M, Singh K, 2019, Review on titanium and titanium
implants. based alloys as biomaterials for orthopaedic applications.
Mater Sci Eng C, 102:844–862.
Acknowledgments https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2019.04.064
None. 6. Chen CH, Chang WJ, Chen YS, et al., 2022, Development of
a novel hybrid suture anchor for osteoporosis by integrating
Funding titanium 3D printing and traditional machining. Int J
Bioprint, 8(4):608.
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation
of Xinjiang, China (grant number 2022D01C393). https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i4.608
7. Wang F, Chen H, Yang P, et al., 2020, Three-dimensional
Conflict of interest printed porous tantalum prosthesis for treating inflammation
The authors declare no conflict of interest. after total knee arthroplasty in one-stage surgery: A case
report. J Int Med Res, 48(3):300060519891280.
Author contributions https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060519891280
Conceptualization: Patiguli Aihemaiti, Ru Jia 8. Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Shivaram A, et al., 2019, Direct
Investigation: Patiguli Aihemaiti, Ru Jia, Houfeng Jiang, comparison of additively manufactured porous titanium
Ayiguli Kasimu and tantalum implants towards in vivo osseointegration.
Supervision: Wurikaixi Aiyiti Addit Manuf, 28:259–266.
Writing – original draft: Patiguli Aihemaiti, Ru Jia https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2019.04.025
Writing – review & editing: Patiguli Aihemaiti, Ru Jia, 9. Haleem A, Javaid M, 2019, Polyether ether ketone (PEEK)
Wurikaixi Aiyiti and its 3D printed implants applications in medical field: An
overview. Clin Epidemiol Global Health, 7(4):571–577.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.01.003
Not applicable. 10. Liu D, Fu J, Fan H, et al., 2018, Application of 3D-printed

Consent for publication PEEK scapula prosthesis in the treatment of scapular benign
fibrous histiocytoma: A case report. J Bone Oncol, 12:78–82.
Not applicable. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2018.07.012

Availability of data 11. Manam NS, Harun WSW, Shri DNA, et al., 2017, Study of
corrosion in biocompatible metals for implants: A review. J
Data can be obtained from the corresponding author upon Alloys Compd, 701:698–715.
reasonable request. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.196
References 12. Chen Z, Chen Y, Ding J, et al., 2023, Blending strategy to
modify PEEK-based orthopedic implants. Compos Part B
1. Javaid M, Haleem A, 2018, Additive manufacturing Eng, 250:110427.
applications in orthopaedics: A review. J Clin Orthop
Trauma, 9(3):202–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110427
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.04.008 13. Baptista R, Guedes M, 2021, Morphological and mechanical
characterization of 3D printed PLA scaffolds with controlled
2. Rony L, Lancigu R, Hubert L, 2018, Intraosseous porosity for trabecular bone tissue replacement. Mater Sci
metal implants in orthopedics: A review. Morphologie, Eng C Mater Biol Appl, 118:111528.
102(339):231–242.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msec.2020.111528
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.morpho.2018.09.003
14. Saniei H, Mousavi S, 2020, Surface modification of PLA
3. Tong Y, Kaplan DJ, Spivak JM, et al., 2020, Three-dimensional 3D-printed implants by electrospinning with enhanced
printing in spine surgery: A review of current applications. bioactivity and cell affinity. Polymer, 196:122467.
Spine J, 20(6):833–846.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2020.122467
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.11.004
15. Myers D, Abdel-Wahab A, Hafeez F, et al., 2022, Optimisation
4. Li C, Pisignano D, Zhao Y, et al., 2020, Advances in medical of the additive manufacturing parameters of polylactic acid
applications of additive manufacturing. Engineering, (PLA) cellular structures for biomedical applications. J Mech
6(11):1222–1231. Behav Biomed Mater, 136:105447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2020.02.018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2022.105447

Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023) 286 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.734