Page 290 - IJB-9-4
P. 290

International Journal of Bioprinting                 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced PLA/PGA composites






































            Figure 11. Positions of polyglycolic acid (PGA) fibers in the deposition lines with different layer thicknesses. (A) 0.15 mm, (B) 0.20 mm, and (C) 0.25 mm.
            Abbreviation: PLA, polylactic acid.

            result in a lower extrusion pressure, which would not help   layer thickness was 0.2 mm (Figure 12B), the PGA fibers
            the material expand to the sides, ultimately leading to a   also showed an inverted trapezoid shape, but the trapezoid
            circular deposition line. Similarly, the loose and soft PGA   height was slightly higher and the fine fibers were loose.
            fibers also required an extrusion pressure to embed them   When the layer thickness was 0.25 mm (Figure 12C), there
            into the molten matrix materials. A smaller layer thickness   were distinct gaps between the deposition lines, and the
            was more conducive to pressing the fibers into the bottom   sections  of  the  PGA  fibers  were  approximately  circular.
            of the matrix, and the flowing matrix material was more   There were also distinct gaps between the fine fibers of the
            likely to wrap around the fibers. When the printing layer   PGA fiber bundle, indicating that the compaction effect of
            thickness  was  too large,  the  PGA  fibers  could  easily   the nozzle bottom surface on the extruded material was
            float on the surface of the deposition line due to the low   not significant.
            extrusion pressure effect of the nozzle. Furthermore, the
            fibers tended to be pulled out during the printing process,   3.4.3. Fracture analysis
            resulting in printing failure when the layer thickness was   Figure 13 shows the cross-sectional FESEM images of
            too large.                                         the fractured specimens printed by schemes 6, 7, and 8,
                                                               for which the printing speeds were 7 mm/s (Figure 13A),
            3.4.2. Morphologies of cross-sections of specimens  8 mm/s (Figure 13B), and 9 mm/s (Figure 13C), respectively.
            Figure  12  shows cross-sectional photographs  of the   There were no significant differences in the cross-sectional
            specimens with layer thicknesses of 0.15, 0.2, and 0.25 mm.   morphologies of the specimens printed at different printing
            The cross-sectional surface of each specimen was polished   speeds. The PGA fibers were well bonded to the matrix,
            with  1200-mesh  sandpaper  and  then  treated  with  the   without many fibers being pulled out. However, when the
            ultrasonic cleaner to clean the surface and the residual   printing speed increased from 7 to 9 mm/s, the widths of
            material in the crevasses. When the layer thickness was   the single deposition lines became narrow, and overlapping
            0.15 mm (Figure 12A), the combination of the deposited   voids between two adjacent deposition lines formed. When
            lines was very tight, the PGA fibers were pressed into an   the printing speed was 9 mm/s, the deposition lines were
            inverted trapezoid and embedded well in the PLA matrix,   relatively narrow, and the voids between deposition lines
            and the fine PGA fibers were also pressed closely. When the   were relatively large.


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        282                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.734
   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295