Page 286 - IJB-9-4
P. 286

International Journal of Bioprinting                 3D printing of continuous fiber reinforced PLA/PGA composites




























            Figure 7. (A) Stress–strain curves of specimens with different printing spacings and (B) tensile strengths of specimens with different printing spacings.
            The tests were used to determine significant differences between groups (**p < 0.01, ****p < 0.0001; “•” represents the tensile test results of each specimen).



























            Figure 8. (A) Stress–strain curves of specimens with different printing speeds and (B) tensile strengths of specimens with different printing speeds. The
            tests were used to determine significant differences between groups (“ns” indicates no significance; “•” represents the tensile test results of each specimen).


            96.13 ± 8.09 MPa, decreasing by 117.7%. Figure 8 shows   after fracture are shown in  Figure 9.  Figures 9A and  B
            the effect of the printing speed on the tensile strength.   show the tensile curve and fractured specimen of scheme
            The tensile strength did not exhibit a significant difference   3, which was printed with the maximum layer thickness
            among the three printing speeds.                   (0.25 mm). The specimen fracture mode of scheme 3 was

               The 3DFFSMS analysis was conducted to study the   quite different from those of other specimens. After the
            failure mode of the specimens during the tensile process.   PLA matrix material was debonded from the PGA fibers,
            The strain cloud is the strain distribution on the specimen   continuous single fibers worked as the main component to
            surface measured by 3DFFSMS. During the tensile test, the   bear the tensile stress. No more data were collected by the
            color and shape of the strain cloud change in real time, and   3DFFSMS after point IV on the stress–strain curve. As the
            the red area represents the area with large strain. The strain   tensile test continued, the internal fibers were gradually
            clouds corresponding to the marked points on the stress–  pulled off, and the printed layer was gradually debonded
            strain curves of schemes 3, 4, and 6 and the specimens   until the test stopped. It can be seen from Figure 9B that


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        278                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.734
   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291