Page 339 - IJB-9-4
P. 339

International Journal of Bioprinting                           3D printing in bone regeneration and bone repair



            Ethics approval and consent to participate         13.  Hutmacher DW, Sittinger M, Risbud MV, 2004, Scaffold-
                                                                  based tissue engineering: Rationale for computer-aided
            Not applicable.                                       design and solid free-form fabrication systems.  Trends
                                                                  Biotechnol, 22(7):354–362.
            Consent for publication
                                                               14.  Arafat MT, Gibson I, Li X, 2014, State of the art and future
            Not applicable.                                       direction of additive manufactured scaffolds-based bone
                                                                  tissue engineering. Rapid Prototyp J, 20(1):1355–2546.
            Availability of data                               15.  Sharma GK, Pant P, Jain PK, et al., 2021, On the suitability of
            All data are reported in the present manuscript and not   induction heating system for metal additive manufacturing.
            elsewhere.                                            Proc Inst Mech Eng Part B J Eng Manuf, 235(1-2):219–229.
                                                               16.  Yang Y, Wang G, Liang H, et al., 2019, Additive manufacturing
            References                                            of bone scaffolds. Int J Bioprint, 5(1):148.

                                                               17.  Mei Q, Rao J, Bei HP, et al., 2021, 3D bioprinting photo-
            1.   Park JY, Shim JH, Choi SA,  et al., 2015, 3D printing
               technology to control BMP-2 and VEGF delivery spatially   crosslinkable hydrogels for bone and cartilage repair. Int J
                                                                  Bioprint, 7(3):367.
               and temporally to promote large-volume bone regeneration.
               J Mater Chem B, 3(27):5415–5425.                18.  Vyas A, Bandhu Ghosh S, Bandyopadhyayg phot S, et al.,
                                                                  2022, Digital light processing mediated 3D printing of
            2.   Samitier G, Alentorn-Geli E, Taylor DC, et al., 2015, Sports
               traumatology, arthroscopy, meniscal allograft transplantation.   biocomposite bone scaffolds: Physicoissue engineeringolume
               Part 1: Systematic review of graft biology, graft shrinkage,   bone regeneration. Polymer Composites, 43(5):3175–3188.
               graft  extrusion,  graft sizing, and  graft fixation.  Knee Surg   19.  Bandyopadhyay A, Mitra I, Bose SJC, 2020, 3D printing for
               Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 23(1):310–322.          bone regeneration. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 18(5):505–514.
            3.   Yazdanpanah Z, Johnston JD, Cooper DM, et al., 2022, 3D   20.  Li X, Yuan Y, Liu L, et al., 2020, Manufacturing, 3D printing
               bioprinted scaffolds for bone tissue engineering: State-of-  of  hydroxyapatite/tricalcium phosphate scaffold  with
               the-art and emerging technologies. Front Bioeng Biotechnol,   hierarchical porous structure for bone regeneration. Biodes
               10:824156.                                         Manuf, 3(1):15–29.
            4.   Feng W, Li D, Zang J, et al., 2017, Biomechanical comparison   21.  Grémare A, Guduric V, Bareille R,  et al., 2018,
               of xenogeneic bone material treated with different methods.   Characterization of printed PLA scaffolds for bone tissue
               Xenotransplantation, 24(6):e12343.                 engineering. J Biomed Mater Res A, 106(4):887–894.
            5.   Turnbull G, Clarke J, Picard F,  et al., 2018, 3D bioactive   22.  Cavo M, Scaglione S, 2016, Scaffold microstructure effects
               composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.  Bioact   on functional and mechanical performance: Integration of
               Mater, 3(3):278–314.                               theoretical  and experimental approaches  for  bone  tissue
            6.   Seol YJ, Park DY, Park JY, et al., 2013, A new method of   engineering applications. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl,
               fabricating robust freeform 3D ceramic scaffolds for bone   68:872–879.
               tissue regeneration. Biotechnol Bioeng, 110(5):1444–1455.  23.  Wang C, Huang W, Zhou Y, et al., 2020, 3D printing of bone
            7.   Sultana N, 2013, Biodegradable Polymer-Based Scaffolds for   tissue engineering scaffolds. Bioact Mater, 5(1):82–91.
               Bone Tissue Engineering, Springer Berlin, Germany.  24.  Hassan MN, Yassin MA, Suliman S, et al., 2019, The bone
            8.   Hutmacher DW, 2001, Scaffold design and fabrication   regeneration capacity of 3D-printed templates in calvarial
               technologies  for  engineering  tissues—State  of  the  art  and   defect models: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta
               future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed, 12(1):107–124.  Biomater, 91:1–23.
            9.   Roseti L, Parisi V, Petretta M, et al., 2017, Scaffolds for bone   25.  Bose S, Sarkar N, 2020, Natural medicinal compounds in
               tissue engineering: State of the art and new perspectives.   bone tissue engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 38(4):404–417.
               Mater Sci Eng C, 78:1246–1262.                  26.  Wang Z, Wang Y, Yan J,  et  al., 2021, Pharmaceutical
            10.  Melchels FP, Barradas AM, Van Blitterswijk CA, et al., 2010,   electrospinning and 3D printing scaffold design for bone
               Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on   regeneration. Adv Drug Deliv Rev, 174:504–534.
               cell seeding and culturing. Acta Biomater, 6(11):4208–4217.  27.  Li Z, Du T, Ruan C, et al., 2021, Bioinspired mineralized
            11.  Varma MV, Kandasubramanian B, Ibrahim SM, 2020, 3D   collagen scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Bioact Mater,
               printed scaffolds for biomedical applications. Mater Chem   6(5):1491–1511.
               Phys, 255:123642.                               28.  Zhao H, Liu JB, Bao ZF, et al., 2021, Global research trends
            12.  Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D, 2005, Porosity of 3D biomaterial   in dental stem cells: A bibliometric and visualized study.
               scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials, 26(27):5474–5491.  Tissue Eng Part B: Rev, 28(4):733–744.


            Volume 9 Issue 4 (2023)                        331                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.737
   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344