Page 345 - IJB-9-5

International Journal of Bioprinting Review of 4D-printed smart medical implants

105. Ge Q, Qi HJ, Dunn ML, 2013, Active materials by four- 116. Zhang F, Wang L, Zheng Z, et al., 2019, Magnetic
dimension printing. Appl Phys Lett, 103(13): 131901. programming of 4D printed shape memory composite
structures. Compos Part A Appl Sci Manuf, 125: 105571.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4819837
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105571
106. Varga LG, Takacs JD, Domotor FD, et al., 2018, Tailor-
made 3D model design of human implants for additive 117. Zheng Y, Han MKL, Jiang Q, et al., 2020, 4D hydrogel
technologies. Proceedings of the 23rd International for dynamic cell culture with orthogonal, wavelength-
Conference on Manufacturing (Manufacturing). dependent mechanical and biochemical cues. Mater Horiz,
7(1): 111–116.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/448/1/012060
https://doi.org/10.1039/c9mh00665f
107. Lee MY, Chang CC, Lin CC, et al., 2002, Custom implant 118. Rosales AM, Anseth KS, 2016, The design of reversible
design for patients with cranial defects. IEEE Eng Med Biol hydrogels to capture extracellular matrix dynamics. Nat Rev
Mag, 21(2): 38–44.
Mater, 1(2): 15012.
https://doi.org/10.1109/memb.2002.1000184 https://doi.org/10.1038/natrevmats.2015.12
108. You D, Chen G, Liu C, et al., 2021, 4D printing of multi- 119. Farrukh A, Paez JI, del Campo A, 2019, 4D biomaterials for
responsive membrane for accelerated in vivo bone healing light-guided angiogenesis. Adv Funct Mater, 29(6): 1807734.
via remote regulation of stem cell fate. Adv Funct Mater,
31(40): 2103920. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201807734
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202103920 120. Liu L, Shadish JA, Arakawa CK, et al., 2018, Cyclic stiffness
modulation of cell-laden protein-polymer hydrogels in
109. Cui C, Kim D-O, Pack MY, et al., 2020, 4D printing of
self-folding and cell-encapsulating 3D microstructures as response to user-specified stimuli including light. Adv
Biosyst, 2(12): 1800240.
scaffolds for tissue-engineering applications. Biofabrication,
12(4): 045018. https://doi.org/10.1002/adbi.201800240
https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aba502 121. Douillet C, Nicodeme M, Hermant L, et al., 2022, From local
110. Wang Y, Cui H, Wang Y, et al., 4D printed cardiac construct to global matrix organization by fibroblasts: A 4D laser-
with aligned myofibers and adjustable curvature for assisted bioprinting approach. Biofabrication, 14(2): 025006.
myocardial regeneration. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 13(11): https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ac40ed
12746–12758.
122. Diaz-Payno PJ, Kalogeropoulou M, Muntz I, et al., 2022,
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c17610 Swelling-dependent shape-based transformation of a human
111. Zhang C, Cai D, Liao P, et al., 2021, 4D printing of shape- mesenchymal stromal cells-laden 4D bioprinted construct
memory polymeric scaffolds for adaptive biomedical for cartilage tissue engineering. Adv Healthc Mater, 12(2):
implantation. Acta Biomater, 122: 101–110. 2201891.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.12.042 https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.202201891
112. Lin C, Lv J, Li Y, et al., 2019, 4D-printed biodegradable and 123. Arakawa CK, Badeau BA, Zheng Y, et al., 2017, Multicellular
remotely controllable shape memory occlusion devices. Adv vascularized engineered tissues through user-programmable
Funct Mater, 29(51): 1906569. biomaterial photodegradation. Adv Mater, 29(37): 1703156.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201906569 https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703156
113. Hearon K, Wierzbicki MA, Nash LD, et al., 2015, A 124. Hendrikson WJ, Rouwkema J, Clementi F, et al., 2017, Towards
processable shape memory polymer system for biomedical 4D printed scaffolds for tissue engineering: Exploiting 3D
applications. Adv Healthc Mater, 4(9): 1386–1398. shape memory polymers to deliver time-controlled stimulus
on cultured cells. Biofabrication, 9(3): 031001.
https://doi.org/10.1002/adhm.201500156
114. Hu Y, Wang Z, Jin D, et al., 2020, Botanical-inspired 4D https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/aa8114
printing of hydrogel at the microscale. Adv Funct Mater, 125. Chen M, Li L, Xia L, et al., 2020, Temperature responsive
30(4): 1907377. shape-memory scaffolds with circumferentially aligned
https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201907377 nanofibers for guiding smooth muscle cell behavior.
Macromol Biosci, 20(2): 1900312.
115. Zhou W, Duan Z, Zhao J, et al., 2022, Glucose and MMP-
9 dual-responsive hydrogel with temperature sensitive https://doi.org/10.1002/mabi.201900312
self-adaptive shape and controlled drug release accelerates 126. Miao S, Cui H, Esworthy T, et al., 2020, 4D self-morphing
diabetic wound healing. Bioact Mater, 17: 1–17. culture substrate for modulating cell differentiation. Adv Sci,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.01.004 7(6): 1902403.

Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023) 337 https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.764