Page 491 - IJB-9-5
P. 491

International Journal of Bioprinting               CECM-GelMA bioinks of DLP 3D printing for corneal engineering





































            Figure 4. Transparency of the printed hydrogel. (A) Samples with no cells (materials: **, wavelength: ****); (B) cell-loaded samples cultured for 2 weeks
            (materials: **, wavelength: ****); (C) photographs showing the transparency of the printed GelMA hydrogel (left) and the printed CECM-GelMA hydrogel
            (right). The data (A–B) are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation and were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (n = 5, *p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p <
            0.0001).

               After that, the printed samples with printed curvature   toward the bottom of the dish was observed in the control
            were placed on “NKU” text to see how visible it was.   group during the test, resulting in a lower number of cells
            As shown in Figure 4C, the letters could be clearly seen   in the hydrogel. These findings demonstrated that CECM
            through the printed corneas. At the same time, the smooth   provided a suitable microenvironment for the fabrication
            double-curvature shape allowed for the basic refraction of   of functional artificial corneas, showing good cell viability
            the cornea.                                        of the composite hydrogels.
            3.4. Biological characterization of the hydrogel
            3.4.1. Live/dead analysis                          3.4.2. Immunofluorescence staining
            The 3D image taken by confocal microscopy after the live/  In order to get closer to the complex 3D environment as
            dead test is shown in Figure 5A. After 3D culture of hCFs,   cells  reside  in  vivo,  GelMA  solution  containing  CECM
            the results showed robust hCF survival in the composite   and resuspended hCFs is printed. According to the
            hydrogel. Due to the role of CECM, the hCFs can survive   immunofluorescence (IF) staining tests, corneal stromal
            and spread well in the interior as culture time increased   functional  protein  (lumican)  and  corneal  myofibroblast-
            Additionally, no sizable number of dead cells was found   specific marker (α-SMA) in the 3D-printed samples were
            in the experimental samples after 14 days of growth.   detected. After 1, 7, and 14 days of culture, the results
            According to statistical calculations, the cell viability   (Figure  6) showed that hCFs exhibited high expression
            results are shown in Figure 5B (n = 3). In the 3D-printed   of  lumican  (Figure S8  in  Supplementary  File)  and
            hydrogel loaded with hCFs, CECM-GelMA (~75.29%)    reduced expression of α-SMA in the composite hydrogels.
            showed a higher viability than pure GelMA (~62.31%) on   Conversely, the IF results of GelMA samples showed
            the first day after printing. After a longer culture, viability   that lumican was not detected and that α-SMA had low
            of hCFs in the CECM-GelMA group increased steadily   expression.
            (up to 94.84% after 2 weeks of culture), presumably due to   Furthermore, ALDH3A1, which is a protein mainly
            the role of CECM. In contrast, the GelMA group showed   distributed  in  keratocytes  and  plays  an  important  role
            a survival rate of 84.32% after 1 week of culture, with no   in maintaining the normal structure and transparency
            significant  changes  thereafter.  Meanwhile,  cell  migration   of the cornea, was detected by immunofluorescence


            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                        483                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.774
   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496