Page 83 - IJB-9-5
P. 83

International Journal of Bioprinting  Biocompatible BSA-GMA and TPP of 3D hydrogels with free radical type I photoinitiator



































































            Figure 3. The  effect of BSA-GMA concentration, methacrylation degree, and laser power on BSA-GMA polymerization line. SEM images of the
            polymerization lines of (A) R D , (B) R D , (C) R D , (D) R D , and (E) R D . (F) AFM image of R D  polymerization line. (G) The effect of laser
                                               52
                                                    40
                                             40
                                      30
                                        52
                                                                               40
                                                                                 52
                                                                35
                                                      15
                                                              40
                              20
                                 52
            power on the line width of BSA-GMA with different concentrations and degrees of methacrylation.
            structures were incomplete. Figure 3A–C shows SEM images   decreased from 18 to 5.6 mW (Figure 3C-E). Figure S3
            of the polymerization lines for different concentrations of   (Supplementary File) shows the line structure obtained
            BSA-GMA, with the threshold power decreasing from   by TPP with 30 wt% BSA as monomer and 0.5 wt% LAP
            13.6 to 5.6 mW as the BSA-GMA concentration increases   as initiator. The TPP process of the BSA+LAP system
            from 20 wt% to 40 wt%. As the degree of methacrylation   only occurs at the laser power range of 20–23.7 mW. The
            increased  from  15%  to  52%,  the  threshold  power   TPP ability of the pure BSA system was poor compared
            Volume 9 Issue 5 (2023)                         75                         https://doi.org/10.18063/ijb.752
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88