Page 136 - IJB-9-6
P. 136
International Journal of Bioprinting Exosome-based bioink for bioprinting
37. Tang Q, Lu B, He J, et al., 2022, Exosomes-loaded 47. Badylak SF, Taylor D, Uygun K, 2011, Annual Review of
thermosensitive hydrogels for corneal epithelium and Biomedical Engineering, Annual Reviews Inc, 27–53.
stroma regeneration. Biomaterials, 280: 121320.
48. Song JJ, Ott HC, 2011, Organ engineering based on
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121320 decellularized matrix scaffolds. Trends Mol Med, 17: 424–432.
38. Lin J, Wang Z, Huang J, et al., 2021, Microenvironment- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2011.03.005
protected exosome-hydrogel for facilitating endometrial
regeneration, fertility restoration, and live birth of offspring. 49. Londono R, Badylak SF, 2015, Biologic scaffolds for
Small, 17(11): 2007235. regenerative medicine: Mechanisms of in vivo remodeling.
Ann Biomed Eng, 43: 577–592.
https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202007235
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-014-1103-8
39. Rolland TJ, Peterson TE, Singh RD, et al., 2022, Exosome
biopotentiated hydrogel restores damaged skeletal muscle in 50. Yi HG, Jeong YH, Kim Y, et al., 2019, A bioprinted human-
a porcine model of stress urinary incontinence (vol 29, 58, glioblastoma-on-a-chip for the identification of patient-specific
2022). NPJ Regen Medi, 7(1): 1–17. responses to chemoradiotherapy. Nat Biomedi Eng, 3: 509–519.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41536-022-00260-5 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-019-0363-x
40. Zhang Y, Huo M, Wang Y, et al., 2022, A tailored bioactive 51. Wu Y, Wang J, Shi Y, et al., 2017, Implantation of brain-
3D porous poly(lactic-acid)-exosome scaffold with osteo- derived extracellular matrix enhances neurological recovery
immunomodulatory and osteogenic differentiation after traumatic brain injury. Cell Transplant, 26: 1224–1234.
properties. J BiolEng, 16(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963689717714090
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13036-022-00301-z 52. Barrs RW, Jia J, Silver SE, et al., 2020, Biomaterials for
41. Li Q, Gong S, Yao W, et al., 2021, Exosome loaded genipin bioprinting microvasculature. Chem Rev, 120: 10887–10949.
crosslinked hydrogel facilitates full thickness cutaneous https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00027
wound healing in rat animal model. Drug Deliv, 28: 884–893,
53. Valot L, Martinez J, Mehdi A, et al., 2019, Chemical insights
https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2021.1912210 into bioinks for 3D printing. Chem Soc Rev, 48: 4049–4086.
42. Fan L, Liu C, Chen X, et al., 2022, Exosomes-loaded https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00718c
electroconductive hydrogel synergistically promotes tissue
repair after spinal cord injury via immunoregulation and 54. Ozbolat IT, Hospodiuk M, 2016, Current advances and
enhancement of myelinated axon growth. Adv Sci, 9(13): future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting.
2105586. Biomaterials, 76: 321–343.
https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202105586 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.10.076
43. Liu S, Li R, Dou K, et al., 2023, Injectable thermo-sensitive 55. Xia Z, Jin S, Ye K, 2018, Tissue and organ 3D bioprinting.
hydrogel containing ADSC-derived exosomes for the SLAS Technol, 23: 301–314.
treatment of cavernous nerve injury. Carbohydr Polym, 300: https://doi.org/10.1177/2472630318760515
120226.
56. Leucht A, Volz AC, Rogal J, et al., 2020, Advanced gelatin-
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120226 based vascularization bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting
44. Li Y, Wang Min, Sun Meng, et al., 2022, Engineering of vascularized bone equivalents. Sci Rep, 10: 5330.
antioxidant poly (citrate-gallic acid)-exosome hybrid https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62166-w
hydrogel with microglia immunoregulation for traumatic
brain injury-post neuro-restoration. Compos Part B-Eng, 57. Li X, Liu B, Pei B, et al., 2020, Inkjet bioprinting of
242: 110034. biomaterials. Chem Rev, 120: 10793–10833.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110034 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00008
45. Yu Z, Hao R, Du J, et al., 2022, A human cornea-on-a-chip 58. Miri AK, Khalilpour A, Cecen B, et al., 2019, Multiscale
for the study of epithelial wound healing by extracellular bioprinting of vascularized models. Biomaterials, 198: 204–
vesicles. iScience, 25: 104200. 216.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104200 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.006
46. Shafei S, Khanmohammadi M, Heidari R, et al., 2020, 59. Suntornnond R, Ng WL, Huang X, et al., 2022, Improving
Exosome loaded alginate hydrogel promotes tissue printability of hydrogel-based bio-inks for thermal inkjet
regeneration in full-thickness skin wounds: An in vivo bioprinting applications via saponification and heat
study. J Biomed Mater Res Part A, 108: 545–556. treatment processes. J Mater Chem B, 10: 5989–6000.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.36835 https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb00442a
Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 128 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0114

