Page 315 - IJB-9-6
P. 315

International Journal of Bioprinting                                Progress in bioprinted ear reconstruction




            43.  Kozin ED, Black NL, Cheng JT,  et  al., 2016, Design,   cartilage for auricular reconstruction. J Biomed Mater Res
               fabrication, and in vitro testing of novel three-dimensionally   Part B Appl Biomater, 105(4): 1016–1028.
               printed tympanic membrane grafts.  Hear Res, 340:
               191–203.                                           https://10.1002/jbm.b.33639
               https://10.1016/j.heares.2016.03.005            50.  Visscher DO, Bos EJ, Peeters M, et al., 2016, Cartilage tissue
                                                                  engineering: Preventing tissue scaffold contraction using
            44.  Hirsch  JD,  Vincent  RL,  Eisenman  DJ,  2017,  Surgical   a 3D-printed polymeric cage. Tissue Eng Part C: Methods,
               reconstruction of the ossicular chain with custom 3D   22(6): 573–584.
               printed ossicular prosthesis. 3D Print Med, 3(15).
                                                                  https://10.1089/ten.tec.2016.0073
               https://10.1186/s41205-017-0015-2
                                                               51.  Visscher DO, Gleadall A, Buskermolen JK,  et al., 2018,
            45.  3DBio Therapeutics, 2022, Aurinovo for auricular
               reconstruction. ClinicalTrialsgov.                 Design and fabrication of a hybrid alginate hydrogel/poly(ε‐
                                                                  caprolactone)  mold  for  auricular  cartilage  reconstruction.
               https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04399239 (accessed   J Biomed Mater Res Part B: Appl Biomater, 107(6):
               December 7, 2022).                                 1711–1721.
            46.  Everett H, 2022, 3DBio conducts successful human ear   https://10.1002/jbm.b.34264
               reconstruction with 3D bioprinted Aurinovo implant. 3D
               Printing Industry.                              52.  Zopf DA, Mitsak AG, Flanagan CL, et al., 2014, Computer
                                                                  aided–designed,  3-dimensionally printed porous tissue
               https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3dbio-conducts-  bioscaffolds for craniofacial soft tissue reconstruction.
               successful-human-ear-reconstruction-with-3d-bioprinted-  Otolaryngol–Head Neck Surg, 152(1): 57–62.
               aurinovo-implant-210201/ (accessed December 7, 2022).
                                                                  https://10.1177/0194599814552065
            47.  Chang  B, Cornett A,  Nourmohammadi  Z,  et al.,  2020,
               Hybrid three‐dimensional–printed ear tissue scaffold with   53.  Xie X, Wu S, Mou S, et al., 2022, Microtissue‐based bioink
               autologous cartilage mitigates soft tissue complications. The   as a chondrocyte microshelter for DLP  bioprinting.  Adv
               Laryngoscope, 131(E5): 1008–1015.                  Healthc Mater, 11(1): 2201877.
               https://10.1002/lary.29114                         https://10.1002/adhm.202201877
            48.  Dong X, Askinas C, Kim J, et al., 2022, Efficient engineering   54.  Zopf DA, Flanagan CL, Mitsak AG,  et al., 2018, Pore
               of  human auricular  cartilage  through  mesenchymal  stem   architecture effects on chondrogenic potential of
               cell chaperoning. J Tissue Eng Regen Med, 16(6): 825–835.  patient-specific 3-dimensionally printed porous tissue
               https://10.1002/term.3332                          bioscaffolds for auricular tissue engineering.  Int J Pediatr
                                                                  Otorhinolaryngol, 114: 170–174.
            49.  Park JY, Choi Y-J, Shim J-H, et al., 2017, Development of
               a 3D cell printed structure as an alternative to autologs   https://10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.07.033
































            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        307                        https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0898
   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320