Page 320 - IJB-9-6
P. 320

International Journal of Bioprinting                              Rheology-informed machine learning model
























































            Figure 2. (A) Process of data acquisition: investigation of printing resolution and rheological assessment. 3D graphs of the collected data with printing
            parameters for the bioink compositions of (B) F127, (C) gelatin/xanthan gum, (D) alginate/CaCl , and (E) alginate/CNC composite.
                                                                         2
            using the algorithm to measure the strand size, as shown   material concentration, printing pressure, nozzle diameter,
            in  Figure S1 (Supplementary File). In particular, the   nozzle length, nozzle velocity, and printing resolution
            algorithm was composed of two main steps. The first step   was stored in the printing dataset. Furthermore, to create
            was finding the path line, which can decrease errors by   a sub-dataset for the rheological properties, 41 values of
            a missed detection of the line. Afterward, the image was   measured viscosity and 21 values of storage modulus data
            changed to grayscale, and a position where the centers of   were acquired at the angular frequency region from 0.1 to
            the maximum signals on each line matched the printing   10 rad/s and subsequently, saved with bioink information.
            path was found. The second step was to quantify the average
            strand size. Specifically, the image was reconstructed to a   2.5. Machine learning model
            binary one and cropped with white pixels to leave 2 mm   This study utilized two classical machine learning algorithms
            from the center lines to each side. Particularly, nine lines   (random forest [RF] and support vector machine [SVM]),
            in the cropped image were selected using a projection   two  conventional  machine  learning  models  (printing
            grade of white pixels. Specifically, when the path and   parameter-dependent machine learning model [PDML]
            the  selected  lines  were  matched  up, the average strand   and concentration-dependent machine learning model
            size of the scaffolds was calculated. The information on   [CDML]), and a developed multi-input machine learning


            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        312                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.1280
   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325