Page 373 - IJB-9-6
P. 373

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Aflatoxin B1-induced cancer stem cells




































            Figure 2. Confocal images of single tumor spheroids treated with aflatoxin B1 concentration of (a) 0, (b) 1, (c) 2.5, and (d) 5 μM. The expression of CD133
            and ALDH1 was indicated by green and red colors, respectively, while the nucleus of single cancer cells was indicated by blue color. (e) Fluorescence
            intensities of CD133 and ALDH1 measured from the obtained images as a function of aflatoxin B1 concentration. All scale bars: 10 μm. **P < 0.01, ***P
            < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.

            spheroids showed different growth rate; spheroid number   HepG2 cell surface, while ALDH1 exists in the cytosol of
            18 grew up the most significantly by more than 220%,   HepG2 cells. Therefore, in HepG2 cells where both markers
            whereas the least growing spheroid, numbered 12, grew up   are found, an absolute overlap of these two markers cannot
            by only 42% (Figure 1e). However, the difference in the size   be  detected.  Instead,  the  fluorescence  image  of  CD133
            of spheroids was similar between the first day of 12.4 μm   surrounds that of ALDH1. As revealed by the images of
            (from 13.1 to 25.5 μm) and 7th day of 16.6 μm (from 27.2   single  spheroids, in the control, the fluorescence  images
            to 53.7 μm). This result suggests that the developed 3D   of CD133 and ALDH1 were shown in a small region of
            bioprinting model is an appropriate platform for 3D tumor   the single spheroids, whereas the fluorescent images were
            spheroid culture, which enabled the cells to grow naturally,   expanded to a much larger region of the single spheroids
            thereby preserving the heterogeneity of the cell population.   at an aflatoxin B1 concentration of 5 μM. In detail, the
            Moreover, as revealed in Figure S1 in Supplementary File,   average fluorescence intensities of two expressed markers
            the cell viabilities of tumor spheroids maintained more   were measured over the whole single spheroid surface.
            than 90% throughout the measurement period. These   Table 1 displays the fluorescence intensity of the obtained
            results demonstrated that the developed model could keep   images; both increased gradually from the control to the
            the cells alive without any special intervention.  aflatoxin B1 concentration of 5 μM. In comparison to the
                                                               control, wherein the average intensities of CD133 and
            3.2. Single tumor spheroids analysis based on the   ALDH1 were 11.6 and 14.5, respectively, the aflatoxin B1
            expression of cancer stem cell markers             concentration of 5 μM caused nearly three times increase
            Figure 2 shows the immunostaining results of HepG2   in the average intensities of CD133 and ALDH1 (35.4
            spheroids  exposed  to  four  different  aflatoxin  B1   and 43.7, respectively) (Figure 2e). The increment in
            concentrations, i.e., 0, 1, 2.5, and 5 μM, on the 7th day. The   fluorescence intensities of CD133 and ALDH1 markers
            blue, green, and red signals indicate cell nuclei, CD133,   revealed that the drug-resistant properties of single HepG2
            and ALDH1 markers, respectively. The positivity of both   tumor spheroids were enhanced as a result of aflatoxin B1
            CD133 and ALDH1 markers was partially shown in single   treatment.
            cells of single HepG2 spheroids (Figure 2). The extents to
            which they were expressed increased as the concentration   The number of single CSCs formed by exposure
            of treated aflatoxin B1 increased. CD133 is expressed on the   to aflatoxin B1 was determined at the single tumor


            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        365                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0985
   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378