Page 377 - IJB-9-6
P. 377

International Journal of Bioprinting                                  Aflatoxin B1-induced cancer stem cells




            the most significant in cancer pathogenesis . However, its   tendency proved  that single tumor  spheroid  imaging,
                                              [63]
            role as a CSC inducer has not been thoroughly investigated.   like the frequently used FACS analysis, could also be an
            Kawasaki  et al. isolated hepatoma K2 cells from rat   effective method for investigating the correlation between
            exposed to aflatoxin B1 . They found that 89% of cell   liver CSCs and the carcinogen aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, it
                               [64]
            population was occupied by CSCs, while stemness genes   should be noticed that single tumor spheroids for imaging
            such as sox2, nanog, and klf4 were remarkably expressed.   and FACS analysis were fabricated by 3D bioprinting. The
            In addition, by treating HepG2 cells with various aflatoxin   present study clearly demonstrated the possibility of drug-
            B1 concentrations and sorting out CSCs based on surface   resistant CSCs forming in a single liver tumor spheroid
            markers, Ju  et al. confirmed a similar result regarding   by exposure to aflatoxin B1 carcinogen. A single tumor
            the ability of aflatoxin B1 ability to induce CSCs .   spheroid can correspond to a human patient having liver
                                                        [18]
            Nonetheless, both aforementioned findings were observed   tumor based on the fact that the patient may be exposed to
            in 2D cell culture, which has been proven to have numerous   aflatoxin B1 through daily diet.
            limitations, making it clinically less significant. This study,
            which examines the phenomena in 3D tumor spheroid, may   5. Conclusion
            offer a novel and more remarkable insight into the actual
            effects of aflatoxin B1 on the formation of CSCs in a tumor.  In  the  present  study,  we  developed  a  3D  tumor  spheroid
                                                               model fabricated via 3D bioprinting to monitor the formation
               In this study, two methods were employed to determine   of liver CSCs induced by aflatoxin B1. CSCs were observed
            the presence of CSCs. Regarding single spheroid imaging,   using  single  tumor  spheroid  imaging  and  FACS  analysis.
            the analysis at the single-cell level indicated that the higher   After using both methods, a correlation between aflatoxin B1
            the aflatoxin B1 concentration for treatment, the lower the   dose and CSC level was observed: the higher the aflatoxin B1
            cell number in a spheroid. This could be attributed to the   concentration for treatment, the higher the number of CSCs
            dual influence exerted by aflatoxin B1. Specifically, aflatoxin   could be detected. The similarity between the detailed results
            B1 not only induces CSCs but also causes DNA damage. This   of two methods suggests the suitability of 3D bioprinting-
            phenomenon is more evident at higher concentrations .   based single tumor spheroid analysis for quantification of
                                                        [65]
            This could also explain the deviation between the results   drug-resistant single liver CSCs induced by aflatoxin B1.
            obtained from single spheroid imaging and FACS in the
            present study. In the results of single spheroid imaging   Acknowledgments
            and FACS, similarities could be observed in the control   We are grateful to the Research Institute of Pharmaceutical
            and low  dose-treated samples.  However,  the difference   Sciences at Seoul National University for providing
            in the number of CSCs acquired by FACS and imaging   experimental equipment and Brain Korea 21 Plus (BK21
            became more noticeable as the concentration of aflatoxin   Plus).
            B1 increased. Indeed, as the tumor spheroids had a smaller
            number of single cancer cells, the percentage of single CSCs   Funding
            obtained by the spheroid imaging showed higher values of
            19.2% and 29% at aflatoxin B1 concentrations of 2.5 and   This work was supported by a National Research Foundation
            5 μM, compared to 15% and 20.3%, respectively, acquired by   of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Ministry of Education,
            FACS analysis at identical aflatoxin B1 concentrations. This   Science and Technology (MEST) (No. 2018M3A7B4071235,
            is attributed to the growth of single tumor spheroids being   2023R1A2C3006991, and RS-2023-00218543).
            significantly inhibited by the DNA-damaging aflatoxin B1,
            and this phenomenon occurs more frequently at higher   Conflict of interest
            concentrations of aflatoxin B1. As a result, Table 2 shows   The authors declare no conflicts of interests.
            that there was smaller population of single cancer cells in
            single spheroids at higher concentrations of aflatoxin B1. In   Author contributions
            addition, owing to the growth-inhibiting effect of aflatoxin   Conceptualization: Joon Myong Song
            B1, more single cancer cells fixed in the hydrogel were   Formal analysis: Viet Phuong Cao, Sera Hong
            observed. They could not be distinguished and excluded   Investigation: Viet Phuong Cao
            through the FACS analysis, although they could contribute   Supervision: Joon Myong Song
            to the entire population, regardless of which markers   Writing – original draft: Viet Phuong Cao
            they expressed. However, it was obvious that the increase   Writing – review & editing: Viet Phuong Cao, Joon Myong
            in the number of drug-resistant CSCs as the aflatoxin B1   Song, Sera Hong
            concentration increased showed an identical tendency in
            both spheroid imaging and FACS analysis. This similar   All authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

            Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023)                        369                          https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0985
   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382