Page 379 - IJB-9-6

International Journal of Bioprinting Aflatoxin B1-induced cancer stem cells

27. Dzobo K, Dandara C, 2023, The extracellular matrix: 42. Samson AAS, Balwe SG, Hong S, et al., 2023, Verification
Its composition, function, remodeling, and role in of nanomaterial-induced size-dependent human ether-
tumorigenesis. Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 8(2): 146. à-go-go-related gene potassium channel blockage using
three-dimensional bioengineered functional cardiac tissue
28. Najafi M, Farhood B, Mortezaee K, 2019, Extracellular
matrix (ECM) stiffness and degradation as cancer drivers. constructs. Chem Mater, 35(2): 658–671.
J Cell Biochem, 120(3): 2782–2790. 43. Yu J, Lee S, Song J, et al., 2022, Perfusable micro-vascularized
3D tissue array for high-throughput vascular phenotypic
29. Ravi M, Paramesh V, Kaviya SR, et al., 2015, 3D cell culture
systems: Advantages and applications. J Cell Physiol 230(1): screening. Nano Converg, 9(1): 16.
16–26. 44. Dong Z, Gong J, Zhang H, et al., 2022, Preparation and
characterization of 3D printed porous 45S5 bioglass
30. Jensen C, Teng Y, 2020, Is it time to start transitioning from
2D to 3D cell culture? Front Mol Biosci, 7: 33. bioceramic for bone tissue engineering application. Int J
Bioprint, 8(4): 613.
31. Bokhari M, Carnachan RJ, Cameron NR, et al., 2007, Culture 45. Abdelrahim AA, Hong S, Song JM, 2022, Integrative in situ
of HepG2 liver cells on three dimensional polystyrene photodynamic therapy-induced cell death measurement
scaffolds enhances cell structure and function during of 3D-bioprinted MCF-7 tumor spheroids. Anal Chem, 94:
toxicological challenge. J Anatom, 211(4): 567–576.
13936–13943.
32. Rodriguez-Salvador M, Fox-Miranda I, Perez-Benitez BE, 46. Hong S, Song JM, 2021, A 3D cell printing-fabricated HepG2
et al., 2022, Research dynamics of tissue spheroids as building liver spheroid model for high-content in situ quantification
blocks: A scientometric analysis. Int J Bioprint, 8(3): 585.
of drug-induced liver toxicity. Biomater Sci, 9(17):
33. Kim JY, Rhim W-K, Cha S-G, et al., 2022, Bolstering the 5939–5950.
secretion and bioactivities of umbilical cord MSC-derived 47. Hong S, Song JM, 2022, 3D bioprinted drug-resistant breast
extracellular vesicles with 3D culture and priming in cancer spheroids for quantitative in situ evaluation of drug
chemically defined media. Nano Converg, 9(1): 57. resistance. Acta Biomater, 138: 228–239.
34. Schyschka L, Sánchez JJM, Wang Z, et al., 2013, Hepatic 3D 48. Hong S, Song JM, 2023, High-resolution in situ high-content
cultures but not 2D cultures preserve specific transporter imaging of 3D-bioprinted single breast cancer spheroids for
activity for acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch advanced quantification of benzo(a)pyrene carcinogen-
Toxicol, 87(8): 1581–1593. induced breast cancer stem cells. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces,
35. Huang YJ, Hsu SH, 2014, Acquisition of epithelial- 15(9): 11416–11430.
mesenchymal transition and cancer stem-like phenotypes 49. Shao L, Hou R, Zhu Y, et al., 2021, Pre-shear bioprinting of
within chitosan-hyaluronan membrane-derived 3D tumor highly oriented porous hydrogel microfibers to construct
spheroids. Biomaterials, 35(38): 10070–10079. anisotropic tissues. Biomater Sci, 9(20): 6763–6771.
36. Kawashima D, Yuki T, Li S, et al., 2022, Non-invasive imaging 50. Tetsuka H, Shin SR, 2020, Materials and technical
of ion concentration distribution around cell spheroids by innovations in 3D printing in biomedical applications.
electrical impedance tomographic sensor printed on circuit J Mater Chem B, 8(15): 2930–2950.
board under temporal compensation by ion transport
impedance model Biosens Bioelectron, 212: 114432. 51. Wang T-Y, Li X-F, Liu S-M, et al., 2022, Self-assembled
wide bandgap nanocoatings enabled outstanding dielectric
37. Langhans SA, 2018, Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture characteristics in the sandwich-like structure polymer
models in drug discovery and drug repositioning, Front composites. Nano Converg, 9(1): 55.
Pharmacol, 9: 6.
52. Clark DW, Palle KJA, 2016, Aldehyde dehydrogenases in
38. Ahmed A, Azam A, Wang Y, et al., 2021, Additively cancer stem cells: Potential as therapeutic targets. Ann
manufactured nano-mechanical energy harvesting systems: Transl Med, 4(24): 518.
Advancements, potential applications, challenges and future
perspectives. Nano Converg, 8(1): 37. 53. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al., 2021, Global Cancer
Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and
39. Ranjan P, Gaur S, Yadav H, et al., 2022, 2D materials: mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA:
Increscent quantum flatland with immense potential for Cancer J Clin, 71(3): 209–249.
applications. Nano Converg, 9(1): 26.
54. Miao Y, Yang T, Yang S, et al., 2022, Protein nanoparticles
40. Kim J, Lee J-K, Chae B, et al., 2022, Near-field infrared directed cancer imaging and therapy. Nano Converg, 9(1): 2.
nanoscopic study of EUV- and e-beam-exposed hydrogen
silsesquioxane photoresist. Nano Converg, 9(1): 53. 55. Zhou H-M, Zhang J-G, Zhang X, et al., 2021, Targeting cancer
stem cells for reversing therapy resistance: Mechanism,
41. Pérez B, Nykvist H, Brøgger AF, et al., 2019, Impact of signaling, and prospective agents. Signal Transduct Target
macronutrients printability and 3D-printer parameters on Ther, 6(1): 62.
3D-food printing: A review. Food Chem, 287: 249–257.

Volume 9 Issue 6 (2023) 371 https://doi.org/10.36922/ijb.0985