Page 132 - v11i4
P. 132

International Journal of Bioprinting                                3D bioprinting for translational toxicology




            19.  Homan KA, Kolesky DB, Skylar-Scott MA, et al. Bioprinting   31.  Franco NH. Animal experiments in biomedical research: a
               of 3D convoluted renal proximal tubules on perfusable   historical perspective. Animals (Basel). 2013;3(1):238-273.
               chips. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):34845.                   doi: 10.3390/ani3010238
               doi: 10.1038/srep34845                          32.  Erhirhie  EO, Ihekwereme CP, Ilodigwe EE. Advances  in
            20.  Kang D, Hong G, An S,  et al. Bioprinting of multiscaled   acute toxicity testing: Strengths, weaknesses and regulatory
               hepatic lobules within a highly vascularized construct.   acceptance. Interdiscip Toxicol. 2018;11(1):5-12.
               Small. 2020;16(13):e1905505.                       doi: 10.2478/intox-2018-0001
               doi: 10.1002/smll.201905505                     33.  Seidle T, Robinson S, Holmes T, et al. Cross-sector review
            21.  Choudhury D, Tun HW, Wang T, Naing MW. Organ-derived   of drivers and available 3Rs approaches for acute systemic
               decellularized extracellular matrix: a game changer for bioink   toxicity testing. Toxicol Sci. 2010;116(2):382-396.
               manufacturing? Trends Biotechnol. 2018;36(8):787-805.     doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq143
               doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.03.003              34.  Botham  PA. Acute systemic  toxicity–prospects  for  tiered
            22.  Kaden T, Graf K, Rennert K, Li R, Mosig AS, Raasch M.   testing strategies. Toxicol In Vitro. 2004;18(2):227-230.
               Evaluation of drug-induced liver toxicity of trovafloxacin      doi: 10.1016/S0887-2333(03)00143-7
               and levofloxacin in a human microphysiological liver model.   35.  Mukherjee P, Roy S, Ghosh D, Nandi SK. Role of animal
               Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):13338.                         models in biomedical research: a review.  Lab Anim Res.
               doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40004-z                    2022;38:18.
            23.  Michaleas  SN,  Laios  K,  Tsoucalas  G,  Androutsos  G.      doi: 10.1186/s42826-022-00128-1
               Theophrastus bombastus von hohenheim (paracelsus)   36.  Khabib MNH, Sivasanku Y, Lee HB, Kumar S, Kue CS.
               (1493-1541): the eminent physician and pioneer of   Alternative animal models in predictive toxicology.
               toxicology. Toxicol Rep. 2021;8:411-414.           Toxicology. 2022;465:153053.
               doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.02.012                  doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2021.153053
            24.  Herr HW. Percivall pott, the environment and cancer. BJU   37.  Harrison RG, Greenman MJ, Mall FP, Jackson CM.
               Int. 2011;108(4):479-481.                          Observations of the living developing nerve fiber. Anat Rec.
               doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10487.x              1907;1(5):116-128.
            25.  Bertomeu-Sánchez JR. Animal experiments, vital forces      doi: 10.1002/ar.1090010503
               and courtrooms: Mateu orfila, françois magendie and the   38.  Jones HW. Record of the first physician to see henrietta lacks
               study of poisons in nineteenth-century france.  Ann Sci.   at the johns hopkins hospital: history of the beginning of the
               2012;69(1):1-26.                                   HeLa cell line. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;176(6):s227-s228.
               doi: 10.1080/00033790.2011.637471                  doi: 10.1016/S0002-9378(97)70379-X
            26.  Michaleas SN, Veskoukis AS, Samonis G, Pantos C,   39.  Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, et al. Embryonic
               Androutsos G, Karamanou M. Mathieu joseph bonaventure   stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.  Science.
               orfila (1787-1853): the founder of modern toxicology.   1998;282(5391):1145-1147.
               Maedica (Bucur). 2022;17(2):532-537.               doi: 10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
               doi: 10.26574/maedica.2022.17.2.532
                                                               40.  Martin G. Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from
            27.  Ayala RA. Welcome to the new age. Claude bernard’s   early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned
               “introduction to the study of experimental medicine” and   by teratocarcinoma stem cells.  PNAS. 1981;78(12):
               the shift of medical thought towards science: 150 years later.   7634-7638.
               Arch Med Res. 2017;48(4):393-396.                  doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.12.7634
               doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2017.08.006
                                                               41.  Ames BN, Lee FD, Durston WE. An improved bacterial test
            28.  An H, Sg G. Historical milestones and discoveries that   system for the detection and classification of mutagens and
               shaped the toxicology sciences. EXS. 2009;99:1-35.  carcinogens. PNAS. 1973;70(3):782-786.
               doi: 10.1007/978-3-7643-8336-7_1                   doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.3.782
            29.  DePass LR. Alternative approaches in median lethality (LD₅₀)   42.  Zeiger E. The test that changed the world: The ames test and
               and acute toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett. 1989;49(2-3):159-170.  the regulation of chemicals. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ
               doi: 10.1016/0378-4274(89)90030-1                  Mutagene. 2019;841:43-48.
                                                                  doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2019.05.007
            30.  Pillai S, Kobayashi K, Michael M, Mathai T, Sivakumar B,
               Sadasivan P. John william trevan’s concept of median lethal   43.  Volpe  DA.  Drug-permeability  and  transporter  assays
               dose (LD50/LC50) – more misused than used.  J Pre Clin   in caco-2 and mdck cell lines.  Future Med  Chem.
               Clin Res. 2021;15(3):137-141.                      2011;3(16):2063-2077.
               doi: 10.26444/jpccr/139588                         doi: 10.4155/fmc.11.149


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       124                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025210209
   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137