Page 256 - v11i4
P. 256

International Journal of Bioprinting                         Deep learning-based 3D digital model of fetal heart




















































            Figure 2. Examples of the segmentation results by threshold and FRT from different views (FCV, OTV, and TVV): (A) original images; (B) threshold
            segmentation results, and (C) FRT segmentation result. Abbreviations: FCV: Four-chamber view; FRT: Fetal heart reconstruction technique; OTV:
            Outflow tract view; TVV: Three-vessel view.



            slightly decreased, validating our hypothesis to an extent.   digital model was affected by the segmentation performance
            Although deep learning has achieved remarkable progress   across all layers within the US volume data, making the
            over the past decade, the robustness and interpretability   variability of segmentation performance crucial for 3D
            of automated medical image segmentation have not been   model reconstruction. A box plot was plotted, and the
            sufficiently addressed. To overcome the limitation, FRT   standard deviations (STDs) were calculated to investigate
            used interactive image segmentation through manual   the  variability  of segmentation  results  using  different
            correction by expert sonographers. As displayed in    methods on the validation set (Figure 4). Compared with
            Table 2, the IOU and DSC of FRT from different views   other methods, the variance IOU/DSC of OTV (FRT-
            had advantages over that of U-Net, which is an automated   Default: median: 0.692/0.818, STD: 0.055/0.038; FRT-IA:
            method designed for fast and precise segmentation of   median: 0.693/0.819, STD: 0.069/0.051) and TVV (FRT-
            biomedical images. These findings demonstrated that FRT   Default: median: 0.609/0.757, STD: 0.096/0.087; FRT-
            had greater segmentation performance compared to U-Net.  IA: median: 0.613/0.760, STD: 0.101/0.091) segmented
                                                               by FRT were smaller. However, on FCV, junior doctors
            3.3. Comparison with variation                     achieved better performance than that of FRT (median:
            Reconstruction of the 3D digital model relies on the   0.8104/0.8953, STD: 0.040/0.025). In addition, compared
            segmentation results of each layer. The reliability of the 3D   to FRT and junior doctors, U-Net demonstrated no


            Volume 11 Issue 4 (2025)                       248                            doi: 10.36922/IJB025200192
   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261